### Description See `lock_hash` in `h_table.c`: ```C void lock_hash(int i) { int mypid; mypid = my_pid(); if (likely(atomic_get(&_tm_table->entries[i].locker_pid) != mypid)) { lock(&_tm_table->entries[i].mutex); atomic_set(&_tm_table->entries[i].locker_pid, mypid); } else { /* locked within the same process that called us*/ _tm_table->entries[i].rec_lock_level++; } } ``` Flowing lines of code do not guarantee atomicity and I think it is not safe: * atomic_get(&_tm_table->entries[i].locker_pid) != mypid * lock(&_tm_table->entries[i].mutex) * atomic_set(&_tm_table->entries[i].locker_pid, mypid) Would you mind solving my confusion? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3083 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3083(a)github.com>