1 Oct
2009
1 Oct
'09
11:05 a.m.
regards
klaus
PS: I know I could fix it myself, but I used git some time ago and
already forgot the commands and workflow - so maybe another one can do
it quite faster :-)
1 Oct
1 Oct
12:22 p.m.
On Oct 01, 2009 at 10:05, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
It looks like we have 3 modules that depend on libpcre3: regex(k),
dialplan and lcr.
Shouldn't we package them separately, instead of adding a
dependency on pcre3 for the basic install?
E.g.: create 3 separate packages ser-regex-module ser-dialplan-module
ser-lcr-module.
Andrei
12:28 p.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
On Oct 01, 2009 at 10:05, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
It looks like we have 3 modules that depend on libpcre3: regex(k),
dialplan and lcr.
Shouldn't we package them separately, instead of adding a
dependency on pcre3 for the basic install?
E.g.: create 3 separate packages ser-regex-module ser-dialplan-module
ser-lcr-module.
Actually I don't care installing pcre3 even if I do not need these
modules, as hard disks are big enough in standard servers ...
1:22 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
<andrei(a)iptel.org> wrote:
On Oct 01, 2009 at 10:05, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
It looks like we have 3 modules that depend on libpcre3: regex(k),
dialplan and lcr.
Shouldn't we package them separately, instead of adding a
dependency on pcre3 for the basic install?
E.g.: create 3 separate packages ser-regex-module ser-dialplan-module
ser-lcr-module.
If we do it, we would end up having too many packages. I think there
is no reason to create new packages for modules that just depend on a
simple library.
Jan.
5531
days inactive
5531
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion