1 Jul
2009
1 Jul
'09
7:35 a.m.
Revision: 5889
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5889&view=rev
Author: ibc_sf
Date: 2009-07-01 11:35:07 +0000 (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
- Revert of last commit in kamailio.cfg (it was incorrect).
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/etc/kamailio.cfg
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's
largest Open Source development site.
1 Jul
1 Jul
9:04 a.m.
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge
the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Jan.
On 01-07 11:35, Inaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Revision: 5889
http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5889&view=rev
Author: ibc_sf
Date: 2009-07-01 11:35:07 +0000 (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
-----------
- Revert of last commit in kamailio.cfg (it was incorrect).
Modified Paths:
--------------
trunk/etc/kamailio.cfg
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's
largest Open Source development site.
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
10:50 a.m.
2009/7/1 Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge
the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm
confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
4:06 p.m.
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/7/1 Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>rg>:
I will be called 3.0 and will be based on sr
regards
klaus
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge
the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm
confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
5:48 a.m.
On 01-07 16:50, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/7/1 Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Since the next version will be based on the shared core, it will draw the code
from the git repository. If you want to have your changes included in the next
release, then, please, put them in the git repository as well.
Some time ago we had automatic synchronization going on, but we stopped that
after making most of the code compile and agreed that we will continue working
primarily in the git repository.
The SVN repository still receives updates to the 1.5 branch, but the trunk
should no longer receive updates (they should go to git).
Jan.
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge
the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm
confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
6:24 a.m.
El Jueves, 2 de Julio de 2009, Jan Janak escribió:
On 01-07 16:50, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
ok, thanks for the explanation. I'll do it (as soon as I learn using Git XD).
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>
2009/7/1 Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>rg>:
Since the next version will be based on the shared core, it will draw the
code from the git repository. If you want to have your changes included in
the next release, then, please, put them in the git repository as well.
Some time ago we had automatic synchronization going on, but we stopped
that after making most of the code compile and agreed that we will continue
working primarily in the git repository.
The SVN repository still receives updates to the 1.5 branch, but the trunk
should no longer receive updates (they should go to git). Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no
longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm
confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
5671
days inactive
5672
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Inaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion