10 Jun
2009
10 Jun
'09
5:04 p.m.
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
10 Jun
10 Jun
6:23 p.m.
Hello,
On 06/10/2009 05:04 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
I think is too much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category
"Modules" with appropriate module name in summary should be ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
6:35 p.m.
2009/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
On 06/10/2009 05:04 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Yes, I agree, but under my experience in Kamailio/OpenSer sourceforge
tracker, most of the bugs related to modules don't include the module
name in the summary :(
Anyway I agree with you, 100 categories would be too much.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
I think is too much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category "Modules"
with appropriate module name in summary should be ok. 
6:38 p.m.
Agreed that a catagory for each module is not a practical approach....
And what about categories like:
- compilation;
- script;
- parameter;
- run-time;
- etc, etc, etc
at least it would permit filter problems by 'moment'...
Edson.
Iñaki Baz Castillo escreveu:
2009/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
On 06/10/2009 05:04 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Yes, I agree, but under my experience in Kamailio/OpenSer sourceforge
tracker, most of the bugs related to modules don't include the module
name in the summary :(
Anyway I agree with you, 100 categories would be too much.
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
I think is too much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category "Modules"
with appropriate module name in summary should be ok.
6:44 p.m.
Just notice that, using anonymous access, there are only "linux" and
"mac" as OS options.
Shouldn't include Solaris/Open Solaris?
Edson.
Edson - Lists escreveu:
Agreed that a catagory for each module is not a
practical approach....
And what about categories like:
- compilation;
- script;
- parameter;
- run-time;
- etc, etc, etc
at least it would permit filter problems by 'moment'...
Edson.
Iñaki Baz Castillo escreveu:
2009/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
On 06/10/2009 05:04 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Yes, I agree, but under my experience in Kamailio/OpenSer sourceforge
tracker, most of the bugs related to modules don't include the module
name in the summary :(
Anyway I agree with you, 100 categories would be too much.
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
I think is too much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category
"Modules"
with appropriate module name in summary should be ok.
6:48 p.m.
2009/6/10 Edson - Lists <4lists(a)gmail.com>om>:
Agreed that a catagory for each module is not a
practical approach....
And what about categories like:
- compilation;
- script;
- parameter;
- run-time;
- etc, etc, etc
at least it would permit filter problems by 'moment'...
Sincerelly I wouldn't know which of the above categories I should
choose for most of the bugs I've reported XD
IMHO it should be really simpler.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
6:39 p.m.
On Wed, June 10, 2009 5:35 pm, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi Inaki,
well, this should be rather easy to fix, even if its forgotten from the
original reporter. ;-) At least as an admin it should be possible to edit
the summary.
Henning
I think is too
much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category
"Modules"
with appropriate module name in summary should be ok.
Yes, I agree, but under my experience in Kamailio/OpenSer sourceforge
tracker, most of the bugs related to modules don't include the module
name in the summary :(
6:47 p.m.
2009/6/10 Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de>de>:
On Wed, June 10, 2009 5:35 pm, Iñaki Baz Castillo
wrote:
Hi Inaki,
well, this should be rather easy to fix, even if its forgotten from the
original reporter. ;-) At least as an admin it should be possible to edit
the summary.
Right, this would be the best approach :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
I think
is too much to have one for each module -- there are over 100
modules. Maybe tm could be separate, otherwise, a single category
"Modules"
with appropriate module name in summary should be ok.
Yes, I agree, but under my experience in Kamailio/OpenSer sourceforge
tracker, most of the bugs related to modules don't include the module
name in the summary :( 
7:56 p.m.
On 10-06 16:04, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
Hi, the tracker allows categories (of course).
What do you thing about creating a category for each module, other for
core and some other called "other"?
Is it necessary to create them now? We can add categories on the fly as
needed, also depending on the amount of bug reports received.
Jan.
5648
days inactive
5648
days old
8 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Edson - Lists -
Henning Westerholt -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Jan Janak