Hello,
probably was me with the safety check to avoid dns srv for ws -- it was done before checking if it is an IP address.
Can you try now the latest master branch?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/2/13 2:07 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
I've repeated the test with DEBUG level logging. The logs seem to indicate that whatever this problem is, it happens when trying to relay (using t_relay()) when outbound is in use. Here are the detailed logs:
16(1547) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:86]: is_preloaded(): is_preloaded: Yes16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 27==11 && [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net] == [10.112.7.76]16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 5060) matches port 508016(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 27==11 && [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net] == [10.112.7.76]16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 80 (advertise 80) matches port 508016(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 27==11 && [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net] == [10.112.7.76]16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 5060) matches port 508016(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 27==11 && [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net] == [10.112.7.76]16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5080 (advertise 5080) matches port 508016(1547) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:603]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking advertise if host==us: 27==27 && [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net] == [edge01-int.crocodilertc.net]16(1547) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:785]: after_loose(): Topmost route URI: 'sip:RaOAmYgp669h0QYKcAdMAbtamABmhaE=@edge01-int.crocodilertc.net:5080;transport=tcp;lr;ob' is me16(1547) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:525]: process_outbound(): "incoming" request found. Using flow-token forrouting16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header16(1547) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:181]: find_next_route(): No next Route HF found16(1547) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:809]: after_loose(): No next URI found16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1372]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil)16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=4829, isACK=016(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:374]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7fe2a1af2080, callback type 1, id 0 entered16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 86424f366665cacef83c4e082d9c716716(1547) ERROR: <core> [resolve.c:1700]: sip_hostport2su(): ERROR: sip_hostport2su: could not resolve hostname: "90.152.0.102"16(1547) ERROR: tm [ut.h:337]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "90.152.0.102"16(1547) ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1772]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:357]: t_relay_to(): ERROR:tm:t_relay_to: t_forward_nonack returned error16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:374]: t_relay_to(): -478 error reply generation delayed16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1071]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=1 global id=1 T start=0x7fe2a1af208016(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1143]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found!16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(10.185.34.56, registrar-int.crocodilertc.net, 0)16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called16(1547) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1667]: cleanup_uac_timers(): DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2320]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (1547 (16)), reusing fd16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2556]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending...16(1547) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2590]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7fe2a19f1d70 n=651 fd=816(1547) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2591]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf=SIP/2.0 430 Flow Failed^M
Does anyone know of any recent TM or resolver changes that would affect this?
Regards,
Peter
On 2 October 2013 11:49, Peter Dunkley <peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.net> wrote:
Hello,
I am getting the following errors with the latest code:
Oct 2 10:48:00 edge00 kamailio-edge[8847]: ERROR: <core> [resolve.c:1700]: sip_hostport2su(): ERROR: sip_hostport2su: could not resolve hostname: "90.152.0.102"Oct 2 10:48:00 edge00 kamailio-edge[8847]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:337]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "90.152.0.102"Oct 2 10:48:00 edge00 kamailio-edge[8847]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1772]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
Regards,
Peter--
Peter DunkleyTechnical DirectorCrocodile RCS Ltd
--
Peter DunkleyTechnical DirectorCrocodile RCS Ltd
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013 - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev