7 Aug
2012
7 Aug
'12
8:46 a.m.
Personally, I would say that it is not in the interest of the project to scatter focus
away from itself, while further confusing newbies and in general making the
"marketing message" less coherent.
That effort would be better spent on making Kamailio more user-friendly and/or easily
deployable for trivial scenarios and small-scale, narrow purposes--if that's a
priority for the project. Whether it even should be a priority deserves some rational
discussion, since that may not be where Kamailio is strongest, just by design. The goal of
a project should be to try to succeed in the game most appropriate for its character, and
one which best aligns with the vision behind it.
-- Alex
--
Sent from my Samsung mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a
proper keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:Personally I haven't used repro, so I cannot give relevant comments on it.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 8/5/12 11:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've recently been doing some improvements to reSIProcate and it's SIP
proxy, `repro'
http://www.resiprocate.org/About_Repro
It may appear to be a competitor for Kamailio - but a closer look at it
reveals some interesting possibilities:
a) the config file is less flexible than Kamailio - but this makes it
extremely easy to set up. This makes it an ideal stepping stone for
people who are not ready for Kamailio
b) for Kamailio to really become widespread depends on a wide community
of sites running SIP proxies - repro appears to be a solution that can
be used to activate many public SIP servers very quickly, creating a
world where everyone speaks Kamailio's language
I'm curious to get some feedback about
- have other people involved with Kamailio (and related proxies) had any
exposure to reSIProcate already?
- making repro and Kamailio work well together (ideally using DNS SRV
and TLS with domain certificates/federated VoIP) - test cases? public
test servers?
- promoting the two proxies together, repro as the beginner solution,
Kamailio as a strategic option for people who need more flexibility -
does anyone feel comfortable with this concept?
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Seattle, USA, Sep 23-26, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
Kamailio Practical Workshop, Netherlands, Sep 10-12, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kpw
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
10 Aug
10 Aug
7:13 p.m.
New subject: reSIProcate/repro proxy and Kamailio
On 07/08/12 05:46, Alex Balashov wrote:
Personally, I would say that it is not in the interest
of the project to scatter focus away from itself, while further confusing newbies and in
general making the "marketing message" less coherent.
This is not a universal truth
Promoting a conflicting technology (e.g. Viber or Skype) would not help
Kamailio very much
However, competitors can work together constructively. The closest
person to Mr Bolt in the 100m and 200m this week was his training
partner, Yohan Blake. Is there anyone on this mailing list who would
NOT like to whitewash the world with open source, open standards based
SIP proxies in the way Jamaica whitewashed the gold, silver and bronze
for 200m last night?
That effort would be better spent on making Kamailio
more user-friendly and/or easily deployable for trivial scenarios and small-scale, narrow
purposes--if that's a priority for the project. Whether it even should be a priority
deserves some rational discussion, since that may not be where Kamailio is strongest, just
by design. The goal of a project should be to try to succeed in the game most appropriate
for its character, and one which best aligns with the vision behind it.
Not necessarily, should Kamailio developers really spend time on things
like:
- making an MSI package for Windows users?
- making a built-in admin web server?
In fact, with built in web server and Berkeley DB support, repro is
fully self-contained and could even run on a router.
These are just some of the unique features of repro that are maybe very
low on the priority list for Kamailio, but they are important for a
world of federated SIP servers
I've put up a guide here with some config samples and screenshots, I'd
actually like to adapt this to have a Kamailio equivalent of the same guide
http://www.opentelecoms.org/federated-voip-quick-start-howto
and any feedback would be really welcome
12 Aug
12 Aug
4:50 p.m.
New subject: reSIProcate/repro proxy and Kamailio
Hi,
On 08/10/2012 06:13 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Not necessarily, should Kamailio developers really
spend time on things
like:
- making an MSI package for Windows users?
- making a built-in admin web server?
In fact, with built in web server and Berkeley DB support, repro is
fully self-contained and could even run on a router.
These are just some of the unique features of repro that are maybe very
low on the priority list for Kamailio, but they are important for a
world of federated SIP servers
These things already exist for a long time on top of Kamailio, e.g.
http://www.sipwise.com/products/spce/
It's of no real interest for the Kamailio project itself, because
Kamailio focuses on providing a highly flexible and performant SIP
routing engine. The "real" applications are provided at a higher level.
Pretty much the same as with Apache or Nginx providing the web server,
which don't do anything useful by themselves, but shine when people
write their own applications on top of it, served by these components.
I've put up a guide here with some config samples
and screenshots, I'd
actually like to adapt this to have a Kamailio equivalent of the same guide
http://www.opentelecoms.org/federated-voip-quick-start-howto
and any feedback would be really welcome
That's nice and important for the SIP landscape and everything, but how
is this of relevance for the Kamailio project? There are quite a couple
of open source SIP proxies or soft switches out there, and if they speak
proper SIP and adhere to the SIP related standards, they should be able
to play together nicely. So I don't get the idea of "advertising" repro
and kamailio together, as they are different and unrelated projects, and
the users can choose whatever suits them better.
Andreas
13 Aug
13 Aug
10:11 a.m.
New subject: reSIProcate/repro proxy and Kamailio
10 aug 2012 kl. 18:13 skrev Daniel Pocock:
On 07/08/12 05:46, Alex Balashov wrote:
We're not saying that we can not work together. But there's limited time to spend
on the project and so far no one here has seen
any benefit in spending that time on joint marketing of our projects. Exchanging ideas,
recommending each other's products
in different situations is something we've been doing for a long time and won't
stop doing now.
We look forward to continue the discussion with you and possible cooperation in how to
support various issues. Please keep
us informed about the progress of the Resiprocate/Repro projects!
/O
PS. Kamailio also has a built-in web server. We have a configuration web in Siremis. As we
don't support Windows,
there's no need for a MSI package.
Personally, I would say that it is not in the
interest of the project to scatter focus away from itself, while further confusing newbies
and in general making the "marketing message" less coherent.
This is not a universal truth
Promoting a conflicting technology (e.g. Viber or Skype) would not help
Kamailio very much
However, competitors can work together constructively.
4488
days inactive
4494
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alex Balashov -
Andreas Granig -
Daniel Pocock -
Olle E. Johansson