23 Jun
2009
23 Jun
'09
11:07 a.m.
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can
volunteer on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing
docu from the NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers
(Andrei? Jan?) should verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
klaus
23 Jun
23 Jun
11:18 a.m.
Klaus,
On 23-06 10:07, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can
volunteer on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing
docu from the NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers
(Andrei? Jan?) should verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
I'd be happy to read it, just let us know when there is something to read.
Jan.
1:34 p.m.
Hi Klaus,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Klaus
Darilion<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can volunteer
on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing docu from the
NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers (Andrei? Jan?) should
verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
Since SCTP was something not present in Kamailio, I could personally
contribute with that.
Cheers,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
3:13 p.m.
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
Hi Klaus,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Klaus
Darilion<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Actually it is present, but I think nobody used/tested it :-)
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can volunteer
on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing docu from the
NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers (Andrei? Jan?) should
verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
Since SCTP was something not present in Kamailio, I could personally
contribute with that.
3:18 p.m.
2009/6/23 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
Oh, sorry-- I meant it was not present in Kamailio Core CookBook for
version 1.5.x
Thanks,
--
Victor Pascual Ávila
Hi Klaus,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Klaus
Darilion<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Actually it is present, but I think nobody used/tested it :-)
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can
volunteer
on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing docu from
the
NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers (Andrei? Jan?)
should
verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
Since SCTP was something not present in Kamailio, I could personally
contribute with that.
4:23 p.m.
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
2009/6/23 Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
Ok. Yes please - all the *sctp* parameters are yours and waiting to be
filled up :-)
thanks
klaus
Victor Pascual Ávila schrieb:
Oh, sorry-- I meant it was not present in Kamailio Core CookBook for
version 1.5.x Hi Klaus,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Klaus
Darilion<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Actually it is present, but I think nobody used/tested it
:-) Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can
volunteer
on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing docu from
the
NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers (Andrei? Jan?)
should
verify if the doc is correct?
So if someone volunteers on reading the docs I would supply them.
Since SCTP was
something not present in Kamailio, I could personally
contribute with that. 
4:04 p.m.
2009/6/23 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>at>:
I really think that the SCTP implementation in SER is much better than
in Kamailio ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Since SCTP was
something not present in Kamailio, I could personally
contribute with that.
Actually it is present, but I think nobody used/tested it :-) 
24 Jun
24 Jun
7:08 p.m.
On Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Hi!
The sr core cookbook has lots of empty entries:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/core-cookbook/devel
Whereas the K core cookbook is rather full:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:1.5.x
I think most of the parameters still have the same meaning. I can
volunteer on merging cookbook docu from K to SR, and try to get missing
docu from the NEWS file. But in the end one of the core developers
(Andrei? Jan?) should verify if the doc is correct?
That's great, I'll try to verify it.
The biggest problem would be how to keep it in sync.
We should also mark the options that can be changed after start-up, at
runtime.
For example a lot of the core options can be changed at runtime, either
using core as the config group, or the transport (tcp or sctp).
E.g.:
debug -> sercmd cfg.set_now_int core debug 5
tcp_connect_timeout -> sercmd cfg.set_now_int tcp connect_timeout 2
udp_mtu -> sercmd cfg.set_now_int core udp_mtu 1300
One way to see all the options acessible using the cfg framework and
defined in the core is to start sr, loading the cfg_rpc and ctl modules
and then run:
sercmd cfg.list | egrep "core|tcp|sctp"
but note that not all the options can be changed, some are read-only.
sercmd cfg.help <group> <option> might help
(e.g. sercmd cfg.help core udp_mtu).
NEWS should help too (at least all the new options added that can be
changed at runtime are "marked").
Andrei
3 Jul
3 Jul
4:43 p.m.
Hi Andrei!
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
One way to see all the options acessible using the cfg
framework and
defined in the core is to start sr, loading the cfg_rpc and ctl modules
and then run:
sercmd cfg.list | egrep "core|tcp|sctp"
Does this command return all the available parameters, or only the
parameters which can be changed on-the-fly?
regards
klaus
5:42 p.m.
On Jul 03, 2009 at 15:43, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Hi Andrei!
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
Only options that can be read via the cfg. framework, both read-only and
writable.
There are still config options that are not registered with the config
framework (some of them do not make sense. other were forgotten a.s.o).
Andrei
One way to see all the options acessible using the
cfg framework and
defined in the core is to start sr, loading the cfg_rpc and ctl modules
and then run:
sercmd cfg.list | egrep "core|tcp|sctp"
Does this command return all the available parameters, or only the
parameters which can be changed on-the-fly?
5621
days inactive
5631
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion -
Victor Pascual Ávila