Thanks for the patch. One note about -- use tab based indentation for
patches to existing modules, to keep the code looking coherent. I can
apply the patch and reset the formatting this time, but have in mind for
the future.
Otherwise, patch looks ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25/08/14 15:32, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote:
Patch for flag parsing attached.
2014-08-22 18:48 GMT+04:00 Alekzander Spiridonov <alekz(a)li.ru
<mailto:alekz@li.ru>>:
Ok, so at the moment src supports the following options:
if (len>1 && (str1[1]=='p' || str1[1]=='P'))
state |= DS_PROBING_DST;
if(str1[0]=='i' || str1[0]=='I')
state |= DS_INACTIVE_DST;
else if(str1[0]=='t' || str1[0]=='T')
state |= DS_TRYING_DST;
else if(str1[0]=='d' || str1[0]=='D')
state = DS_DISABLED_DST;
else if(str1[0]=='p' || str1[0]=='P')
state = DS_INACTIVE_DST|DS_PROBING_DST;
I do believe that flag still should be single letter, so I'd
suggest removing the first "if" since we still have the last "else
if". What do you think about that?
Also I'd add "A" option to this list.
2014-08-22 18:26 GMT+04:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
On 22/08/14 13:32, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote:
One more thing I've figured out:
In dispatcher module guide there is a way to mark dst as
Active, though in src w_ds_mark_dst1 has no such option.
On the other hand, w_ds_mark_dst1 has an option to mark dst
as "admin disabled" that is not documented in the guide.
Could you clarify what is the expected behavior so I could
send a fix for that.
The purpose of that function is to be able to set a
destination in one of supported states:
- completely disabled (admin disabled) -- I guess is 'd' --
not used and no chance to activate it automatically upon a
successful probing request (actually no probing will be done)
- inactive state - is not used currently, but if in probing
mode, it can be activated automatically if a probe request is
answered
- active state - used currently
The probing mode that comes as a flag, is related to whether
to send periodically (probe) requests to check if targets are
online.
Trying wasn't coded by me (iirc :-) ), but I think the purpose
was to still keep the target in active mode until a certain
number of failures occur and then make it inactive (or disabled).
If you find discrepancies in the code, let us know -- of
course, patches are more than welcome!
Cheers,
Daniel
2014-08-22 13:25 GMT+04:00 Alekzander Spiridonov <alekz(a)li.ru
<mailto:alekz@li.ru>>:
Hi Daniel,
1. Yep, had the same concern, but somehow missed the
app_lua. Fixed as you've described.
2. Done.
New patch attached.
2014-08-21 20:19 GMT+04:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>:
Hello,
thanks for sending the patch! Two remarks for now:
1) you changed the inter-module API prototype for
ds_select_dst_f, respectively:
typedef int (*ds_select_dst_f)(struct sip_msg *msg,
int set,
- int alg, int mode);
+ int alg, unsigned int limit, int mode);
I think the reason for that function is an export to
app_lua (and maybe other embedded languages). With
this change, things get broken there. I would do:
- rename the function ds_select_dst() to
ds_select_dst_limit()
- add ds_select_dst() as a wrapper function calling
the new ds_select_dst_limit()
The API stay unchanged, and eventually one can add a
new member for ds_select_dst_limit() when needed
Otherwise, the change of ds_select_dst() prototype
should involve reviewing other modules and seeing if
people are happy with this change, because it breaks
existing embedded scripts.
2) You need to document the new functions exported to
kamailio config, in
modules/dispatcher/doc/dispatcher_admin.xml
Once the patch is overall ok, I can commit it to the
repository.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 21/08/14 17:40, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote:
Hi list,
I'd like to propose a patch that allows user to
limit the number of items that appears in dst_avp
after ds_select_dst or ds_select_domain call.
There are some use cases when one could have couple
of dst sets and would like to failover from the
first to another without checking all items but have
just 3 or 4 of them dead in a row.
What do you think about that?
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 -http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
<mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
-http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 -http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov
--
Best regards,
Alekzander Spiridonov