14 Sep
2016
14 Sep
'16
11:55 a.m.
Sipwise hat ON:
We have more than one server and we need to keep things in db in order to share sca
subscription/appearance between servers
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781
28 Oct
28 Oct
5:49 p.m.
Any thoughts @TheGrandWazoo ?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-256940663
6:01 p.m.
I assume you mean more then one kamailio server in a load-balancing type environment?
If so, that was on my radar for future enhancements but I am glad someone is finally
looking at this module and making some improvements. Thank you so much!!!! This module is
one that I use at many customers and has been the bane of my existence with the hold
seizes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-256944525
24 Feb
24 Feb
1:03 p.m.
@miconda I'm thinking if ``sca`` can be redesigned and integrate the subscription part
of it as a module like ``presence_sca`` using ``presence`` infrastructure.
The thing is that ``presence`` has support for process only the body not for the headers
and ``sca`` is adding ``Call-Info`` header to a bodyless ``NOTIFY`` reply.
Is it worth the trouble to implement that in ``presence`` or should I just keep hacking
into ``sca`` directly?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-282253011
30 Mar
30 Mar
5:14 p.m.
2017-02-24 11:03 GMT+01:00 Victor Seva <notifications(a)github.com>om>:
@miconda <https://github.com/miconda> I'm
thinking if sca can be
redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like
presence_sca using presence infrastructure.
The thing is that presence has support for process only the body not for
the headers and sca is adding Call-Info header to a bodyless NOTIFY reply.
Is it worth the trouble to implement that in presence or should I just
keep hacking into sca directly?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-282253011>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZXYM7H46BGg_b5LwD_-oHN7rgfQbks5rfqsGgaJpZM4J8iuL>
.
any thoughts?
Cheers,
Victor
8 Nov
8 Nov
10:55 a.m.
This issue is stale because it has been open 6 weeks with no activity. Remove stale label
or comment or this will be closed in 2 weeks.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-1801263381
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/781/1801263381(a)github.com>
23 Nov
23 Nov
5:40 a.m.
Closed #781 as not planned.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#event-11042724279
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issue/781/issue_event/11042724279(a)github.com>
365
days inactive
2991
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
github-actions[bot] -
Kevin Scott Adams
-
Victor Seva
-
Victor Seva