Hello,
The memcached module cannot be built for "stock" Enterprise Linux 6 because the versions of libmemcached/memcached that come with EL6 are the wrong ones.
Does anyone know what the right versions are, and is it worth updating the module documentation to specify them? That way if someone using RedHat or CentOS wants to use the memcached module at least they know what version to download and build.
Regards,
Peter
Hi Peter,
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly in version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still 0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include in 4.1 release?
Best, Charles
On 20 October 2013 22:57, Peter Dunkley peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.netwrote:
Hello,
The memcached module cannot be built for "stock" Enterprise Linux 6 because the versions of libmemcached/memcached that come with EL6 are the wrong ones.
Does anyone know what the right versions are, and is it worth updating the module documentation to specify them? That way if someone using RedHat or CentOS wants to use the memcached module at least they know what version to download and build.
Regards,
Peter
-- Peter Dunkley Technical Director Crocodile RCS Ltd
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Hello,
I believe it is fine to amend or correct documentation during the freeze.
It would certainly be helpful if the libmemcached requirement in the docs said version 0.38 or above.
Regards,
Peter
On 21 October 2013 10:03, Charles Chance charles.chance@sipcentric.comwrote:
Hi Peter,
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly in version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still 0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include in 4.1 release?
Best, Charles
On 20 October 2013 22:57, Peter Dunkley peter.dunkley@crocodilertc.netwrote:
Hello,
The memcached module cannot be built for "stock" Enterprise Linux 6 because the versions of libmemcached/memcached that come with EL6 are the wrong ones.
Does anyone know what the right versions are, and is it worth updating the module documentation to specify them? That way if someone using RedHat or CentOS wants to use the memcached module at least they know what version to download and build.
Regards,
Peter
-- Peter Dunkley Technical Director Crocodile RCS Ltd
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ. _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013, 10:03:46 schrieb Charles Chance:
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly in version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still 0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include in 4.1 release?
Hi Charles,
yes, the signatures changed unfortunately. Its fine to improve the documentation at any time. With regards to the change, maybe its possible to add some #ifdef around it if libmemcache export its internal version somehow.
Regards,
Henning Westerholt
Hi Henning,
The library exports constants LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_STRING and LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_HEX so it seems it would be possible, if you think it's really necessary?
I have updated the docs for now and will try to look more into it when I get a spare moment.
Best regards,
Charles
On 21 October 2013 11:53, Henning Westerholt hw@kamailio.org wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013, 10:03:46 schrieb Charles Chance:
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly
in
version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still
0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include
in
4.1 release?
Hi Charles,
yes, the signatures changed unfortunately. Its fine to improve the documentation at any time. With regards to the change, maybe its possible to add some #ifdef around it if libmemcache export its internal version somehow.
Regards,
Henning Westerholt
Just my opinion, but this will allow CentOS and RedHat based systems to make sure of memcached. This would not be a bad thing if the change is easy to make.
Regards,
Peter
On 21 October 2013 14:24, Charles Chance charles.chance@sipcentric.comwrote:
Hi Henning,
The library exports constants LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_STRING and LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_HEX so it seems it would be possible, if you think it's really necessary?
I have updated the docs for now and will try to look more into it when I get a spare moment.
Best regards,
Charles
On 21 October 2013 11:53, Henning Westerholt hw@kamailio.org wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013, 10:03:46 schrieb Charles Chance:
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed
slightly in
version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still
0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to
include in
4.1 release?
Hi Charles,
yes, the signatures changed unfortunately. Its fine to improve the documentation at any time. With regards to the change, maybe its possible to add some #ifdef around it if libmemcache export its internal version somehow.
Regards,
Henning Westerholt
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Hi all,
Just wanted to say that any addition to the memcached module or its documentation is very useful to us. We use libmemcached-1.0.17 and as far as I know there is no CentOS RPM for it. Thank you, Charles!
Regards, Dragos
On Monday, October 21, 2013 3:24 PM, Charles Chance charles.chance@sipcentric.com wrote:
Hi Henning,
The library exports constants LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_STRING and LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_HEX so it seems it would be possible, if you think it's really necessary?
I have updated the docs for now and will try to look more into it when I get a spare moment.
Best regards,
Charles
On 21 October 2013 11:53, Henning Westerholt hw@kamailio.org wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013, 10:03:46 schrieb Charles Chance:
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly in version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still 0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include in 4.1 release?
Hi Charles,
yes, the signatures changed unfortunately. Its fine to improve the documentation at any time. With regards to the change, maybe its possible to add some #ifdef around it if libmemcache export its internal version somehow.
Regards,
Henning Westerholt
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Henning,
Would you like to review the attached?
Regards,
Charles
On 21 October 2013 15:07, Dragos Oancea droancea@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just wanted to say that any addition to the memcached module or its documentation is very useful to us. We use libmemcached-1.0.17 and as far as I know there is no CentOS RPM for it. Thank you, Charles!
Regards, Dragos
On Monday, October 21, 2013 3:24 PM, Charles Chance < charles.chance@sipcentric.com> wrote: Hi Henning,
The library exports constants LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_STRING and LIBMEMCACHED_VERSION_HEX so it seems it would be possible, if you think it's really necessary?
I have updated the docs for now and will try to look more into it when I get a spare moment.
Best regards,
Charles
On 21 October 2013 11:53, Henning Westerholt hw@kamailio.org wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Oktober 2013, 10:03:46 schrieb Charles Chance:
The signatures of the custom memory allocator callbacks changed slightly
in
version 0.38 of libmemcached, so I believe this is the minimum required. Unfortunately it seems the version included in the EL6 base is still
0.31 :/
I can quickly add this info to the docs - is there still time to include
in
4.1 release?
Hi Charles,
yes, the signatures changed unfortunately. Its fine to improve the documentation at any time. With regards to the change, maybe its possible to add some #ifdef around it if libmemcache export its internal version somehow.
Regards,
Henning Westerholt
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, 01:29:22 schrieb Charles Chance:
Would you like to review the attached? [patch]
Hi Charles,
thank you - looks so far good to me. Could you maybe add also the doxygen documentation to the _compat function as well? Just copy the existing content and adapt it a bit. Then it should be fine to commit it.
Cheers,
Henning
Now that we have backwards compatibility with older library versions, I guess I can remove the minimum requirement again from the docs - does anyone see a problem with doing so?
Cheers,
Charles
On 24 October 2013 11:42, Henning Westerholt hw@kamailio.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013, 01:29:22 schrieb Charles Chance:
Would you like to review the attached? [patch]
Hi Charles,
thank you - looks so far good to me. Could you maybe add also the doxygen documentation to the _compat function as well? Just copy the existing content and adapt it a bit. Then it should be fine to commit it.
Cheers,
Henning
Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013, 15:43:10 schrieb Charles Chance:
Now that we have backwards compatibility with older library versions, I guess I can remove the minimum requirement again from the docs - does anyone see a problem with doing so?
Hi Charles,
no, just revert the doc change again.
Cheers,
Henning
-
Charles Chance -
Dragos Oancea -
Henning Westerholt -
Peter Dunkley