On 12/03/14 10:16, jay binks wrote:
In my test case I was doing an INSERT query...
yet db_cassandra would complain there was no result... ( both the log
message and return code )
In understand that and you are right here -- even select
can have no
result (but maybe is setting some other fields there). What I want to
clarify is that in case of a query error (e.g., wrong statement or
something happened with the connection), is it detected? Not to behave
like it was all ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
This is the reason I provided the patch.
after a little more testing I have found that I get this log message :
0(23827) ERROR: <core> [db_res.c:130]: db_free_result(): invalid parameter
So far in my testing everything has performed flawlessly, just with a
few less log lines :)
in essence this patch simply makes db_cassandra act the same when
there is no result set as it does when there are now rows.
( previously it would act like no result set was a big deal )
Jay
On 12 March 2014 18:49, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
What would be the situation when the query is like SELECT but
there is no result. Is the behaviour as expected with the new patch?
Anyone here using cassandra having comments? From my point of view
is no problem to push the patch, but I am not using cassandra, so
cannot do a proper review.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/14 08:53, jay binks wrote:
If doing a query that returns no results (
Insert etc )
db_cassa_raw_query would cause these ERRORS to be logged
0(22283) ERROR: db_cassandra [dbcassa_base.cpp:739]:
db_cassa_raw_query(): The resultype rows was not set, no point
trying to parse result.
0(22283) ERROR: avpops [avpops_db.c:333]: db_query_avp(): cannot
do the query
db_cassa_raw_query would also return -1 as a failure code which
caused avpops_db to log the query failure.
my patch changes the db_cassa_raw_query log message to debug
level, and returns success from the function.
I had a quick look to see if there was an elegant way to
determine if we should expect results, so we can vary the
response code based on query type, but I was unable to find
anything other than doing string comparisons on the query, so I
opted to not bother with this as it would be erroneous.
Please find attached patch.
--
Sincerely
Jay
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Sincerely
Jay
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 2-4, 2014, Berlin, Germany
http://www.kamailioworld.com