Yes, just adding it now - the declared array is called
"rfc1918nets" -
should I change the name of the array or just add a comment for future
reference?
On 6 March 2014 11:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 04/03/14 18:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 04/03/14 13:11, Charles Chance wrote:
Hello All,
Any objections if I update nat_traversal module to include
CGN address space, similar to the patch submitted for
nathelper module (with the correct address range)? Or does
someone else have it in mind to do it?
go ahead and do it.
Are you planning to do it with backport for v4.1.2? Just checking,
because it will be released in few hours.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
--
*Charles Chance*
Managing Director
t. 0121 285 4400 m. 07932 063 891
www.sipcentric.com <http://www.sipcentric.com/>
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.
Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court
South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.