i tried to start sr on amd64 architecture and got this:
0(8945) : <core> [cfg.lex:1427]: ERROR:lex:addstr: memory allocation error 0(8945) : <core> [cfg.lex:1429]: ERROR:lex:addstr: try to increase pkg size with -M parameter
i have -M 4, which works ok on i386 architecture.
why do i get the errors?
-- juha
Juha Heinanen writes
i tried to start sr on amd64 architecture and got this:
0(8945) : <core> [cfg.lex:1427]: ERROR:lex:addstr: memory allocation error 0(8945) : <core> [cfg.lex:1429]: ERROR:lex:addstr: try to increase pkg size with -M parameter
i have -M 4, which works ok on i386 architecture.
why do i get the errors?
when i increased -M value to 8, sr started ok. does this mean that on 64 bit architecture, sr is consuming so much more memory bytes that 4 MB is not enough pkg memory even when there is no users configured on the system?
-- juha
On 10/17/11 7:33 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes
i tried to start sr on amd64 architecture and got this:
0(8945) :<core> [cfg.lex:1427]: ERROR:lex:addstr: memory allocation error 0(8945) :<core> [cfg.lex:1429]: ERROR:lex:addstr: try to increase pkg size with -M parameter
i have -M 4, which works ok on i386 architecture.
why do i get the errors?
when i increased -M value to 8, sr started ok. does this mean that on 64 bit architecture, sr is consuming so much more memory bytes that 4 MB is not enough pkg memory even when there is no users configured on the system?
the users will go anyhow in shared memory (I assumed you referred to location records, as subscriber table is not cached anyhow). If you have a big config file, it may be the case of running out of private memory.
On 64b the structures are bigger in size, most of them having pointers or long fields, which are now 64b size instead of 32.
Cheers, Daniel
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
the users will go anyhow in shared memory (I assumed you referred to location records, as subscriber table is not cached anyhow). If you have a big config file, it may be the case of running out of private memory.
On 64b the structures are bigger in size, most of them having pointers or long fields, which are now 64b size instead of 32.
ok, thanks for the explanation. my config is big.
-- juha
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Juha Heinanen