Hey Daniel,
The problem in the case I have noticed is that some UEs are taking the contact from the 200OK and all subsequent requests from the UEs have the alias in (when leaving UE). This causes problems in the routing as a result of the same alias being added multiple times.....
If you are happy with the general concept I'd like to add this patch but with addition of:
1. configurable parameter to enable (disabled by default)
2. make the check more intelligent to check you are not adding *exactly* the same alias again.... (which would be pointless)
?
Cheers
Jason
On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 12:34:30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
there are two functions, add_contact_alias() and
set_contact_alias(), fist added by Juha and the second by me.
Is that really needed, because if couple of sip nodes add that
parameter, then expect that each node will handle it.
A --- P1 --- P2 --- P3 --- B
If P1 is adding by P2 is processing as well, then it will mess up
routing. I think by the order they are added, they are going to be
processed ok even many nodes are adding it.
If there is no safe around detecting if alias was added locally in
handle_ruri_alias(), then this patch behaviour should be made
configurable if still wanted.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev