sr-users April 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

69 participants
115 discussions

[Serusers] About Aliases
by Santosh M Hulkund 09 Apr '03

09 Apr '03

Hi, How do I make the aliases field editable in serweb. The user should have the option of editing his aliases. Any help in this regard, greatly appreciated. Regards, Santosh M Hulkund

2 1

[Serusers] FCP module getting ready for testing...
by jaime＠umtstrial.co.uk 09 Apr '03

09 Apr '03

Hello, The FCP module for SER seems to be approaching to a stable version (no guarranties, though). The module is in charge of 2 functions: - Translation of SIP messages from a private network to a public one (using NAT). - Open and close pinholes in a firewall to allow media sessions through. The module implements the FCP side that communicates with a deamon called fcpd that runs on the firewall itself (developed by iptel: http://www.iptel.org/fcp/). It seems to be reasonably stable now … [View More]

1 0

[Serusers] Suppress Warning messages
by Santosh M Hulkund 08 Apr '03

08 Apr '03

Hi all, How do I suppress warning messages in serweb ? Regards, Santosh M Hulkund

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SIP and ATA-186 forwarding
by Jiri Kuthan 07 Apr '03

07 Apr '03

At 09:34 PM 4/6/2003, Mike wrote: >I apologize for the terminology, I'm still learning. Don't worry -- actually there was some confusion in what I wrote you too. ATA may do BYE/Also, but the standard way of call-transfer is using REFER request. >Maybe not an "issue" with SER, but I guess what I need is a way for SER to >get this BYE message, see the Also: and initiate another INVITE to the >correct station, handling it like a new call? No. What you need is standardized call … [View More]

1 0

[Serusers] nethelper module
by Michael Vasilenko 07 Apr '03

07 Apr '03

Hello Does nethelper module exist as a patch, or it's now intergrated into ther core of SER, can anyone clarify this? I've just mentioned 'nethelper' module in documentation, but no source code in tree. -- Michael Vasilenko

2 1

[Serusers] serweb and fifo
by Meghan Patricia Byrne 07 Apr '03

07 Apr '03

I've successfully installed serweb and am able to log in. However, once I do so, I get the following error: Warning: fopen(/tmp/ser_fifo) [function.fopen]: failed to create stream: Permission denied in /usr/local/apache/htdocs/serweb/functions.php on line 172 at the top of the screen, and the message "sorry -- cannot open fifo" in red letters on the webpage above the user's information. I'm wondering if ser or apache needs to be configured somewhere with the correct permissions or ownership … [View More]

2 4

Re: [Serusers] SIP and ATA-186 forwarding
by Jiri Kuthan 06 Apr '03

06 Apr '03

At 01:19 AM 4/4/2003, Mike wrote: >I'm trying to get SER to work properly with the call forwarding feature of >an ATA-186. The ATA-186 forwards calls (#90number#) by doing a BYE with >an "also" header. SER doesn't seem to do anything with this at all, and >the call just sits in limbo until everybody hangs up. > >Call forwarding on busy/no-answer works, but I think that's because the >ATA is doing a refer instead. > >Any clue where I should be looking for this? Is … [View More]

2 1

[Serusers] Regarding NOTIFY
by Geetha Shree 06 Apr '03

06 Apr '03

hi all, We wanted to know whether the SER server will just Proxy the Notify method or else it gives the 200OK response also. When we sent the Notify method, it just proxied to the contact ip address but did not send the 200OK response to us. Thanks Geetha

2 1

[Serusers] bug in last changes for "rport-received" tags
by Sergio Miguel Garcia 06 Apr '03

06 Apr '03

I have been testing the last changes about the "rport-received" tags, and I have found the next bug: when using UDP transport, if the IP address and port in the "Via" field differ from the IP address and port of the incoming packet, the "received" and "port" tags added to the Via of the response are correct, but the packet is sent back to the "received" IP address BUT to an incorrect port ( this should be the "rport" port ), that generates an ICMP "Destination unrecheable port". I have been … [View More]

2 1

[Serusers] workaround for bug in snom's RR-ing
by Jiri Kuthan 04 Apr '03

04 Apr '03

fyi (in response to a frequently asked question "how to get snom's buggy RR-ing working along with PRACK). I just tried to create a workaournd to the problem (which is PRACK does not put Routes learned in 183). It's as easy as mangling SIP messages not to advertise their support for "100rel": if (method=="INVITE" && search("User-Agent: snom")) { #replace("PRACK, ", ""); replace("100rel, ", ""); }; -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2003