sr-users April 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

69 participants
115 discussions

Re: [Serusers] fed up and need guidance
by jaime.gill＠orange.co.uk 22 Apr '03

22 Apr '03

Hi Mat, Just saw your question posted in the mailing list. If I understand your scenario is like this: UA1 --- SER ---- NAT/FW --- Internet ---- NAT/FW ----- SER ---- UA2 If so, I have been working to get something like this working for a couple of months. I wrote a module that is supposed to act as a nathelper and as a FCP client. If you are still having problems to get this working, get back to me and I can provide you with guidance. Regards, Jaime Mat Harris <mat.harris(a)genestate.com> on 16/04/2003 14:40:35 To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org cc: (bcc: Jaime GILL/EN/HTLUK) Subject: [Serusers] fed up and need guidance hi, i have been playing around with ser now for around a month and am getting nowhere. i have two sites running ser on redhat (7.3 and 8). the ser machines are each behind a redhat (7.3) firewall with port 5060(udp) forwarded to the ser machines. i cannot see presence of any users at the other site and vice versa. please can someone guide me through how they would set up such an operation. this really is a hand-holding job i'm afraid. very grateful for a quick response. cheers -- Mat Harris OpenGPG Public Key ID: C37D57D9 mat.harris(a)genestate.com www.genestate.com ******************************************************************************* Important. Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately. Monitoring/Viruses Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No 2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park, Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ. *******************************************************************************

1 0

[Serusers] Illegal instruction
by Matthew McGillis 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

System Configuration: RedHat 8.0 Linux box Linux red.jenika.com 2.4.18-27.8.0 #1 Fri Mar 14 05:45:24 EST 2003 i586 i586 i386 GNU/Linux make-3.79.1-14 tar-1.13.25-8 bison-1.35-4 gcc-3.2-7 libgcc-3.2-7 flex-2.5.4a-26 Downloaded ser-0.8.10 source. make builds everything and install installed. However this is what I always get after executing it: $ /usr/local/sbin/ser Illegal instruction This is with debug: $ /usr/local/sbin/ser -dddd -E 0(25834) WARNING: hash function optimized for 1024 entries 0(25834) WARNING: use of 65536 entries may lead to unflat distribution 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: QM_OPTIMIZE=2048, /ROUNDTO=512 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: QM_HASH_SIZE=534, qm_block size=25656 0(25834) qm_malloc_init(0x80a5700, 1048576), start=0x80a5700 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: size= 1048576, init_overhead=25704 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: QM_OPTIMIZE=2048, /ROUNDTO=512 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: QM_HASH_SIZE=534, qm_block size=25656 0(25834) qm_malloc_init(0x4015d000, 33554432), start=0x4015d000 0(25834) qm_malloc_init: size= 33554432, init_overhead=25704 0(25834) qm_malloc(0x4015d000, 4) called from mem/shm_mem.c: shm_mem_init(275) 0(25834) qm_malloc(0x4015d000, 4) returns address 0x40163450 on 0 -th hit 0(25834) shm_mem_init: success 0(25834) qm_malloc(0x4015d000, 4) called from timer.c: init_timer(52) 0(25834) qm_malloc(0x4015d000, 4) returns address 0x40163484 on 0 -th hit 0(25834) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (print) registered 0(25834) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (uptime) registered 0(25834) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (version) registered 0(25834) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (which) registered 0(25834) DEBUG: register_fifo_cmd: new command (ps) registered Illegal instruction This is with strace: $ strace /usr/local/sbin/ser execve("/usr/local/sbin/ser", ["/usr/local/sbin/ser"], [/* 24 vars */]) = 0 uname({sys="Linux", node="red.jenika.com", ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x81a5760 open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=44712, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 44712, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40013000 close(3) = 0 open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\270\25"..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=12165, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 12116, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001e000 old_mmap(0x40020000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x1000) = 0x40020000 close(3) = 0 open("/lib/libresolv.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\230\'\0"..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=69443, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40021000 old_mmap(NULL, 69444, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40022000 old_mmap(0x40030000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xe000) = 0x40030000 old_mmap(0x40031000, 8004, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40031000 close(3) = 0 open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\210U\1"..., 512) = 512 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1377691, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 1219172, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40033000 old_mmap(0x40155000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x121000) = 0x40155000 old_mmap(0x4015b000, 6756, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4015b000 close(3) = 0 munmap(0x40013000, 44712) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x80587b0, [INT], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {0x80587b0, [PIPE], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR1, {0x80587b0, [USR1], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {0x80587b0, [CHLD], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGTERM, {0x80587b0, [TERM], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {0x80587b0, [HUP], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR2, {0x80587b0, [USR2], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x40059cf8}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 brk(0) = 0x81a5760 brk(0x81a6760) = 0x81a6760 brk(0) = 0x81a6760 brk(0x81a7000) = 0x81a7000 open("/usr/local/etc/ser/ser.cfg", O_RDONLY) = 3 open("/dev/zero", O_RDWR) = 4 old_mmap(NULL, 33554432, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 4, 0) = 0x4015d000 close(4) = 0 brk(0) = 0x81a7000 brk(0x81aa000) = 0x81aa000 ioctl(3, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE, 0xbfffd2e0) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device) --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) --- +++ killed by SIGILL +++ This is the stack trace from gdb: $ gdb /usr/local/sbin/ser GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2.1-4) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/sbin/ser Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x0807204b in yy_get_next_buffer () (gdb) bt #0 0x0807204b in yy_get_next_buffer () #1 0x08071cf8 in yylex () #2 0x080750ce in yyparse () #3 0x0805634e in main () #4 0x400484ed in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 Any ideas or thoughts would be appreciated please respond to my e-mail address I'm not a member of this mail list. Thanks! Matthew McGillis

2 1

[Serusers] SIMPLE Features of ser
by Steve Lewis 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Has anyone tried out the SIMPLE features of ser? Based on what I have read it appears to support contacts and presence. If so, which clients has it been tested with? Regards, Steve

2 3

RE: [Serusers] pstn connectivity
by LeeCC, Kenny 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

instead of t_relay_to("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx","5060"); try rewritehostport("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060"); > -----Original Message----- > From: budi wibowo [mailto:bu1d@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 09:54 > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] pstn connectivity > > > hi i'm new guy in this list > and i have a litle problem with connectivity to psnt > thru cisco as5300 > below is my ser.cfg, yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is ip of ser and > xx.xxx.xxx.xxx is ip of the cisco gw > > if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy"){ > log("Forward to pstn \n"); > t_relay_to("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx","5060"); > break; > }; > > > > and i have this on my cisco > ! > dial-peer voice 4 voip > incoming called number . > destination-pattern 2525T > session protocol sipv2 > session target sip-server > codec g723r63 > ! > ! > sip-ua > calling-info sip-to-pstn number set 113950029 > sip-server ipv4:yyy.yyy.yy.yyyy > ! > > my pproblem is.. i cant if i dial to 252544123 from my > softphone , it's not work > but when i dial with format 252544123(a)xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > it always work > anyone have clue for my problem? > thx > > budi > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

5 7

[Serusers] build static modules , undefined reference to 'usrloc_exports' ?
by jimmy_huang 20 Apr '03

20 Apr '03

hello... I want to build a small and workable ser (let user can sending messages , registering , talking via ser...) , and build needed modules to static modules , what modules should I build in with static modules? I tried built tm,sl,rr,maxfwd,usrloc these modules to static modules , but it has some error...in compiling sr_module.o only when build usrloc modules to static modules, does "usrloc" modules can't build to static modules? or i have missing something?? error msg as follow... sr_module.o (.text+0x5a9):In function 'register_builtin_modules': :undefined reference to 'usrloc_exports' My environment is in RedHat 9.0 Jimmy

2 1

RE: [Serusers] pstn connectivity
by Dan Austin 20 Apr '03

20 Apr '03

OK. It sounds like the Softphone is not putting the realm/domain in the URI. Which softphone are you using? -----Original Message----- From: budi wibowo [mailto:bu1d@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2003 7:29 AM To: Dan Austin Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] pstn connectivity yes i have resistered my softphone, if i connect using the wrong username or the wrong password i got message like not authorized how do i check if my softphoen is registered or not if i dial to 1136523456(a)111.111.111.111 everything is normal tia budi --- Dan Austin <Dan_Austin(a)Phoenix.com> wrote: > Is the softphone configured to register with your > SER install? > > I've verified the setting in the how-to with MSN > messenger 4.6 > and a Cisco 7940 converted to use SIP. > > If you have to add the ip address of the gw to the > request, it > would seem like your phone might not be registered. > What happens > if you send the call to 1136523456(a)111.111.111.111? > > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: budi wibowo [mailto:bu1d@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 7:53 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn connectivity > > > - the request sent by the softphone > - to check the request on server ..how i do that > - i do debug ccsip all on my gateway and i saw > something uncomplete for the request , like the > translation rule not work properly > but i include the ip of cisco gw eerything is normal > any clue? or any suggestion which softphone i should > use? > > > boedz > > > > > --- Nils Ohlmeier <nils(a)iptel.org> wrote: > > Sounds like you softphone do not know where to > send > > a request if you omit the > > host part. Is the request sent by the softphone if > > you omit the host part? Is > > the request received at the server? Do the server > > deliver the request if it > > received it? and so on and on and on... > > > > Greetings > > Nils > > > > On Saturday 19 April 2003 04:31, budi wibowo > wrote: > > > dear all i repeat my problem > > > - pc running ser with ip 111.111.111.111 > > > - cisco 5350 with dial-peer to sip-server with > ip > > > 222.222.222.222 > > > - remote pc running sip softphone > > > > > > > > > i have read austin how to.. regarding how to > > connect > > > to cisco gw > > > but it's not work > > > example ..i want to dial to singapore with > pattern > > 113 > > > if i dial from my softphone 1136523456 it always > > > failed, but if dial using > > 1136523456(a)222.222.222.222 > > > it always work . > > > is there anything missing on my config? > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > budi > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com

3 2

RE: [Serusers] pstn connectivity
by budi wibowo 19 Apr '03

19 Apr '03

yes i have resistered my softphone, if i connect using the wrong username or the wrong password i got message like not authorized how do i check if my softphoen is registered or not if i dial to 1136523456(a)111.111.111.111 everything is normal tia budi --- Dan Austin <Dan_Austin(a)Phoenix.com> wrote: > Is the softphone configured to register with your > SER install? > > I've verified the setting in the how-to with MSN > messenger 4.6 > and a Cisco 7940 converted to use SIP. > > If you have to add the ip address of the gw to the > request, it > would seem like your phone might not be registered. > What happens > if you send the call to 1136523456(a)111.111.111.111? > > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: budi wibowo [mailto:bu1d@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 7:53 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] pstn connectivity > > > - the request sent by the softphone > - to check the request on server ..how i do that > - i do debug ccsip all on my gateway and i saw > something uncomplete for the request , like the > translation rule not work properly > but i include the ip of cisco gw eerything is normal > any clue? or any suggestion which softphone i should > use? > > > boedz > > > > > --- Nils Ohlmeier <nils(a)iptel.org> wrote: > > Sounds like you softphone do not know where to > send > > a request if you omit the > > host part. Is the request sent by the softphone if > > you omit the host part? Is > > the request received at the server? Do the server > > deliver the request if it > > received it? and so on and on and on... > > > > Greetings > > Nils > > > > On Saturday 19 April 2003 04:31, budi wibowo > wrote: > > > dear all i repeat my problem > > > - pc running ser with ip 111.111.111.111 > > > - cisco 5350 with dial-peer to sip-server with > ip > > > 222.222.222.222 > > > - remote pc running sip softphone > > > > > > > > > i have read austin how to.. regarding how to > > connect > > > to cisco gw > > > but it's not work > > > example ..i want to dial to singapore with > pattern > > 113 > > > if i dial from my softphone 1136523456 it always > > > failed, but if dial using > > 1136523456(a)222.222.222.222 > > > it always work . > > > is there anything missing on my config? > > > > > > > > > rgds > > > > > > budi > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com

1 0

[Serusers] Having difficulty running Serweb
by trung 19 Apr '03

19 Apr '03

Hi there, I have been reading Austin-how-to on the serweb and the forum, I manage to get the website up and running. But when I log into it as admin. The screen doesn't look like its getting me anywhere. It stay the same and ask to enter username and password again. If anyone have this serweb running successful on Redhat 8 or give me hint to get this running, it will be an honor. Thanks in Advance, Trung

2 1

[Serusers] error in rr.so
by Dopf Walter 18 Apr '03

18 Apr '03

hi all, in the new ver. 0.8.11 i changed additional to the news: rewriteFromRoute has been replaced with strict_route() and: 0(26945) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so but: 0(26945) find_export: <strict_route> not found 0(26945) find_export: <strict_route> not found 0(26945) parse error (75,15-16): unknown command, missing loadmodule? what's missing ? best wdo

4 6

[Serusers] failure in auth.so in ver 0.8.11
by Dopf Walter 18 Apr '03

18 Apr '03

hi all, i don't know what's going wrong here. i made an uprade to ver 0.8.11, since that time i get allways the same failure: 0(26268) set_mod_param_regex: auth matches module auth 0(26268) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <calculate_ha1> not found in module <auth> and 0(26268) set_mod_param_regex: auth matches module auth 0(26268) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <password_column> not found in module <auth> all commands former been handled by he module auth.so cause an error any ideas best wdo

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
12
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2003