14 Oct
2009
14 Oct
'09
4:53 p.m.
I am testing serial forking timers with the merged tm module and
noticed that we have INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST defined, in addition to
IN_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT.
INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST does not seem to be used anywhere neither in
sip-router nor in kamailio. Is this a relict and we can potentionally
remove it and keep INV_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT only, or do I miss something?
-- Jan
14 Oct
14 Oct
10:13 p.m.
Jan Janak writes:
INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST does not seem to be used
anywhere neither in
sip-router nor in kamailio. Is this a relict and we can potentionally
remove it and keep INV_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT only, or do I miss something?
jan,
i also did some checking and didn't find INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST used. if
i remember correctly, its idea was to allow longer wait for the first
contacts to respond.
looks like it can be removed from the source.
-- juha
10:26 p.m.
El Miércoles, 14 de Octubre de 2009, Juha Heinanen escribió:
Jan Janak writes:
Doesn't exist an AVP for that?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST does not seem to be used
anywhere neither in
sip-router nor in kamailio. Is this a relict and we can potentionally
remove it and keep INV_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT only, or do I miss something?
jan,
i also did some checking and didn't find INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST used. if
i remember correctly, its idea was to allow longer wait for the first
contacts to respond.
15 Oct
15 Oct
3:13 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
El Miércoles, 14 de Octubre de 2009, Juha Heinanen
escribió:
Yes, we are talking about a define in the source code.
-- Jan
PS: Didn't you promise me not to remove my e-mail address from the
list of recipients? ;-)
Jan Janak writes:
Doesn't exist an AVP for that? INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST does not seem to be used
anywhere neither in
sip-router nor in kamailio. Is this a relict and we can potentionally
remove it and keep INV_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT only, or do I miss something?
jan,
i also did some checking and didn't find INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST used. if
i remember correctly, its idea was to allow longer wait for the first
contacts to respond.
8:41 a.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
no there does not exit an AVP for that and therefore also the constant
can be removed.
-=- juha
i also did
some checking and didn't find INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST used. if
i remember correctly, its idea was to allow longer wait for the first
contacts to respond.
Doesn't exist an AVP for that?
3:18 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Jan Janak writes:
OK, as far as I can tell it is exactly what INV_FR_TIME_OUT is for
too, so I will remove the redundant define.
-- Jan
INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST does not seem to be used
anywhere neither in
sip-router nor in kamailio. Is this a relict and we can potentionally
remove it and keep INV_FR_TIME_OUT_NEXT only, or do I miss something?
jan,
i also did some checking and didn't find INV_FR_TIME_OUT_FIRST used. if
i remember correctly, its idea was to allow longer wait for the first
contacts to respond.
looks like it can be removed from the source.
5518
days inactive
5519
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak -
jh＠tutpro.com