Hi Juha, It must be something silly that I am doing then, but I can't see what. This code fragment: if (msg->contact || parse_headers(msg, HDR_CONTACT_F, 0) != -1) { if (parse_contact(msg->contact) < 0) { LM_ERR("parsing Contact: header body\n"); return 0; } contact = ((contact_body_t *) msg->contact->parsed)->contacts; if (!contact) { LM_ERR("empty Contact:\n"); return 0; } if (parse_uri(contact->uri.s, contact->uri.len, &puri) < 0) { LM_ERR("parsing Contact-URI\n"); return 0; } if (parse_params(&puri.params, CLASS_CONTACT, &hooks, &params) != 0) { LM_ERR("parsing Contact-URI parameters\n"); return 0; } if (msg->REQ_METHOD == METHOD_REGISTER && hooks.contact.reg_id) { LM_INFO("found REGISTER with ;reg-id paramter on" "Contact-URI - outbound used\n"); return 1; } Prints out the last diagnostic when reg-id is a Contact-URI parameter, but not a Contact: header parameter. I've no idea why, but this is obviously not right. Any ideas? Peter -- Peter Dunkley Technical Director Crocodile RCS Ltd

Hello, On 1/2/13 12:15 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote: above you parse the Contact URI parameters, not the contact header parameters. That's why you don't get the reg-id, because is a header parameter. The parse_contact() parses the header parameters and makes them available in (contact_t*)->params, with some hooks in special fields for most used parameters, see parser/contact/contact.h for the structure. It is no need parse additionally the contact header parameters. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda