[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
24 Sep
2021
24 Sep
'21
11:12 p.m.
### Description
Hi,
I've pushed some production traffic over latest 5.5.2 release on top of rtpengine
connected over websocket ( jus ws://xxx.xx.xx.xx) .
`modparam("rtpengine", "wsapi", "lwsc")`
but from time to time I can see following error and rtpengine_manage fails
```
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> lwsc [lwsc_mod.c:367]: ksr_lwsc_callback(): losing read
buffer of 4096 bytes
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3008]: send_rtpp_command():
mismatched cookie in websocket response
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2678]: rtpp_function_call(): no
available proxies
```
RTT towards rtpengine ~100-150ms
#### Debugging Data
#### Log Messages
```
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: New request -
M=INVITE R=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain
F=sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain
IP=10.23.136.115:5060 (10.23.136.115:5060) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Add to rr
sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain =>
c2lwOmNiMmU5NjRmLTFlYjctNDFmZS1hN2QzLTVmYWZlYmY0ZjNjOUBiZ2ZteC5jcmF6eWNhbGwuY29t
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTPEngineID
bgfmx.localdomain set from header to 3 ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Generated MOS A
label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888 - a324492e-ea41-44c1-982e-8397799a08b1
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Generated MOS B
label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888 - 8882300b-c07e-4f45-a864-1158b8412b60
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: SIP > WebRTC
Sep 24 19:42:58 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTP Selected
ws://xx.xx.xx.xx:22222
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Fix SDP BUNDLE for
iOS devices
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15905]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: stored transaction
[36958:1549764233] sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 =>
sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;transport=ws
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply - S=100 -
Trying M=INVITE IP=<null>:<null> (10.23.245.162:29794)
ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply from
websocket to SIP: 100 M=INVITE R=<null> F=sip:+XXXXX@bgfmx.localdomain
T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain IP=10.23.136.115:5060
(10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply - S=180 -
Ringing M=INVITE IP=<null>:<null> (10.23.245.162:29794)
ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply from
websocket to SIP: 180 M=INVITE R=<null> F=sip:+XXXXX@bgfmx.localdomain
T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain IP=10.23.136.115:5060
(10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply - S=200 - OK
M=INVITE IP=<null>:<null> (10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [INVITE
bgfmx.localdomain_654888 10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply from
websocket to SIP: 200 M=INVITE R=<null> F=sip:+XXXXX@bgfmx.localdomain
T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain IP=10.23.136.115:5060
(10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: New request - M=ACK
R=sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;alias=10.23.245.162~29794~5;transport=ws
F=sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain
IP=10.23.136.115:5060 (10.23.136.115:5060) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Desination WS - lookup
sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Restored from RR header 15j11kooqfes.invalid
-RTPEngineID 3 inst:<null> ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists A label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- a324492e-ea41-44c1-982e-8397799a08b1
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists B label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- 8882300b-c07e-4f45-a864-1158b8412b60
Sep 24 19:42:59 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15907]: INFO: [ACK bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: stored transaction
[<null>:<null>] sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 =>
sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;transport=ws
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: New request - M=INFO
R=sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;alias=10.23.245.162~29794~5;transport=ws
F=sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain
IP=10.23.136.115:5060 (10.23.136.115:5060) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Desination WS - lookup
sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Restored from RR header 15j11kooqfes.invalid
-RTPEngineID 3 inst:<null> ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists A label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- a324492e-ea41-44c1-982e-8397799a08b1
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists B label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- 8882300b-c07e-4f45-a864-1158b8412b60
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: SIP-INFO received start recording
ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:43:13 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15908]: INFO: [INFO bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTPENGINE STATS:
mos_average/mos_average_packetloss/mos_average_jitter/mos_average_roundtrip
4.3/0/0/143763
Sep 24 19:44:16 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: New request - M=BYE
R=sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;alias=10.23.245.162~29794~5;transport=ws
F=sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain
IP=10.23.136.115:5060 (10.23.136.115:5060) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:16 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Restored from RR header 15j11kooqfes.invalid
-RTPEngineID 3 inst:<null> ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:16 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists A label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- 8882300b-c07e-4f45-a864-1158b8412b60
Sep 24 19:44:16 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists B label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- a324492e-ea41-44c1-982e-8397799a08b1
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> lwsc [lwsc_mod.c:367]: ksr_lwsc_callback(): losing read
buffer of 4096 bytes
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3008]: send_rtpp_command():
mismatched cookie in websocket response
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2678]: rtpp_function_call(): no
available proxies
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTPENGINE STATS:
mos_average/mos_average_packetloss/mos_average_jitter/mos_average_roundtrip
<null>/<null>/<null>/<null>
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Stop mediaproxy for all branches -
R=sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;alias=10.23.245.162~29794~5;transport=ws
ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2678]: rtpp_function_call(): no
available proxies
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2678]: rtpp_function_call(): no
available proxies
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Desination WS - lookup
sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Restored from RR header 15j11kooqfes.invalid
-RTPEngineID 3 inst:<null> ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists A label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- 8882300b-c07e-4f45-a864-1158b8412b60
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: Exists B label for bgfmx.localdomain_654888
- a324492e-ea41-44c1-982e-8397799a08b1
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: SIP > WebRTC
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: ERROR: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2678]: rtpp_function_call(): no
available proxies
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTPEngine Failover no X-RTPEngineID-failover
header failing to 1
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: post RTP
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: RTP Selected ws://52.209.63.240:22222
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15906]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.136.115:5060@udp]--> <script>: stored transaction [36971:163653632]
sip:+XXXXX@172.31.12.244 => sip:474tnvd1@15j11kooqfes.invalid;transport=ws
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply - S=200 - OK M=BYE
IP=<null>:<null> (10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
Sep 24 19:44:17 kamailio5 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15922]: INFO: [BYE bgfmx.localdomain_654888
10.23.245.162:29794@ws]--> <script>: Reply from websocket to SIP: 200 M=BYE
R=<null> F=sip:+XXXXX@bgfmx.localdomain
T=sip:cb2e964f-1eb7-41fe-a7d3-5fafebf4f3c9@bgfmx.localdomain IP=10.23.136.115:5060
(10.23.245.162:29794) ID=bgfmx.localdomain_654888
```
RTPEngine log
```
Sep 24 19:42:58 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Received command 'offer' from 52.49.87.3:1816
Sep 24 19:42:58 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: NOTICE: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[core] Creating new call
Sep 24 19:42:58 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Replying to 'offer' from 52.49.87.3:1816 (elapsed time 0.001349 sec)
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888 port
32358]: [crypto] DTLS-SRTP successfully negotiated using AEAD_AES_256_GCM
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888 port
32358]: [crypto] DTLS-SRTP successfully negotiated using AEAD_AES_256_GCM
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Received command 'answer' from 52.49.87.3:2192
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[core] Received answer SDP with media ID ('audio') when no media ID was offered
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[crypto] DTLS: Peer certificate accepted
Sep 24 19:42:59 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Replying to 'answer' from 52.49.87.3:2192 (elapsed time 0.000811 sec)
Sep 24 19:43:03 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888 port
32358]: [core] Confirmed peer address as 103.102.144.211:52093
Sep 24 19:43:03 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888 port
32380]: [core] Confirmed peer address as 52.209.63.245:56876
Sep 24 19:43:03 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888 port
32381]: [core] Confirmed peer address as 52.209.63.245:56877
Sep 24 19:43:13 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Received command 'start recording' from 52.49.87.3:30337
Sep 24 19:43:13 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: ERR: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]: [core]
Call recording requested, but no spool directory configured
Sep 24 19:43:13 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Replying to 'start recording' from 52.49.87.3:30337 (elapsed time
0.000009 sec)
Sep 24 19:43:13 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Received command 'query' from 52.49.87.3:30337
Sep 24 19:43:13 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Replying to 'query' from 52.49.87.3:30337 (elapsed time 0.000131 sec)
Sep 24 19:44:16 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Received command 'query' from 52.49.87.3:43726
Sep 24 19:44:16 ip-172-28-11-189 rtpengine[18874]: INFO: [bgfmx.localdomain_654888]:
[control] Replying to 'query' from 52.49.87.3:43726 (elapsed time 0.000156 sec)
```
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.5.2 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY,
USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled with gcc 10.2.1
```
* **Operating System**:
```
root@kamailio5:~# kamailio -v
version: kamailio 5.5.2 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY,
USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535,
DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled with gcc 10.2.1
root@kamailio5:~# uname -a
Linux kamailio5 5.10.0-8-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-08-03) x86_64
GNU/Linux
root@kamailio5:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Release: 11
Codename: bullseye
root@kamailio5:~#
```
rtpengine version on media proxy
```
ii ngcp-rtpengine 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 all NGCP
RTP/media proxy - meta package
ii ngcp-rtpengine-daemon 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 amd64 proxy
for RTP and media streams used in NGCP, userspace part
ii ngcp-rtpengine-iptables 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 amd64
IPtables extension module for the kernel-space NGCP media proxy
ii ngcp-rtpengine-kernel-dkms 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 all
IPtables kernel module for the NGCP media proxy - DKMS
ii ngcp-rtpengine-kernel-source 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 all
IPtables kernel module for the NGCP media proxy - source
ii ngcp-rtpengine-recording-daemon 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 amd64
recording daemon for RTP and media streams
ii ngcp-rtpengine-utils 10.0.1.4+0~mr10.0.1.4 all scripts
and Perl modules for NGCP rtpengine
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862
24 Sep
24 Sep
11:23 p.m.
Hi @marcinkowalczyk , this doesn't appear to be a bug and I would encourage you to use
the kamailio mailing list (or other forum such as matrix) for support. You may also want
to look at https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine for issues with rtpengine itself.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-926898584
11:23 p.m.
Closed #2862.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#event-5358207577
25 Sep
25 Sep
8:09 a.m.
@fredposner in my opinion this is bug, as when kamailio rtpengine module works in udp mode
(-ng protocol) everyting works like a charm. Problem is when kamailio rtpengine module
uses ws connection towards rtpengine itself.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-927012330
9:44 a.m.
Reopened #2862.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#event-5359267937
9:45 a.m.
Yes, it indeed looks like a bug. RTT 100-150ms sounds like a bit more than usual, do you
have some kind of packet-loss if you debug e.g. with MTR to the rtpengine location for
example?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-927021038
11:06 a.m.
Hi Henning,
After full night of production traffic I discovered this is not related to RTT, as
happens to low-latency proxies too (~10ms no packet loss).
Interesting part is that it hapens 99.9% in BYE so I think it may be related to
rtpengine_delete() and fetching call stats like described in docs
```
5.5. rtpengine_delete([flags])
Tears down the RTP proxy session for the current call. This populates the statistics
pseudovariables (such “mos_min_pv” etc).
```
last night statistics - 83k calls:
```
root@kamailio5:~# grep -c 'ksr_lwsc_callback(): losing read buffer of 4096 bytes'
/var/log/syslog
1433
root@kamailio5:~#
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-927080111
11:09 a.m.
Thanks for the additional feedback. Maybe @rfuchs can comment. It would be probably a good
idea to look with this information in the rtpengine issue tracker (link was posted
already).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-927083984
27 Sep
27 Sep
3:44 p.m.
Looking at the code, I think this might be a bug in the `lwsc` module, triggered by more
data coming in over the websocket than is being consumed by the lwsc receiver.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-927836128
1 Oct
1 Oct
1:44 p.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
Can you test with master branch or the commit referenced above? If fixes it, then I will
backport.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-932120329
8 Oct
8 Oct
11:23 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
@marcinkowalczyk: have you had the chance to test with the patch referenced above?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-938445466
11:36 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
Hi Daniel,
I'm on holidays till Monday, I will check after weeeknd!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-938454041
19 Oct
19 Oct
10:21 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
Hi @miconda
I've just installed latest nightly build (deb version: kamailio 5.6.0-dev1). I will
share results within couple of hours
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-946434394
20 Oct
20 Oct
3:45 p.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
@miconda seems issue is fixed. I've running traffic (50-50) with affected 5.5 and
nightly 5.6 and it's ok with 5.6. Can you backport to 5.5 ? Thanks!
```
root@kamailio56:~# grep ksr_lwsc_callback /var/log/syslog
root@kamailio56:~#
```
```
root@kamailio5:~# grep -c ksr_lwsc_callback /var/log/syslog
3709
root@kamailio5:~#
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-947630063
5 Nov
5 Nov
10:52 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
Closed #2862.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#event-5572868413
10:52 a.m.
New subject: [kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine/lwsc -> send_rtpp_command(): mismatched cookie in websocket response (#2862)
This got out of my sight -- just backported. Thanks for testing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2862#issuecomment-961689832
1115
days inactive
1157
days old
15 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Fred Posner
-
Henning Westerholt
-
marcinkowalczyk
-
Richard Fuchs