Hi
The attached patch fixes our problem.
As you suggested delete_shtable takes a subs_t pointer as an argument and compares the dialog's full tag set before deleting.
If everyone is OK with this patch, on Monday I will look at a patch for the RLS module - it looks a little bit tricky as I think RLS exports the pres_delete_shtable through its own API as rls_delete_shtable, though I'm not 100% sure on this.
Regards Richard.
On 23 January 2014 17:24, Andrew Mortensen admorten@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Jason Penton jason.penton@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Shot for the prompt response. I am happy to make these changes if we all
agree... I was concerned like you of the impact on the consumers, but as you say just RLS.
Can I go ahead?
You have my support. Post the patch here for review.
andrew
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Mortensen <
admorten@isc.upenn.edu> wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Jason Penton jason.penton@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey all,
I was taking a look at the presence module API code, specfically the
API code for the hash table. I see that when we delete a subscription according to hash.c:
[snip] Why are we only searching on to-tag? What if there is a collision on
the hash AND the to-tag is the same for 2+ different subscriptions. This is even more likely of happening considering that the hash calculation is based only on the callid and to-tag...
At least nominally the tag should be globally unique, per RFC3261:
19.3 ... When a tag is generated by a UA for insertion into a request or response, it MUST be globally unique and cryptographically random with at least 32 bits of randomness.
But I agree that poorly behaved UAs could cause problems here. (We
actually ran into duplicate to-tags recently with vendor handsets booted simultaneously.)
It looks to me like we should be calling search_shtable, which compares
the dialog's full tag set. The problem is that unlike other similar calls, delete_shtable doesn't take a subs_t pointer as an argument, so the only point of reference is the to-tag. Fortunately it looks like there's only one place delete_shtable's called in the presence module, so it shouldn't be much work to start using search_shtable to find the subscription to delete.
To complicate things further, though, delete_shtable is exported as part
of the presence API, so we'd need to update all API consumers as well. That doesn't seem unreasonable, as a quick git grep indicates the only current user of the presence API is the rls module.
andrew _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer