30 Mar
2009
30 Mar
'09
4:06 p.m.
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length. This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
30 Mar
30 Mar
4:14 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
i vote for returning an error.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value
locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
this is such a radical bug in the UA that fixing it in the proxy does
not make sense.
-- juha
4:20 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On 30-03 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length. This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Yes, I agree, returning an error seems appropriate to me.
Jan.
5:24 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls.
Andrei
5:46 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Hello,
On 03/30/2009 05:24 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
Others reaction was to 400-reply the request, being a basic bug that
should be fixed in uac side...
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I haven't checked the modules in ser, just the data_lump.c file for
anchor_lump() in sip-router core. In k most of the modules takes the
length from header. Probably a wrapper that corrects it would be good.
The issue remains, is this a case of runtime abort()?
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls.
6:03 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On Mar 30, 2009 at 17:46, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Others reaction was to 400-reply the request, being a basic bug that
should be fixed in uac side...
It costs us very little to fix it and so I think it's better to be nice,
even with broken UACs.
If one wants to drop them, it can always use the sanity module.
Andrei
Hello,
On 03/30/2009 05:24 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
It's an abort() to quickly catch bugs (the content length value should
always be checked and _never_ trusted) and to force people to fix them.
We could eliminate the abort() but then the incentive for fixing the
real bug will be reduced :-)
On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I haven't checked the modules in ser, just the data_lump.c file for
anchor_lump() in sip-router core. In k most of the modules takes the
length from header. Probably a wrapper that corrects it would be good.
The issue remains, is this a case of runtime abort()? Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls.
6:12 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
It's an abort() to quickly catch bugs (the content
length value should
always be checked and _never_ trusted) and to force people to fix
them.
We could eliminate the abort() but then the incentive for fixing the
real bug will be reduced :-)
it is very bad idea to make proxy owner to pay for bugs in UAs. if
proxy returns an error to UA, it is the best incentive for the UA owner
to fix the bug.
-- juha
6:15 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On Mar 30, 2009 at 18:12, Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
It's not a bug in the UA, it's a bug in the proxy code that uses a
Content-Length received from the network without checking if it's valid.
All such code instances must be changed and Content-Length must always
be checked and never trusted, before using it for anything.
That's what the abort() is for.
So removing the abort() it would fix the symptom, but not the real bug.
Andrei
It's an abort() to quickly catch bugs (the
content length value should
always be checked and _never_ trusted) and to force people to fix
them.
We could eliminate the abort() but then the incentive for fixing the
real bug will be reduced :-)
it is very bad idea to make proxy owner to pay for bugs in UAs. if
proxy returns an error to UA, it is the best incentive for the UA owner
to fix the bug.
6:27 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
It's not a bug in the UA, it's a bug in the
proxy code that uses a
Content-Length received from the network without checking if it's
valid.
if that is the case, then i agree with you. proxy code should not do
such thing and if it does t is clearly a bug in the proxy code. i
wonder in how many places k currently trusts content-length.
-- juha
9:48 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On 03/30/2009 06:27 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
This trust of content-length needs be fixed I agree. However it looks to
me too radical to call abort() on purpose. A developer can fix that
quickly, but users having deployed the sip router cannot coper properly
with. Like in buffer overflow cases, the code detects the case and
returns error, does not call abort(). I see this being similar. I would
avoid abort() on purpose anywhere at runtime, but write error messages,
avoid crash and keep running.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
It's not a bug in the UA, it's a bug in
the proxy code that uses a
Content-Length received from the network without checking if it's
valid.
if that is the case, then i agree with you. proxy code should not do
such thing and if it does t is clearly a bug in the proxy code. i
wonder in how many places k currently trusts content-length.
10:21 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On Mar 30, 2009 at 21:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/30/2009 06:27 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
If the abort() wouldn't have been there, you wouldn't have discovered
this bug.
In general abort() is used only for important bugs and one shouldn't
expect the proxy to survive using the api in the wrong way.
We could try to workaround SIGSEGV too, but it's much better to let it
coredump.
What can we do is to use some define, e.g.:
#ifndef RELEASE
abort()
#endif
but this still would have delayed finding this bug a lot.
Andrei
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
This trust of content-length needs be fixed I agree. However it looks to
me too radical to call abort() on purpose. A developer can fix that
quickly, but users having deployed the sip router cannot coper properly
with. Like in buffer overflow cases, the code detects the case and
returns error, does not call abort(). I see this being similar. I would
avoid abort() on purpose anywhere at runtime, but write error messages,
avoid crash and keep running. It's not a bug in the UA, it's a bug in
the proxy code that uses a
Content-Length received from the network without checking if it's
valid.
if that is the case, then i agree with you. proxy code should not do
such thing and if it does t is clearly a bug in the proxy code. i
wonder in how many places k currently trusts content-length.
10:33 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On 03/30/2009 10:21 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009 at 21:48, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
well, this is questionable, lot of bugs are reported by error messages
in syslog.
On 03/30/2009 06:27 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
If the abort() wouldn't have been there, you wouldn't have discovered
this bug.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
This trust of content-length needs be fixed I agree. However it looks to
me too radical to call abort() on purpose. A developer can fix that
quickly, but users having deployed the sip router cannot coper properly
with. Like in buffer overflow cases, the code detects the case and
returns error, does not call abort(). I see this being similar. I would
avoid abort() on purpose anywhere at runtime, but write error messages,
avoid crash and keep running.
It's not a bug in the UA, it's a bug in
the proxy code that uses a
Content-Length received from the network without checking if it's
valid.
if that is the case, then i agree with you. proxy code should not do
such thing and if it does t is clearly a bug in the proxy code. i
wonder in how many places k currently trusts content-length.
In general abort() is used only for important bugs and
one shouldn't
expect the proxy to survive using the api in the wrong way.
We could try to workaround SIGSEGV too, but it's much better to let it
coredump.
What can we do is to use some define, e.g.:
#ifndef RELEASE
abort()
#endif
maybe this is better, a sr_abort(code) marcro that does either "abort()"
or "return code" depending of compile mode (release or not).
but this still would have delayed finding this bug a
lot.
The bug was identified manly by the syslog message printed before the
abort(), not by the crash ...
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
31 Mar
31 Mar
11:57 a.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How can this be fixed automatically? How will the proxy know when then
body ends and the next message starts?
regards
klaus
PS: IMO the server should respond with "400 wrong content length" if
accessing of the body is required and the length is wrong
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls.
12:14 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
On Mar 31, 2009 at 10:57, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
If the destination is tcp or tls, but the source is not (source is udp
or sctp).
One more clarification: it does not the fix the value of the content
length visible from sr, it will fix the Content-Length header in the
forwarded message.
On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
How can this be fixed automatically? How will the proxy know when then
body ends and the next message starts? Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls.
regards
klaus
PS: IMO the server should respond with "400 wrong content length" if
accessing of the body is required and the length is wrong
Why would anyone use content-length for accessing the body in the first
place? You always know (in sr/ser/k) where the message ends
(msg->buf+msg->len) and where the body starts (get_body(msg)).
Andrei
1:18 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
hmmm.
If input protocol is stream oriented, I guess the body-len is always
correct, as SR has to use the content-length header to get the body.
When using UDP the question is: What should be used as body boundary -
from CRLFCRLF to end of datagram or from CRLFCRLF "content-length"
bytes? In any case, if SR detects a problem that those 2 methods return
different result IMO rejecting with 400 is best.
klaus
Stream oriented
On Mar 31, 2009 at 10:57, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
Ups. I have overseen the word "destination", sorry.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul schrieb:
If the destination is tcp or tls, but the source is not (source is udp
or sctp).
One more clarification: it does not the fix the value of the content
length visible from sr, it will fix the Content-Length header in the
forwarded message. On Mar 30, 2009 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
How can this be fixed automatically? How will the proxy know when then
body ends and the next message starts? Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length.
It's true that anchor_lump() calls abort if
the offset passed to it is
outside the message, but I don't see where anchor_lump() is called with
a value depending on Content-Length (at least in sip-router and ser).
This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
It's fixed automatically in
sip-router, if the destination protocol is
tcp or tls. regards
klaus
PS: IMO the server should respond with "400 wrong content length" if
accessing of the body is required and the length is wrong
Why would anyone use content-length for accessing the body in the first
place? You always know (in sr/ser/k) where the message ends
(msg->buf+msg->len) and where the body starts (get_body(msg)).
Andrei
30 Mar
30 Mar
5:37 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] content length
2009/3/30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length. This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Is this error the cause of so many segmentfaults in a reported bug?:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2649470&group_id=1…
I've tested it by sending spoofed SIP messages via UDP with wrong
Content-Lenght and it's forwarded properly by Kamailio trunk (before
the today commits), without warnings or errors.
How to reproduce the problem?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
5:48 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
On 03/30/2009 05:37 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/3/30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
was content length higher than body length?
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
Hello,
the data lumps system is critically affected if content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length. This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Is this error the cause of so many segmentfaults in a reported bug?:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2649470&group_id=1…
I've tested it by sending spoofed SIP messages via UDP with wrong
Content-Lenght and it's forwarded properly by Kamailio trunk (before
the today commits), without warnings or errors.
How to reproduce the problem?
5:55 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
2009/3/30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
I've sent a MESSAGE (UDP) with Content-Length lower and also higher
than the real body size. Nothing occurred...
But let me please check it again.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
I've
tested it by sending spoofed SIP messages via UDP with wrong
Content-Lenght and it's forwarded properly by Kamailio trunk (before
the today commits), without warnings or errors.
How to reproduce the problem?
was content length higher than body length?
5:57 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
On 03/30/2009 05:55 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/3/30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
I've sent a MESSAGE (UDP) with Content-Length lower and also higher
than the real body size. Nothing occurred...
But let me please check it again.
wrong test. Send an invite and call force_rtp_proxy().
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
I've
tested it by sending spoofed SIP messages via UDP with wrong
Content-Lenght and it's forwarded properly by Kamailio trunk (before
the today commits), without warnings or errors.
How to reproduce the problem?
was content length higher than body length?
6:04 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
2009/3/30 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
wrong test. Send an invite and call force_rtp_proxy().
ohhh, right!
When Content-Lenght is higher than the real body size it causes a segmentfault!
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28414] CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: offset exceeds
message size (762 > 662) aborting...
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: child process 28414
exited by a signal 6
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: core was generated
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: terminating due to SIGCHLD
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28491] CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 14
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
6:27 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
When Content-Lenght is higher than the real body size
it causes a segmentfault!
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28414] CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: offset exceeds
message size (762 > 662) aborting...
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: child process 28414
exited by a signal 6
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: core was generated
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: terminating due to SIGCHLD
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28491] CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 14
I've checked the last commit fixing this problem. The SDP is in fact
modified in the request (not entirely since "a=nortpproxy" line is not
added) but force_rtpproxy() returns -1.
Is it the expected behaviour? I would prefer that SDP is not modified at all.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
6:33 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
> When Content-Lenght is higher than the real body size it causes a segmentfault!
>
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28414] CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: offset exceeds
> message size (762 > 662) aborting...
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: child process 28414
> exited by a signal 6
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: core was generated
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: terminating due to SIGCHLD
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28491] CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 14
Let me a question:
Does this bug mean that *any* OpenSer/Kamailio version using
"force_rtpproxy()" would crash if Content-Length is higher than the
real body size?
If so it's good time for individual consultans XD
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
9:44 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
On 03/30/2009 06:33 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
:-) kind of ... fixed now on latest three versions of kamailio, going to
backport back to 1.3 and 1.2.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
> When Content-Lenght is higher than the real body size it causes a segmentfault!
>
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28414] CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: offset exceeds
> message size (762 > 662) aborting...
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: child process 28414
> exited by a signal 6
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: core was generated
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: terminating due to SIGCHLD
> Mar 30 17:03:24 [28491] CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 14
>
Let me a question:
Does this bug mean that *any* OpenSer/Kamailio version using
"force_rtpproxy()" would crash if Content-Length is higher than the
real body size?
If so it's good time for individual consultans XD
9:43 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
On 03/30/2009 06:27 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/3/30 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>et>:
too late to revert some previous changes... :-)
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
SIP Router Masterclass - Kamailio (OpenSER) Training
http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
When Content-Lenght is higher than the real body
size it causes a segmentfault!
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28414] CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: offset exceeds
message size (762 > 662) aborting...
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: child process 28414
exited by a signal 6
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: core was generated
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28412] INFO:core:handle_sigs: terminating due to SIGCHLD
Mar 30 17:03:24 [28491] CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 14
I've checked the last commit fixing this problem. The SDP is in fact
modified in the request (not entirely since "a=nortpproxy" line is not
added) but force_rtpproxy() returns -1.
Is it the expected behaviour? I would prefer that SDP is not modified at all.
8:11 p.m.
New subject: [SR-Dev] [Kamailio-Devel] content length
On Monday 30 March 2009 15:06:05 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
the data lumps system is critically affected if
content-length is wrong
for UDP. The anchor_lump() calls abort() in the case content-length is
higher than actually body length. This can be prevented by called sanity
module to check the content length, however, I consider being too
drastic to have abort in such case, it would be better to return an
error and let the sip router process other messages. Opinions?
Checking sip-router sources, it faces same issue.
Another option would be to correct the C-L value locally, but the right
one is that phone vendor fixes its side.
The proxy could also jump to error_route when it find such an error. The admin
can then decide what to do with the message.
--
Alex Hermann
5718
days inactive
5719
days old
24 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Alex Hermann -
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak -
jh＠tutpro.com -
Klaus Darilion