THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#313 - DNS failover bugs User who did this - Jasmin Schnatterbeck (jasmin) ---------- if that is intended, what is the reason for the original (non failover) request to make it behave differently (= use received socket if possible)? In my opinion it makes no sense to make orginal request behave differently than failover requests regarding the selection of send sockets.... failover means only contact another destination but do not change the rules for e.g. select the send socket. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=313#comment9… You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.