14 Oct
2013
14 Oct
'13
8:52 a.m.
according to sl readme, send_reply() can be called from branch route.
however, when i tried with recent master i got:
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: : tm [tm.c:1342]: w_t_reply(): BUG:
w_t_reply entered in unsupported mode
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: ERROR: sl [sl.c:277]: send_reply():
failed to reply stateful (tm)
is this a bug in code or readme?
-- juha
14 Oct
14 Oct
1:20 p.m.
Hello,
indeed, in the source code t_reply() throws an error if used from branch
route, but sl_send_reply() is fine. Given that send_reply() is a wrapper
around the two, the code needs to be reviewed to see why t_reply() is
not allowed in branch route and find a solution for it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/14/13 7:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
according to sl readme, send_reply() can be called
from branch route.
however, when i tried with recent master i got:
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: : tm [tm.c:1342]: w_t_reply(): BUG:
w_t_reply entered in unsupported mode
Oct 14 08:47:34 rautu /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[11203]: ERROR: sl [sl.c:277]: send_reply():
failed to reply stateful (tm)
is this a bug in code or readme?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
8:01 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
indeed, in the source code t_reply() throws an error
if used from branch
route, but sl_send_reply() is fine. Given that send_reply() is a wrapper
around the two, the code needs to be reviewed to see why t_reply() is
not allowed in branch route and find a solution for it.
should i add a tracker item on this?
-- juha
17 Oct
17 Oct
6:17 p.m.
On 10/14/13 7:01 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I hope not to forget about it - in my short to-do list, but it is
still
large. You can remind me if I forget or just add it to the tracker.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28; Miami, Nov 18-20, 2013
- more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
indeed, in the source code t_reply() throws an
error if used from branch
route, but sl_send_reply() is fine. Given that send_reply() is a wrapper
around the two, the code needs to be reviewed to see why t_reply() is
not allowed in branch route and find a solution for it.
should i add a tracker
item on this?
4055
days inactive
4058
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Juha Heinanen