Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Thanks for the PR. The patch uses standard malloc, which is not the right choice in the tm module.
So I understand the problem is that the header is stored inside the transaction as "Call-ID", but the provider sends back it as "CALL-ID"? What about just using then strncasecmp (similar as for the CSEQ) for the Call-Id field? Are you able to test a patch?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.