Thanks, should I backport it too?<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;<br>
notifications@github.com&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; It&#39;s a bit foggy the purpose right now, or better said the duration when<br>
&gt; that flag is needed. I didn&#39;t have the time to dig into it too much and<br>
&gt; don&#39;t remember the full purpose for it right now. I expected to be related<br>
&gt; to the fact of choosing the final response while a suspended branch is<br>
&gt; still processed.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; But I think your patch is better in this regard, because it preserves the<br>
&gt; old behaviour (which didn&#39;t have a complaint on this flag) longer, until a<br>
&gt; new suspend is done. So can be merged as it is.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; —<br>
&gt; You are receiving this because you authored the thread.<br>
&gt; Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<br>
&gt; &lt;https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276086137&gt;,<br>
&gt; or mute the thread<br>
&gt; &lt;https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADip44rHstoc23NanawiPEhAdBUkWDJwks5rXfx4gaJpZM4LwvBV&gt;<br>
&gt; .<br>
&gt;<br>


<p style="font-size:small;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none;color:#666;">&mdash;<br />You are receiving this because you commented.<br />Reply to this email directly, <a href="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276087863">view it on GitHub</a>, or <a href="https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZUrHpIabiLV3p3emS6Wy2-blDXh_ks5rXf3kgaJpZM4LwvBV">mute the thread</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AF36ZbVCU17g6G39ZZyyeDjqJmOYcEXBks5rXf3kgaJpZM4LwvBV.gif" width="1" /></p>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage">
<div itemprop="action" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction">
  <link itemprop="url" href="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276087863"></link>
  <meta itemprop="name" content="View Pull Request"></meta>
</div>
<meta itemprop="description" content="View this Pull Request on GitHub"></meta>
</div>

<script type="application/json" data-scope="inboxmarkup">{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/kamailio/kamailio","title":"kamailio/kamailio","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@grumvalski in #955: Thanks, should I backport it too?\n\nOn Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla \u003c\nnotifications@github.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e It's a bit foggy the purpose right now, or better said the duration when\n\u003e that flag is needed. I didn't have the time to dig into it too much and\n\u003e don't remember the full purpose for it right now. I expected to be related\n\u003e to the fact of choosing the final response while a suspended branch is\n\u003e still processed.\n\u003e\n\u003e But I think your patch is better in this regard, because it preserves the\n\u003e old behaviour (which didn't have a complaint on this flag) longer, until a\n\u003e new suspend is done. So can be merged as it is.\n\u003e\n\u003e —\n\u003e You are receiving this because you authored the thread.\n\u003e Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276086137\u003e,\n\u003e or mute the thread\n\u003e \u003chttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADip44rHstoc23NanawiPEhAdBUkWDJwks5rXfx4gaJpZM4LwvBV\u003e\n\u003e .\n\u003e\n"}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276087863"}}}</script>