propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

git:master:b81dff6a: core: unified...

git:master:1e3e5217: app_python...

Luis Azedo

19 Feb 2015 19 Feb '15

2:44 a.m.

Hi, sometimes UAs do subscriptions using mixed case uris which most of the times leads to NOTIFY messages not getting to the UA. if used with subs_db_mode = 3 and a case insensitive dbengine it works. however, if we use other value on subs_db_mode it doesn't work or behaves poorly (missing cache) should we make string insensitive matches in presence module for uris ? i marked the 10 occurrences with >>> Thank You [lazedo@dev-01 presence]# grep strncmp . -R ./subscribe.c: if(ev_param->name.len== 2 && strncmp(ev_param->name.s, "id", 2)== 0) ./utils_func.h: if(strncmp(ip.s, "sip:", 4)!=0) ./hash.c: strncmp(s->callid.s, callid.s, callid.len)==0 && ./hash.c: strncmp(s->to_tag.s, to_tag.s, to_tag.len)==0 && ./hash.c: strncmp(s->from_tag.s, from_tag.s, from_tag.len)== 0) ./hash.c: && strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0) ./hash.c: && strncmp(s->callid.s,subs->callid.s,subs->callid.len)==0 ./hash.c: && strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0 ./hash.c: && strncmp(s->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.len)==0)

...

>> ./hash.c: if(strncmp(s->contact.s, subs->contact.s, subs->contact.len)) >>./hash.c: strncmp(p->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0 )

./presence.c: (reason.s && subs.reason.s && strncmp(reason.s, subs.reason.s,

...

>>./presence.c: strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.len)== 0 && >>./presence.c: strncmp(s->watcher_user.s, subs->watcher_user.s, s->watcher_user.len)== 0 && >>./presence.c: strncmp(s->watcher_domain.s,subs->watcher_domain.s,s->watcher_domain.len)==0)

./presence.c: if ((subs.reason.len == 12) && (strncmp(subs.reason.s, "polite-block", 12) == 0))

...

>>./presentity.c: strncmp(presentity->sender->s, sender.s, sender.len)== 0))

./event_list.c: if(sep && strncmp(sep+1, "winfo", 5)== 0) ./event_list.c: strncmp(p->name.s,ps->name.s, ps->name.len)== 0) ./event_list.c: strncmp(p->body.s,ps->body.s,ps->body.len)== 0))

...

>>./notify.c: strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,subs->pres_uri.len)== 0) >>./notify.c: strncmp(sender.s, contact->s, sender.len)== 0)

./notify.c: if( (etags.len == etag->len) && (strncmp(etags.s,

...

>>./notify.c: strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0)) || >>./notify.c: strncmp(sender->s, s->contact.s, sender->len)== 0))

./notify.c: subs->reason.len== 12 && strncmp(subs->reason.s, "polite-block", 12)== 0) ./notify.c: if(w->uri.len == wuri.len && strncmp(w->uri.s, wuri.s, wuri.len)== 0)

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 5.6 KB)

Show replies by date

Alex Balashov

19 Feb 19 Feb

2:45 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Does the SIP grammar consider differently-cased resource identifiers to be equivalent? On 02/18/2015 07:44 PM, Luis Azedo wrote:

...

Hi, sometimes UAs do subscriptions using mixed case uris which most of the times leads to NOTIFY messages not getting to the UA. if used with subs_db_mode = 3 and a case insensitive dbengine it works. however, if we use other value on subs_db_mode it doesn't work or behaves poorly (missing cache) should we make string insensitive matches in presence module for uris ? i marked the 10 occurrences with >>> Thank You [lazedo@dev-01 presence]# grep strncmp . -R ./subscribe.c:if(ev_param->name.len== 2 && strncmp(ev_param->name.s, "id", 2)== 0) ./utils_func.h:if(strncmp(ip.s, "sip:", 4)!=0) ./hash.c:strncmp(s->callid.s, callid.s, callid.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->to_tag.s, to_tag.s, to_tag.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->from_tag.s, from_tag.s, from_tag.len)== 0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->callid.s,subs->callid.s,subs->callid.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.len)==0)

>> ./hash.c:if(strncmp(s->contact.s, subs->contact.s, subs->contact.len)) >>./hash.c:strncmp(p->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0 )

./presence.c:(reason.s && subs.reason.s && strncmp(reason.s, subs.reason.s,

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,

subs->pres_uri.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_user.s, subs->watcher_user.s,

s->watcher_user.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_domain.s,subs->watcher_domain.s,s->watcher_domain.len)==0)

./presence.c: if ((subs.reason.len == 12) && (strncmp(subs.reason.s, "polite-block", 12) == 0))

>>./presentity.c:strncmp(presentity->sender->s, sender.s, sender.len)== 0))

./event_list.c:if(sep && strncmp(sep+1, "winfo", 5)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->name.s,ps->name.s, ps->name.len)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->body.s,ps->body.s,ps->body.len)== 0))

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,subs->pres_uri.len)== 0) >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender.s, contact->s, sender.len)== 0)

./notify.c:if( (etags.len == etag->len) && (strncmp(etags.s,

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0)) || >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender->s, s->contact.s, sender->len)== 0))

./notify.c:subs->reason.len== 12 && strncmp(subs->reason.s, "polite-block", 12)== 0) ./notify.c:if(w->uri.len == wuri.len && strncmp(w->uri.s, wuri.s, wuri.len)== 0) _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

Luis Azedo

3:52 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Hi Alex, i guess not. the user part is case sensitive. The URIs within each of the following sets are equivalent: sip:%61lice@atlanta.com;transport=TCP sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=tcp sip:carol@chicago.com sip:carol@chicago.com;newparam=5 sip:carol@chicago.com;security=on sip:biloxi.com;transport=tcp;method=REGISTER?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:biloxi.com;method=REGISTER;transport=tcp?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:alice@atlanta.com?subject=project%20x&priority=urgent sip:alice@atlanta.com?priority=urgent&subject=project%20x The URIs within each of the following sets are not equivalent: SIP:ALICE@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=udp (different usernames) sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=UDP sip:bob@biloxi.com (can resolve to different ports) sip:bob@biloxi.com:5060 ________________________________________ From: sr-dev [sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of Alex Balashov [abalashov(a)evaristesys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 4:45 PM To: sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Does the SIP grammar consider differently-cased resource identifiers to be equivalent? On 02/18/2015 07:44 PM, Luis Azedo wrote:

...

Hi, sometimes UAs do subscriptions using mixed case uris which most of the times leads to NOTIFY messages not getting to the UA. if used with subs_db_mode = 3 and a case insensitive dbengine it works. however, if we use other value on subs_db_mode it doesn't work or behaves poorly (missing cache) should we make string insensitive matches in presence module for uris ? i marked the 10 occurrences with >>> Thank You [lazedo@dev-01 presence]# grep strncmp . -R ./subscribe.c:if(ev_param->name.len== 2 && strncmp(ev_param->name.s, "id", 2)== 0) ./utils_func.h:if(strncmp(ip.s, "sip:", 4)!=0) ./hash.c:strncmp(s->callid.s, callid.s, callid.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->to_tag.s, to_tag.s, to_tag.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->from_tag.s, from_tag.s, from_tag.len)== 0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->callid.s,subs->callid.s,subs->callid.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.len)==0)

>> ./hash.c:if(strncmp(s->contact.s, subs->contact.s, subs->contact.len)) >>./hash.c:strncmp(p->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0 )

./presence.c:(reason.s && subs.reason.s && strncmp(reason.s, subs.reason.s,

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,

subs->pres_uri.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_user.s, subs->watcher_user.s,

s->watcher_user.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_domain.s,subs->watcher_domain.s,s->watcher_domain.len)==0)

./presence.c: if ((subs.reason.len == 12) && (strncmp(subs.reason.s, "polite-block", 12) == 0))

>>./presentity.c:strncmp(presentity->sender->s, sender.s, sender.len)== 0))

./event_list.c:if(sep && strncmp(sep+1, "winfo", 5)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->name.s,ps->name.s, ps->name.len)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->body.s,ps->body.s,ps->body.len)== 0))

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,subs->pres_uri.len)== 0) >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender.s, contact->s, sender.len)== 0)

./notify.c:if( (etags.len == etag->len) && (strncmp(etags.s,

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0)) || >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender->s, s->contact.s, sender->len)== 0))

Alex Balashov

3:53 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Then, why would we make this change? :-) -- Sent from my BlackBerry. Please excuse errors and brevity. Original Message From: Luis Azedo Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:52 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Hi Alex, i guess not. the user part is case sensitive. The URIs within each of the following sets are equivalent: sip:%61lice@atlanta.com;transport=TCP sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=tcp sip:carol@chicago.com sip:carol@chicago.com;newparam=5 sip:carol@chicago.com;security=on sip:biloxi.com;transport=tcp;method=REGISTER?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:biloxi.com;method=REGISTER;transport=tcp?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:alice@atlanta.com?subject=project%20x&priority=urgent sip:alice@atlanta.com?priority=urgent&subject=project%20x The URIs within each of the following sets are not equivalent: SIP:ALICE@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=udp (different usernames) sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=UDP sip:bob@biloxi.com (can resolve to different ports) sip:bob@biloxi.com:5060 ________________________________________ From: sr-dev [sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of Alex Balashov [abalashov(a)evaristesys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 4:45 PM To: sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Does the SIP grammar consider differently-cased resource identifiers to be equivalent? On 02/18/2015 07:44 PM, Luis Azedo wrote:

...

Hi, sometimes UAs do subscriptions using mixed case uris which most of the times leads to NOTIFY messages not getting to the UA. if used with subs_db_mode = 3 and a case insensitive dbengine it works. however, if we use other value on subs_db_mode it doesn't work or behaves poorly (missing cache) should we make string insensitive matches in presence module for uris ? i marked the 10 occurrences with >>> Thank You [lazedo@dev-01 presence]# grep strncmp . -R ./subscribe.c:if(ev_param->name.len== 2 && strncmp(ev_param->name.s, "id", 2)== 0) ./utils_func.h:if(strncmp(ip.s, "sip:", 4)!=0) ./hash.c:strncmp(s->callid.s, callid.s, callid.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->to_tag.s, to_tag.s, to_tag.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->from_tag.s, from_tag.s, from_tag.len)== 0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->callid.s,subs->callid.s,subs->callid.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.len)==0)

>> ./hash.c:if(strncmp(s->contact.s, subs->contact.s, subs->contact.len)) >>./hash.c:strncmp(p->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0 )

./presence.c:(reason.s && subs.reason.s && strncmp(reason.s, subs.reason.s,

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,

subs->pres_uri.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_user.s, subs->watcher_user.s,

s->watcher_user.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_domain.s,subs->watcher_domain.s,s->watcher_domain.len)==0)

./presence.c: if ((subs.reason.len == 12) && (strncmp(subs.reason.s, "polite-block", 12) == 0))

>>./presentity.c:strncmp(presentity->sender->s, sender.s, sender.len)== 0))

./event_list.c:if(sep && strncmp(sep+1, "winfo", 5)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->name.s,ps->name.s, ps->name.len)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->body.s,ps->body.s,ps->body.len)== 0))

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,subs->pres_uri.len)== 0) >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender.s, contact->s, sender.len)== 0)

./notify.c:if( (etags.len == etag->len) && (strncmp(etags.s,

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0)) || >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender->s, s->contact.s, sender->len)== 0))

-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/ _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Luis Azedo

3:59 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

i didn't actually said it in the previous post, but obviously dropping this. but are we ready to accept sip123(a)AbCd.com == sip:123@aBcD.com ? thoughts ? ________________________________________ From: sr-dev [sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of Alex Balashov [abalashov(a)evaristesys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 5:53 PM To: Luis Azedo Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Then, why would we make this change? :-) -- Sent from my BlackBerry. Please excuse errors and brevity. Original Message From: Luis Azedo Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:52 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Hi Alex, i guess not. the user part is case sensitive. The URIs within each of the following sets are equivalent: sip:%61lice@atlanta.com;transport=TCP sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=tcp sip:carol@chicago.com sip:carol@chicago.com;newparam=5 sip:carol@chicago.com;security=on sip:biloxi.com;transport=tcp;method=REGISTER?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:biloxi.com;method=REGISTER;transport=tcp?to=sip:bob%40biloxi.com sip:alice@atlanta.com?subject=project%20x&priority=urgent sip:alice@atlanta.com?priority=urgent&subject=project%20x The URIs within each of the following sets are not equivalent: SIP:ALICE@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=udp (different usernames) sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=UDP sip:bob@biloxi.com (can resolve to different ports) sip:bob@biloxi.com:5060 ________________________________________ From: sr-dev [sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of Alex Balashov [abalashov(a)evaristesys.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 4:45 PM To: sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Does the SIP grammar consider differently-cased resource identifiers to be equivalent? On 02/18/2015 07:44 PM, Luis Azedo wrote:

...

Hi, sometimes UAs do subscriptions using mixed case uris which most of the times leads to NOTIFY messages not getting to the UA. if used with subs_db_mode = 3 and a case insensitive dbengine it works. however, if we use other value on subs_db_mode it doesn't work or behaves poorly (missing cache) should we make string insensitive matches in presence module for uris ? i marked the 10 occurrences with >>> Thank You [lazedo@dev-01 presence]# grep strncmp . -R ./subscribe.c:if(ev_param->name.len== 2 && strncmp(ev_param->name.s, "id", 2)== 0) ./utils_func.h:if(strncmp(ip.s, "sip:", 4)!=0) ./hash.c:strncmp(s->callid.s, callid.s, callid.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->to_tag.s, to_tag.s, to_tag.len)==0 && ./hash.c:strncmp(s->from_tag.s, from_tag.s, from_tag.len)== 0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0) ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->callid.s,subs->callid.s,subs->callid.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.s,subs->to_tag.len)==0 ./hash.c:&& strncmp(s->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.s,subs->from_tag.len)==0)

>> ./hash.c:if(strncmp(s->contact.s, subs->contact.s, subs->contact.len)) >>./hash.c:strncmp(p->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0 )

./presence.c:(reason.s && subs.reason.s && strncmp(reason.s, subs.reason.s,

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,

subs->pres_uri.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_user.s, subs->watcher_user.s,

s->watcher_user.len)== 0 &&

>>./presence.c:strncmp(s->watcher_domain.s,subs->watcher_domain.s,s->watcher_domain.len)==0)

./presence.c: if ((subs.reason.len == 12) && (strncmp(subs.reason.s, "polite-block", 12) == 0))

>>./presentity.c:strncmp(presentity->sender->s, sender.s, sender.len)== 0))

./event_list.c:if(sep && strncmp(sep+1, "winfo", 5)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->name.s,ps->name.s, ps->name.len)== 0) ./event_list.c:strncmp(p->body.s,ps->body.s,ps->body.len)== 0))

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, subs->pres_uri.s,subs->pres_uri.len)== 0) >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender.s, contact->s, sender.len)== 0)

./notify.c:if( (etags.len == etag->len) && (strncmp(etags.s,

>>./notify.c:strncmp(s->pres_uri.s, pres_uri->s, pres_uri->len)== 0)) || >>./notify.c:strncmp(sender->s, s->contact.s, sender->len)== 0))

Olle E. Johansson

10:18 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

On 19 Feb 2015, at 02:59, Luis Azedo <luis(a)2600hz.com> wrote:

...

but are we ready to accept sip123(a)AbCd.com == sip:123@aBcD.com ?

The domain part is always case insensitive. AbCd.COM == abCD.cOm User names are not case insensitive. ALICE != Alice I think we have a setting to make it case insensitive in registrar/usrloc, but that's not compatible with the RFCs. /O

Juha Heinanen

3:56 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Luis Azedo writes:

...

i guess not. the user part is case sensitive.

by default, kamailio should obey standards. if you want to break from that, it needs to be done using a module variable. -- juha

Luis Azedo

4:09 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Hi Juha, so, would it be acceptable to introduce a param in module presence to allow case-insensitive matches on uris , preserving the current behaviour? we should consider creating a sip uri match function to be used in kamailio to fully comply with standards, the way we do it now sip123(a)AbCd.com != sip:123@aBcD.CoM and according to standards (if i understood correctly) they should be considered equal. also, if there are params in the uri, the order should also be irrelevant. ________________________________________ From: sr-dev [sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of Juha Heinanen [jh(a)tutpro.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 5:56 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [sr-dev] propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module Luis Azedo writes:

...

i guess not. the user part is case sensitive.

by default, kamailio should obey standards. if you want to break from that, it needs to be done using a module variable. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Juha Heinanen

4:28 a.m.

New subject: propose change strncmp to strncasecmp in presence module

Luis Azedo writes:

...

Hi Juha, so, would it be acceptable to introduce a param in module presence to allow case-insensitive matches on uris , preserving the current behaviour?

if there is a bug in current behavior that needs to be fixed. no param or variable is needed for that. my understanding based on rfc3261 is that hostpart of sip uri is case insensitive, but userpart is case sensitive: Comparison of the userinfo of SIP and SIPS URIs is case-sensitive. This includes userinfo containing passwords or formatted as telephone-subscribers. Comparison of all other components of the URI is case-insensitive unless explicitly defined otherwise. -- juha

3564

days inactive

3564

days old

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

Manage subscription

8 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

Alex Balashov
Juha Heinanen
Luis Azedo
Olle E. Johansson