1 Jun
2009
1 Jun
'09
8:35 p.m.
if i remember correctly, k told the config file line number where an
error occurred and also the name of the function that issued it. sr
doesn't do so. see previous message about deprecated pv syntax warnings
and now also this:
Jun 1 20:24:49 localhost /usr/sbin/sip-router[14871]: ERROR: utils [utils.c:244]: result
pvar is not writeble
in general, how can i know where the problem occurred?
in this particular case, i know where the error comes from:
http_query("some_query", "$ru");
the same statement works fine in k. why is $ru not writeble? can i
replace it with some other form of request-uri variable?
-- juha
1 Jun
1 Jun
10:30 p.m.
On 06/01/2009 08:35 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
if i remember correctly, k told the config file line
number where an
error occurred and also the name of the function that issued it. sr
doesn't do so. see previous message about deprecated pv syntax warnings
and now also this:
Jun 1 20:24:49 localhost /usr/sbin/sip-router[14871]: ERROR: utils [utils.c:244]: result
pvar is not writeble
in general, how can i know where the problem occurred?
in this particular case, i know where the error comes from:
http_query("some_query", "$ru");
the same statement works fine in k. why is $ru not writeble? can i
replace it with some other form of request-uri variable?
there is a problem with the common fixup system -- I think Andrei
implemented it.
K functions expect a pointer to pv_spec_t and now a pv_spec_t** is
returned when fixup_pvar() is used. fparam_t.v.pvs is a pv_spec_t* and
the *param (from fixup call) is filled with &fparam_t.v.
A solution would be to add a void *fixed_param to fparam_t that is
either set to &fparam_t.v or to a filed insind 'u' union, and this one
is used to fill the 'param'.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
10:35 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
K functions expect a pointer to pv_spec_t and now a
pv_spec_t** is
returned when fixup_pvar() is used. fparam_t.v.pvs is a pv_spec_t* and
the *param (from fixup call) is filled with &fparam_t.v.
A solution would be to add a void *fixed_param to fparam_t that is
either set to &fparam_t.v or to a filed insind 'u' union, and this one
is used to fill the 'param'.
i hope that not all modules that accept pv arguments would need to be
updated. let me know when this works and i'll resume my tests.
-- juha
11:11 p.m.
On 06/01/2009 10:35 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Here is a patch that should fix, if you want to test.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
K functions expect a pointer to pv_spec_t and now
a pv_spec_t** is
returned when fixup_pvar() is used. fparam_t.v.pvs is a pv_spec_t* and
the *param (from fixup call) is filled with &fparam_t.v.
A solution would be to add a void *fixed_param to fparam_t that is
either set to &fparam_t.v or to a filed insind 'u' union, and this one
is used to fill the 'param'.
i hope that not all modules that accept pv arguments would need to be
updated. let me know when this works and i'll resume my tests.
2 Jun
2 Jun
8:28 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Here is a patch that should fix, if you want to test.
daniel,
thanks for the patch. after i applied it, sr didn't anymore complain
about unwriteable pv. my sip-router is now running, but i have not
tested yet if it does something useful.
-- juha
11:29 a.m.
Hello,
On 06/01/2009 08:35 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
if i remember correctly, k told the config file line
number where an
error occurred and also the name of the function that issued it.
yes, it printed
the line number - the action structure in K has a field
'line' -- I couldn't find it.
That is very useful for fixup or runtime errors, I would add it in SR if
no one has something against or a better option.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
3 Jun
3 Jun
8:35 p.m.
On Jun 02, 2009 at 11:29, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 06/01/2009 08:35 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Well kamailio did have the line number for actions, sip-router has
complete position information for expressions :-)
if i remember correctly, k told the config file
line number where an
error occurred and also the name of the function that issued it.
yes, it printed
the line number - the action structure in K has a field
'line' -- I couldn't find it.
That is very useful for fixup or runtime errors, I would add it in SR if
no one has something against or a better option.
We should add it, but it's not so simple. We should have complete
position information, like we have for expressions (start line, start
column, end line and end column -- struct cfg_pos in route_struct.h). To
add this we need to propagate this information through all the parsing
rules and add it somehow to the basic tokens, which would be very
time consuming.
So feel free to add it if you add full position info.
Andrei
9:14 p.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
Well kamailio did have the line number for actions,
sip-router has
complete position information for expressions :-)
in order to find where the errors come from, line numbers are more
useful than line positions. if you don't know the line, position info
is not very valuable.
and in this concrete case there was no position info either:
Jun 1 20:11:42 localhost /usr/sbin/sip-router[14204]: WARNING: <core>
[usr_avp.c:882]: i: and s: avp name syntax is deprecated!
-- juha
5651
days inactive
5653
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
jh＠tutpro.com