Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
btw: shouldn't be the module rather identical in ser and K? Maybe someone from the transnexus can handle this?
regards klaus
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Jan.
Jan Janak schrieb:
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool kit?)
klaus
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool kit?)
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that case I suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan.
Hi Di-Shi!
We are in the process of merging Kamailio modules with ser modules (sip-router.org). We wonder what is the difference of the OSP module in ser and Kamailio.
Is there a reason why we should keep both modules? Or are they identical so we can remove one of them?
thanks Klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool kit?)
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that case I suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan.
Hi Klaus,
All SER applications (SER, Kamailio and OpenSIPS) should use the same OSP module in theory. There are some difference either because of the update schedule or resource. You may keep the OSP module in Kamailio because it is newer than the OSP module in SER.
Thanks,
Di-Shi Sun.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Klaus Darilion" klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at To: di-shi@transnexus.com Cc: "sr-dev" sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:13 AM Subject: Re: [sr-dev] build problems: ser's osp module
Hi Di-Shi!
We are in the process of merging Kamailio modules with ser modules (sip-router.org). We wonder what is the difference of the OSP module in ser and Kamailio.
Is there a reason why we should keep both modules? Or are they identical so we can remove one of them?
thanks Klaus
Jan Janak wrote:
On 01-07 15:29, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Jan Janak schrieb:
On 29-06 23:22, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
in ser's osp module Makefile these condition should be adopted to search in /usr/lib too:
LIBS=$(shell if [ -f /usr/local/lib/libosptk.a ]; then echo "-losptk" ; else echo "-losp" ; fi)
Or make it like K's osp module: use always -losptk
What is the difference between osptk and osp library? Why is this needed?
Probably it is the same. In Debian it osp library is called osptk (tool kit?)
Ohh, I see, I had not idea it was already included in debian. In that case I suggest that we hardwire the Makefile to osptk, if nobody disagrees?
Jan.