Re: [OpenSER-Users-ES] ¿Es válido cambiar el From NAME en vez del From username?

El Tuesday 01 April 2008 10:05:10 Jesus Rodriguez escribió: Sí, pero sólo un nodo trusted puede enviar un PAI: RFC 3325: ----------------------------------------------------- 5. Proxy Behavior [...] If the proxy receives a message (request or response) from a node that it trusts, it can use the information in the P-Asserted-Identity header field, if any, as if it had authenticated the user itself. [...] If the proxy received the message from an element that it does not trust and there is a P-Asserted-Identity header present which contains a SIP or SIPS URI, the proxy MUST replace that SIP or SIPS URI with a single SIP or SIPS URI or remove this header field. ----------------------------------------------------- Pero según el RFC se debería usar PPI y no PAI (me refiero cuando el cliente quiere setear el callerid): ----------------------------------------------------- 9.1 The P-Asserted-Identity Header The P-Asserted-Identity header field is used among trusted SIP entities (typically intermediaries) to carry the identity of the user sending a SIP message as it was verified by authentication. ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- 9.2 The P-Preferred-Identity Header The P-Preferred-Identity header field is used from a user agent to a trusted proxy to carry the identity the user sending the SIP message wishes to be used for the P-Asserted-Header field value that the trusted element will insert. ----------------------------------------------------- NOTA: Según el RFC 3324 un proxy puede ser considerado trusted para un cliente pero no la inversa. En el caso que nos ocupa el proxy es trusted para el cliente, pero el cliente no es trusted para el proxy luego estamos en el caso 9.2. ¿Me equivoco? Gracias. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es