On 04/03/14 18:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Hello,

On 04/03/14 13:11, Charles Chance wrote:

...

Hello All,

Any objections if I update nat_traversal module to include CGN address space, similar to the patch submitted for nathelper module (with the correct address range)? Or does someone else have it in mind to do it?

go ahead and do it.

Are you planning to do it with backport for v4.1.2? Just checking, because it will be released in few hours.

Cheers, Daniel

On 06/03/14 14:19, Charles Chance wrote:

Yes, just adding it now - the declared array is called "rfc1918nets" - should I change the name of the array or just add a comment for future reference?

Up to you.

Daniel

On 6 March 2014 11:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

On 04/03/14 18:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

    Hello,

    On 04/03/14 13:11, Charles Chance wrote:


        Hello All,

        Any objections if I update nat_traversal module to include
        CGN address space, similar to the patch submitted for
        nathelper module (with the correct address range)? Or does
        someone else have it in mind to do it?

    go ahead and do it.

Are you planning to do it with backport for v4.1.2? Just checking,
because it will be released in few hours.


Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- *Charles Chance* Managing Director

t. 0121 285 4400 m. 07932 063 891

www.sipcentric.com http://www.sipcentric.com/

Follow us on twitter @sipcentric http://twitter.com/sipcentric

Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham B7 4EJ.