18 Feb
2011
18 Feb
'11
11:53 a.m.
Hi,
I have tested the STUN code in sip-router (enabled by make STUN=1) and it
became quite clear that this code is based on old I-D's and probably
not tested/used against SIP outbound clients implemented according to
RFC 5626
this patch fixes some issues, removing the Fingerprint check which is not
needed, and fixing the XOR scrambling of XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS. please review
it carefully and apply to your GIT tree if you are happy with it.
Signed-Off-By: Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh(a)db.org>
--
18 Feb
18 Feb
12:31 p.m.
Hi Alfred,
On 2/18/11 10:53 AM, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
Hi,
I have tested the STUN code in sip-router (enabled by make STUN=1) and it
became quite clear that this code is based on old I-D's and probably
not tested/used against SIP outbound clients implemented according to
RFC 5626
looking at the number of the rfc and its release date, I don't
remember
any update in this part of the code that would have update it
accordingly, so most probably your observations are right.
this patch fixes some issues, removing the Fingerprint check which is not
needed, and fixing the XOR scrambling of XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS. please
review
it carefully and apply to your GIT tree if you are happy with it.
You have
developer access to the git, inherited from CVS on berlios.de.
You can create your own branch (like: username/xyz) and push the patch
there, then we can allow sometime so people can test it if they want and
it there are no complains, then simply merge it to master git branch.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
22 Feb
22 Feb
12:41 p.m.
On 2/18/11 11:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
thanks, I have pushed my changes to alfredh/stun in commit
d88efbcc410e5bdc16eb0df69d93fe16adf6b9e4
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=shortlog;h=refs…
Testing is welcome :)
NOTE: does anyone know of any SIP useragent w/outbound support for UDP/STUN ?
/alfred
Hi Alfred,
On 2/18/11 10:53 AM, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
yes, the latest STUN spec is now RFC 5389
Hi,
I have tested the STUN code in sip-router (enabled by make STUN=1) and it
became quite clear that this code is based on old I-D's and probably
not tested/used against SIP outbound clients implemented according to
RFC 5626
looking at the number of the rfc and its release date, I don't
remember any update in this part of the code that would have update it accordingly, so
most probably your observations are right.
this patch fixes some issues, removing the Fingerprint check which is not
needed, and fixing the XOR scrambling of XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS. please review
it carefully and apply to your GIT tree if you are happy with it.
You have
developer access to the git, inherited from CVS on berlios.de. You can create your own
branch (like: username/xyz) and push the patch there, then we can allow sometime so people
can test it if they want and it there are no complains, then simply merge it to master git
branch.
Thanks,
Daniel
4 Mar
4 Mar
1:07 p.m.
Hello,
On 2/22/11 11:41 AM, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
On 2/18/11 11:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
thanks, I have pushed my changes to alfredh/stun in commit
d88efbcc410e5bdc16eb0df69d93fe16adf6b9e4
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=shortlog;h=refs…
Testing is welcome :)
NOTE: does anyone know of any SIP useragent w/outbound support for
UDP/STUN ?
I don't know any such SIP UA.
You can merge the branch (cherry pick the commit) into the master. It
looks safe from all perspectives, besides the fact that it does not
interact with the sip part. I don't think anyone else wants to review it
in a separate branch, merging in master is better option for testing.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
Hi Alfred,
On 2/18/11 10:53 AM, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
yes, the latest STUN spec is now RFC 5389
Hi,
I have tested the STUN code in sip-router (enabled by make STUN=1)
and it
became quite clear that this code is based on old I-D's and probably
not tested/used against SIP outbound clients implemented according to
RFC 5626
looking at the number of the rfc and its release date, I don't
remember any update in this part of the code that would have update
it accordingly, so most probably your observations are right.
this patch fixes some issues, removing the Fingerprint check which
is not
needed, and fixing the XOR scrambling of XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS. please
review
it carefully and apply to your GIT tree if you are happy with it.
You have
developer access to the git, inherited from CVS on
berlios.de. You can create your own branch (like: username/xyz) and
push the patch there, then we can allow sometime so people can test
it if they want and it there are no complains, then simply merge it
to master git branch.
5012
days inactive
5026
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alfred E. Heggestad -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla