24 Aug
2009
24 Aug
'09
4:05 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
:-) -- ahh, yes, imo, srctl sort of exists already,
but is called
kamctl.
are you saying that one can control s modules with kamctl? i know that
one can control both s and k modules with serctl (except for async
t_uac_dlg).
-- juha