### Description
TLSF mem manager accounting for wrong values
was trying to debug a crash and this popped up.
using a lot of small allocs until pkg_alloc returns NULL (when exhausted)
when NULL is returned the memory **used+overhead** exceeds the heap allocated.
<!--
-->
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
use frequent small memory allocs until pool is exausted (returns NULL) , check tlsf
status.
static void do_test_mem()
{
void* chunk;
tlsf_t pool = NULL;
size_t total = 16 * 1024 * 1024;
size_t half = 8 * 1024 * 1024;
size_t sz = 6;
int x;
void* mem = malloc(total);
char* mem2 = tlsf_cast(char*, tlsf_cast(ptrdiff_t, mem) + half);
memset(mem2, 'X', half);
assert(*mem2 == 'X');
pool = tlsf_create_with_pool(mem, half);
do { chunk = tlsf_malloc(pool, sz); } while(chunk != NULL);
tlsf_status(pool);
for(x=0; x < half; x++) {
assert(*mem2 == 'X');
mem2++;
}
free(mem);
}
<!--
If the issue can be reproduced, describe how it can be done.
-->
<!--
If you got a core dump, use gdb to extract troubleshooting data - full backtrace,
local variables and the list of the code at the issue location.
gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile
bt full
info locals
list
If you are familiar with gdb, feel free to attach more of what you consider to
be relevant.
-->
```
heap size= **8388592**
used= **6285144**, used+overhead=**12578696**, free=**18446744073705361512**, fragments=0
max used (+overhead)=12578696, max fragments=1
Free blocks matrix ('.': none, 'X': between 2^X and (2^(X+1)-1) free
blocks, X=A..Z, A=0, B=1, ...)
first-level: 32 block list arrays between 2^fl and
2^(fl+1) bytes (fl=8..39)
v second-level: 32 block lists between 2^fl+sl*2^(fl-5)
and 2^fl+(sl+1)*2^(fl-5)-1 bytes (sl=0..31)
0|................................|
1|................................|
2|................................|
3|................................|
4|................................|
5|................................|
6|................................|
7|................................|
8|................................|
9|................................|
10|................................|
11|................................|
12|................................|
13|................................|
14|................................|
15|................................|
16|................................|
17|................................|
18|................................|
19|................................|
20|................................|
21|................................|
22|................................|
23|................................|
24|................................|
25|................................|
26|................................|
27|................................|
28|................................|
29|................................|
30|................................|
31|................................|
```
#### Log Messages
<!--
Check the syslog file and if there are relevant log messages printed by Kamailio, add them
next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
identical to reproduce step when calling mem debug on a running instance
```
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull
request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
```
* **Kamailio Version** - built from master
```
* **Operating System**:
<!--
Details about the operating system, the type: Linux (e.g.,: Debian 8.4, Ubuntu 16.04,
CentOS 7.1, ...), MacOS, xBSD, Solaris, ...;
Kernel details (output of `uname -a`)
-->
```
CentOS7 and alpine
```
## comments
heap size= **8388592** shouldn't it be **8388608** ?
used+overhead=**12578696** misleading
free=**18446744073705361512** misleading, looks like it has a negative value
the map doesn't look ok (or i'm not understanding what it should show), its the
same output before the alloc and after.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2628