THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#351 - registrar: process expired contacts first
User who did this - VĂctor Seva (linuxmaniac)
----------
Created new db_update_ucontact_instance and call it instead of db_update_ucontact_addr.
This fixes the update on the ddbb. If I send two different register messages for the
second, first with Contact:
<sip:testuser1003@127.0.0.1:50602;ob>;expires=593;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:C3DD6013-20E8-40E3-8EA2-5849B02ED0C4>";reg-id=1
and the second with Contact: <sip:testuser1003@127.0.0.1:6666;ob>;expires=0
I get the right result: testuser1003@127.0.0.1:50602;ob on mem and ddbb
But If I send the second message with both contacts... I get none on mem or ddbb.
----------
One or more files have been attached.
More information can be found at the following URL:
https://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=351#comment…
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking
system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future,
you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.