Hello,
being discussed at events offline or during irc meetings couple of times, I want to open the discussion about updating the default configuration file to use rtpengine. So far I let rtpproxy because was packaged in many Linux distros, however, given the benefits of rtpengine in terms of performance as well as webrtc support, doubled by the fact that nowadays in the community it seems to be the primary choice of rtp relay, we should decide what to do. I see two options:
1) add a define to allow selection between rtpproxy and rtpengine
2) replace rtpproxy completely with rtpengine
I would prefer 2) for simplicity of the configuration file, but the main question for the users community is how easy they find the deploying of rtpengine. Using Debian/Ubuntu should be trivial, there are packages for it, but I do not know about CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE or other Linux/BSD OSes people here are using it.
Reply to sr-users if you have an opinion on this matter (I cc-ed sr-dev mainly to make aware the devs, but it is a matter of using kamailio). Of course, other suggestions are welcome as well.
Cheers, Daniel
Hello Daniel,
I use rtpengine on Centos 7. It's possible to create an DKMS package (automatic rebuild for new Kernel version).
Kind regards Karsten
Am Di., 15. Jan. 2019, 10:00 hat Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com geschrieben:
Hello,
being discussed at events offline or during irc meetings couple of times, I want to open the discussion about updating the default configuration file to use rtpengine. So far I let rtpproxy because was packaged in many Linux distros, however, given the benefits of rtpengine in terms of performance as well as webrtc support, doubled by the fact that nowadays in the community it seems to be the primary choice of rtp relay, we should decide what to do. I see two options:
add a define to allow selection between rtpproxy and rtpengine
replace rtpproxy completely with rtpengine
I would prefer 2) for simplicity of the configuration file, but the main question for the users community is how easy they find the deploying of rtpengine. Using Debian/Ubuntu should be trivial, there are packages for it, but I do not know about CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE or other Linux/BSD OSes people here are using it.
Reply to sr-users if you have an opinion on this matter (I cc-ed sr-dev mainly to make aware the devs, but it is a matter of using kamailio). Of course, other suggestions are welcome as well.
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Karsten, if you use repo for rtpengine, please share the link.
ср, 16 янв. 2019 г. в 19:16, Karsten Horsmann khorsmann@gmail.com:
Hello Daniel,
I use rtpengine on Centos 7. It's possible to create an DKMS package (automatic rebuild for new Kernel version).
Kind regards Karsten
Am Di., 15. Jan. 2019, 10:00 hat Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda@gmail.com> geschrieben:
Hello,
being discussed at events offline or during irc meetings couple of times, I want to open the discussion about updating the default configuration file to use rtpengine. So far I let rtpproxy because was packaged in many Linux distros, however, given the benefits of rtpengine in terms of performance as well as webrtc support, doubled by the fact that nowadays in the community it seems to be the primary choice of rtp relay, we should decide what to do. I see two options:
add a define to allow selection between rtpproxy and rtpengine
replace rtpproxy completely with rtpengine
I would prefer 2) for simplicity of the configuration file, but the main question for the users community is how easy they find the deploying of rtpengine. Using Debian/Ubuntu should be trivial, there are packages for it, but I do not know about CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE or other Linux/BSD OSes people here are using it.
Reply to sr-users if you have an opinion on this matter (I cc-ed sr-dev mainly to make aware the devs, but it is a matter of using kamailio). Of course, other suggestions are welcome as well.
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Denys Pozniak -
Karsten Horsmann