Revision: 5889 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5889&view=rev Author: ibc_sf Date: 2009-07-01 11:35:07 +0000 (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
Log Message: ----------- - Revert of last commit in kamailio.cfg (it was incorrect).
Modified Paths: -------------- trunk/etc/kamailio.cfg
This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Jan.
On 01-07 11:35, Inaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Revision: 5889 http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/openser/?rev=5889&view=rev Author: ibc_sf Date: 2009-07-01 11:35:07 +0000 (Wed, 01 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
- Revert of last commit in kamailio.cfg (it was incorrect).
Modified Paths:
trunk/etc/kamailio.cfgThis was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
2009/7/1 Jan Janak jan@iptel.org:
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/7/1 Jan Janak jan@iptel.org:
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
I will be called 3.0 and will be based on sr
regards klaus
El Miércoles, 1 de Julio de 2009, Klaus Darilion escribió:
I will be called 3.0 and will be based on sr
You? really? so... Klaus 3.0?
XD
On 01-07 16:50, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/7/1 Jan Janak jan@iptel.org:
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
Since the next version will be based on the shared core, it will draw the code from the git repository. If you want to have your changes included in the next release, then, please, put them in the git repository as well.
Some time ago we had automatic synchronization going on, but we stopped that after making most of the code compile and agreed that we will continue working primarily in the git repository.
The SVN repository still receives updates to the 1.5 branch, but the trunk should no longer receive updates (they should go to git).
Jan.
El Jueves, 2 de Julio de 2009, Jan Janak escribió:
On 01-07 16:50, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/7/1 Jan Janak jan@iptel.org:
Inaki,
Shouldn't these commits go into the git repository instead? We no longer merge the SVN trunk into the git repository.
Probably I must read about the inmediate future of Kamailio since I'm confused about the new version (1.6) of Kamailio based in SR.
Since the next version will be based on the shared core, it will draw the code from the git repository. If you want to have your changes included in the next release, then, please, put them in the git repository as well.
Some time ago we had automatic synchronization going on, but we stopped that after making most of the code compile and agreed that we will continue working primarily in the git repository.
The SVN repository still receives updates to the 1.5 branch, but the trunk should no longer receive updates (they should go to git).
ok, thanks for the explanation. I'll do it (as soon as I learn using Git XD).
-
Inaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion