### Description We've got a situation where we use t_send_reply() to generate early 100 Trying, before an operation that might have a small delay. The result of this operation might lead to a change which adds parameters to ruri-user. This works as expected for normal operations, but when calling ds_next_dst()/ds_next_domain() the change to $rU is lost. ### Troubleshooting I then noticed that this is because t_send_reply() indirectly does a t_newtran() before change to $rU. If it's done in the opposite order, everything works as expected. A workaround is to use for example sl_send_reply() and t_set_auto_inv_100(0), which works for me. However, I'm unsure if this revert of user is expected behaviour? #### Reproduction $rU = $rU + ";npdi"; .. ds_select_dst(..); then trigger a condition which executes failure_route and then use ds_next_dst() to fork serially. $rU is then reverted to the original value in outgoing INVITE. ### Additional Information Reproduced in master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3388 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3388(a)github.com>