19 Jan
2017
19 Jan
'17
10:35 p.m.
while testing latest master, my sip proxy didn't start and produced
these errors to syslog:
Jan 19 21:32:18 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[5382]: BUG: <core> [core/select.c:376]:
resolve_select(): final node has SEL_PARAM_EXPECTED set (no more parameters available)
Jan 19 21:32:18 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[5382]: ERROR: <core> [core/rvalue.c:2879]:
fix_rval(): Unable to resolve select
it is very difficult to find what went wrong because no config line
number is associated with the errors.
-- juha
20 Jan
20 Jan
11:11 a.m.
I just pushed a patch that should print cfg line and column in such
case. Can you test and see if works ok?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19/01/2017 20:35, Juha Heinanen wrote:
while testing latest master, my sip proxy didn't
start and produced
these errors to syslog:
Jan 19 21:32:18 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[5382]: BUG: <core> [core/select.c:376]:
resolve_select(): final node has SEL_PARAM_EXPECTED set (no more parameters available)
Jan 19 21:32:18 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[5382]: ERROR: <core> [core/rvalue.c:2879]:
fix_rval(): Unable to resolve select
it is very difficult to find what went wrong because no config line
number is associated with the errors.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
21 Jan
21 Jan
3:49 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I just pushed a patch that should print cfg line and
column in such
case. Can you test and see if works ok?
The commit didn't change the syslog output. The commit checks if
fix_rval returns negative result:
case RVE_RVAL_OP:
ret = fix_rval(&rve->left.rval);
if (ret<0) goto error;
return ret;
but looks like it always returns 0:
static int fix_rval(struct rvalue* rv)
{
...
case RV_SEL:
if (resolve_select(&rv->v.sel)<0){
ERR("Unable to resolve select\n");
print_select(&rv->v.sel);
}
return 0;
-- Juha
23 Jan
23 Jan
10:50 a.m.
On 21/01/2017 01:49, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I pushed another commit for it.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar 20-22 (USA) - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
I just pushed a patch that should print cfg line
and column in such
case. Can you test and see if works ok?
The commit didn't change the syslog
output. The commit checks if
fix_rval returns negative result:
case RVE_RVAL_OP:
ret = fix_rval(&rve->left.rval);
if (ret<0) goto error;
return ret;
but looks like it always returns 0:
static int fix_rval(struct rvalue* rv)
{
...
case RV_SEL:
if (resolve_select(&rv->v.sel)<0){
ERR("Unable to resolve select\n");
print_select(&rv->v.sel);
}
return 0;
24 Jan
24 Jan
7:49 a.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I pushed another commit for it.
Thanks, now I got the line number:
Jan 24 06:45:39 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[8809]: BUG: <core> [core/select.c:376]:
resolve_select(): final node has SEL_PARAM_EXPECTED set (no more parameters available)
Jan 24 06:45:39 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[8809]: ERROR: <core> [core/rvalue.c:2883]:
fix_rval(): Unable to resolve select in cfg at line: 4090 col: 23
-- Juha
2860
days inactive
2865
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Juha Heinanen