4 Oct
2019
4 Oct
'19
4:46 p.m.
### Description
Setting string values via `cfg_rpc` leaves old strings in SHM.
#### Reproduction
<!--
If the issue can be reproduced, describe how it can be done.
-->
Set some string value to e.g. `tm.ac_extra_hdrs`:
```shell
x=10
while [ $x -gt 0 ] ; do
sudo kamctl rpc cfg.sets tm ac_extra_hdrs das$x >/dev/null
sleep 0.001
x=$((x - 1))
done
```
#### Debugging Data
After running above snippet four times:
```
sudo kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core mem_dump_shm 1
grep "^Oct 4 15:11:4.* qm_status:.*alloc'd" /var/log/syslog | cut -d: -f6-
| sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep core/cfg/cfg
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_shmize(217)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(322)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(334)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(346)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(353)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(360)
2 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c: cfg_register_ctx(47)
3 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_clone_global(625)
39 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c: cfg_set_now(559)
40 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_child_cb_new(828)
42 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_clone_str(130)
sudo kamcmd mod.stats core shm|grep \\bcfg_
cfg_clone_global(625): 1392
cfg_set_now(559): 624
cfg_clone_str(130): 384
cfg_shmize(217): 696
cfg_register_ctx(47): 64
cfg_child_cb_new(828): 2560
```
memory values from cfg_clone_str addresses:
```
grep -B1 'Oct 4 15:11:4.*cfg_clone_str' /var/log/syslog|sed
'/address=/!d' | cut -d: -f6-
55. N address=0x7f1310eab7f8 frag=0x7f1310eab7c0 size=40 used=1
56. N address=0x7f1310eab888 frag=0x7f1310eab850 size=24 used=1
62. N address=0x7f1310ec7b10 frag=0x7f1310ec7ad8 size=8 used=1
65. N address=0x7f1310ec7ca0 frag=0x7f1310ec7c68 size=8 used=1
68. N address=0x7f1310ec7e30 frag=0x7f1310ec7df8 size=8 used=1
69. N address=0x7f1310ec7ea0 frag=0x7f1310ec7e68 size=8 used=1
72. N address=0x7f1310ec8030 frag=0x7f1310ec7ff8 size=8 used=1
75. N address=0x7f1310ec81c0 frag=0x7f1310ec8188 size=8 used=1
78. N address=0x7f1310ec8350 frag=0x7f1310ec8318 size=8 used=1
81. N address=0x7f1310ec84e0 frag=0x7f1310ec84a8 size=8 used=1
84. N address=0x7f1310ec8670 frag=0x7f1310ec8638 size=8 used=1
87. N address=0x7f1310ec8800 frag=0x7f1310ec87c8 size=8 used=1
90. N address=0x7f1310ec8990 frag=0x7f1310ec8958 size=8 used=1
93. N address=0x7f1310ec8b20 frag=0x7f1310ec8ae8 size=8 used=1
96. N address=0x7f1310ec8cb0 frag=0x7f1310ec8c78 size=8 used=1
99. N address=0x7f1310ec8e40 frag=0x7f1310ec8e08 size=8 used=1
103. N address=0x7f1310ec92f0 frag=0x7f1310ec92b8 size=8 used=1
106. N address=0x7f1310ec9480 frag=0x7f1310ec9448 size=8 used=1
109. N address=0x7f1310ec9610 frag=0x7f1310ec95d8 size=8 used=1
112. N address=0x7f1310ec97a0 frag=0x7f1310ec9768 size=8 used=1
115. N address=0x7f1310ec9930 frag=0x7f1310ec98f8 size=8 used=1
118. N address=0x7f1310ec9ac0 frag=0x7f1310ec9a88 size=8 used=1
121. N address=0x7f1310ec9c50 frag=0x7f1310ec9c18 size=8 used=1
124. N address=0x7f1310ec9de0 frag=0x7f1310ec9da8 size=8 used=1
127. N address=0x7f1310ec9f70 frag=0x7f1310ec9f38 size=8 used=1
131. N address=0x7f1310eca420 frag=0x7f1310eca3e8 size=8 used=1
134. N address=0x7f1310eca5b0 frag=0x7f1310eca578 size=8 used=1
137. N address=0x7f1310eca740 frag=0x7f1310eca708 size=8 used=1
140. N address=0x7f1310eca8d0 frag=0x7f1310eca898 size=8 used=1
144. N address=0x7f1310ecad80 frag=0x7f1310ecad48 size=8 used=1
147. N address=0x7f1310ecaf10 frag=0x7f1310ecaed8 size=8 used=1
150. N address=0x7f1310ecb0a0 frag=0x7f1310ecb068 size=8 used=1
153. N address=0x7f1310ecb230 frag=0x7f1310ecb1f8 size=8 used=1
156. N address=0x7f1310ecb3c0 frag=0x7f1310ecb388 size=8 used=1
159. N address=0x7f1310ecb550 frag=0x7f1310ecb518 size=8 used=1
162. N address=0x7f1310ecb6e0 frag=0x7f1310ecb6a8 size=8 used=1
165. N address=0x7f1310ecb870 frag=0x7f1310ecb838 size=8 used=1
168. N address=0x7f1310ecba00 frag=0x7f1310ecb9c8 size=8 used=1
172. N address=0x7f1310ecbeb0 frag=0x7f1310ecbe78 size=8 used=1
175. N address=0x7f1310ecc040 frag=0x7f1310ecc008 size=8 used=1
178. N address=0x7f1310ecc1d0 frag=0x7f1310ecc198 size=8 used=1
181. N address=0x7f1310ecc360 frag=0x7f1310ecc328 size=8 used=1
0x7f1310eab7f8: "trying -- your call is important to us"
0x7f1310eab888: "Server Internal Error"
0x7f1310ec7b10: "das10"
0x7f1310ec7ca0: "das9"
0x7f1310ec7e30: "das10"
0x7f1310ec7ea0: "das10"
0x7f1310ec8030: "das9"
0x7f1310ec81c0: "das9"
0x7f1310ec8350: "das8"
0x7f1310ec84e0: "das7"
0x7f1310ec8670: "das6"
0x7f1310ec8800: "das5"
0x7f1310ec8990: "das4"
0x7f1310ec8b20: "das3"
0x7f1310ec8cb0: "das2"
0x7f1310ec8e40: "das1"
0x7f1310ec92f0: "das10"
0x7f1310ec9480: "das9"
0x7f1310ec9610: "das8"
0x7f1310ec97a0: "das7"
0x7f1310ec9930: "das6"
0x7f1310ec9ac0: "das5"
0x7f1310ec9c50: "das4"
0x7f1310ec9de0: "das3"
0x7f1310ec9f70: "das2"
0x7f1310eca420: "das1"
0x7f1310eca5b0: "das8"
0x7f1310eca740: "das7"
0x7f1310eca8d0: "das6"
0x7f1310ecad80: "das5"
0x7f1310ecaf10: "das4"
0x7f1310ecb0a0: "das3"
0x7f1310ecb230: "das2"
0x7f1310ecb3c0: "das1"
0x7f1310ecb550: "das8"
0x7f1310ecb6e0: "das7"
0x7f1310ecb870: "das6"
0x7f1310ecba00: "das5"
0x7f1310ecbeb0: "das4"
0x7f1310ecc040: "das3"
0x7f1310ecc1d0: "das2"
0x7f1310ecc360: "das1"
```
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
/usr/sbin/kamailio -v
version: kamailio 5.2.4 (x86_64/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE,
USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC,
DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER,
USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled with gcc 6.3.0
```
* **Operating System**:
```
Debian 9.11
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094
7 Oct
7 Oct
7:45 p.m.
I looked today into it as well. I could reproduce it with current git master.
```
root@proxy-1:/usr/local/src/kamailio-devel# grep "^Oct 7 18:38.*
qm_status:.*alloc'd" /var/log/syslog | cut -d: -f6- | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
grep core/cfg/cfg
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_shmize(217)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(324)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(336)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(348)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(355)
1 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: sr_cfg_init(362)
2 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c: cfg_register_ctx(47)
2 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_clone_global(627)
80 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c: cfg_set_now(559)
81 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_child_cb_new(830)
84 alloc'd from core: core/cfg/cfg_struct.c: cfg_clone_str(130)
root@proxy-1:/usr/local/src/kamailio-devel# kamcmd core.version
kamailio 5.4.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 7cd263-dirty
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-539102437
9 Oct
9 Oct
12:54 p.m.
I haven't really went that deep in the related code, but there are reference counters
behind those values, so they might be released when all processes get to use the new
value, which can be later in time (or never, depending on the type of sip traffic).
Overall, I am not sure if the framework was designed to deal with very often changes,
could be more for adjusting some global/custom/module parameters from time to time to
avoid restarting kamailio.
With the first example in this report, changing very often the ac_extra_hdrs for tm is not
likely, imo.
If you need to use in config a string variable that has to be changed very often via rpc,
use better $shv(x) or $sht(t=>x) .
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-539929291
3:03 p.m.
I tested it with another cfg variable not related to any module (like we have pstn.gw_ip
in default cfg). The test system did not have any traffic, so i would assume that the
variable would be commited really fast. But I will have another look to it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-539970553
4:13 p.m.
That could actually be part of this case -- the values are cloned by each process to avoid
sync'ing with mutexes at runtime. Each process gets the new value when it executes
cfg_update(), which is typically done when a process has something new to do (e.g.,
process a new sip message). In your test case, as the old value is still referenced by
other processes, might not be destroyed.
This part of code is inherited from SER project, I am not very familiar with, that's
why I am saying it might be designed for a different purpose than is expected here (i.e.,
not for use with very often changes of values). My comments here are based on a brief look
at the code.
And, as I said, for needs related to values that need to be changed very often via rpc,
better use shared variable or shared hash table variables.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-539994980
4:18 p.m.
Yes, changing a cfg value e.g. every minute with this framework makes no sense. But good
comment about the update mechanism, I will play with it e.g. by sending some SIP messages.
I also looked into the code - but I am also not deeply familiar with the code, only looked
to it as well.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-539996662
6:07 p.m.
Daniel is right, the memory should be eventually freed when ALL the child processes update
their local configuration, i.e. do at least one iteration of their loop and call
cfg_update(). Each child process updates its local cfg pointer to the global one and
travels through the pending callback list. Every item of this list can have a set of
memory address to free. The last child that processes the change frees the memory.
Check cfg_update_local with the loop:
while (cfg_child_cb != last_cb) {...}
cfg_child_cb_free_item() frees the "replaced" strings.
The restriction is that none of the processes should be idle for a very long time. They
should at least update the local config from time to time. This may not be always the
case.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-540044623
6:23 p.m.
Thanks for the additional insight! So did I understood you correctly:
If I use Kamailio in a configuration with several children listening on different network
interfaces - if there is at least one child that does not handle traffic the
"replaced" strings are not freed?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-540051283
15 Oct
15 Oct
1:29 p.m.
Yes, this happens. The function updating the config block and replacing some strings of
that with newly allocated values cannot free the old ones because it does not know if a
child might still use the old values. We have to wait for all the children to release the
values.
One approach could be to wake up the children from time to time with a signal, even if
there is no traffic.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-542147380
31 Oct
31 Oct
7:07 p.m.
Thank you for the feedback. Ok, this would be a bit more complex change. I will need to
get some time to look into it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-548449192
8 Nov
8 Nov
11:21 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] core/cfg refactoring to free quicker the old values from inactive processes (#2094)
This issue is stale because it has been open 6 weeks with no activity. Remove stale label
or comment or this will be closed in 2 weeks.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-1801299993
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094/1801299993(a)github.com>
21 Nov
21 Nov
10:27 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] core/cfg refactoring to free quicker the old values from inactive processes (#2094)
We will investigate how complex it is to change/fix.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-1820370960
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094/1820370960(a)github.com>
3 Jan
3 Jan
5:39 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] core/cfg refactoring to free quicker the old values from inactive processes (#2094)
This issue is stale because it has been open 6 weeks with no activity. Remove stale label
or comment or this will be closed in 2 weeks.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#issuecomment-1874782751
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094/1874782751(a)github.com>
17 Jan
17 Jan
5:42 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] core/cfg refactoring to free quicker the old values from inactive processes (#2094)
Closed #2094 as not planned.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2094#event-11505805846
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issue/2094/issue_event/11505805846(a)github.com>
309
days inactive
1875
days old
13 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Bastian Triller -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
-
github-actions[bot]
-
Henning Westerholt
-
mtirpak