18 Dec
2014
18 Dec
'14
7:37 p.m.
On 18 Dec 2014, at 17:50, Victor Seva <notifications(a)github.com> wrote:
Well, if you need dynamic match, and We need it, I see
no other clean solution.
Now you can already use an avp inside the match like '^(00|+)?$avp(s:match)$' but
If you have more than one value to check... you have to do a bucle to acomplish that.
I see that the functionality is cool, but wonder if we should make it easier to
dynamically manipulate dialplans instead.
On that topic - why avp stacks, why not hash tables?
/O