30 Jun
2009
30 Jun
'09
12:22 a.m.
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search
in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ;
else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
btw: shouldn't be the module rather identical in ser and K? Maybe
someone from the transnexus can handle this?
regards
klaus
1 Jul
1 Jul
4:21 p.m.
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search
in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ;
else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Jan.
4:29 p.m.
Jan Janak schrieb:
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool
kit?)
klaus
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search
in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ;
else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
4:48 p.m.
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that case I
suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan.
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool
kit?) Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to
search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk"
; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
11:13 p.m.
Hi Di-Shi!
We are in the process of merging Kamailio modules with ser modules
(sip-router.org). We wonder what is the difference of the OSP module in
ser and Kamailio.
Is there a reason why we should keep both modules? Or are they identical
so we can remove one of them?
thanks
Klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that case I
suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan. On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Probably it is the same. In
Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool
kit?) Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to
search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk"
; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference
between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed? 
2 Jul
2 Jul
3:46 a.m.
Hi Klaus,
All SER applications (SER, Kamailio and OpenSIPS) should use the same OSP
module in theory. There are some difference either because of the update
schedule or resource. You may keep the OSP module in Kamailio because it is
newer than the OSP module in SER.
Thanks,
Di-Shi Sun.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
To: <di-shi(a)transnexus.com>
Cc: "sr-dev" <sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: [sr-dev] build problems: ser's osp module
Hi Di-Shi!
We are in the process of merging Kamailio modules with ser modules
(sip-router.org). We wonder what is the difference of the OSP module in
ser and Kamailio.
Is there a reason why we should keep both modules? Or are they identical
so we can remove one of them?
thanks
Klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that
case I
suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan. On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to
> search in /usr/lib too:
>
> LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk"
> ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
>
>
> Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this
needed?
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool
kit?)
5625
days inactive
5628
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Di-Shi Sun -
Jan Janak -
Klaus Darilion