This issue is one of the fixes present in the next release.
Thank your for reporting it.
Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi, i have running mediaproxy 1.0 with Python 2.3 (compiled from
source) in a Linux RedHat 8.0 kernel 2.4.18-14.
After a few weeks running i see high memory utilization from
mediaproxy.py process. I am loggin Vm usage to see if exist a leak.
* Captured from /proc/PID/Status every 15 minutes.
* The increment is done after each call processed.
* I try to keep the process running several days to see if python free
mem but never occur, always increment.
...
VmSize: 7964 kB
VmSize: 8780 kB
VmSize: 8780 kB
Hi,
I am very new to SER.
can someone provide me a configuration example for the following setup:
- have three SIP accounts (1 * fwd, 2* sipgate.de)
- one hardware IP-Phone, which can only be configured for one SIP account
so I want to setup a server which acts like an SIP-Server to the fxs
adapter, and connects itself to the SIP services so that incoming call
on one of the three SIP accounts get forwared to the IP-Phone. For
outgoing calls the account should be selectable by a dial-prefix with a
default.
Thank you very much.
Regards
Sebastian
Hi everyone
I used the code in
"http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/ser_modules/snmp/".But some
file is not exist,such as "../../Makefile.defs" and
"../../Makefile.modules".Where is those files and what should I do to
compile them to get a snmp.so.
Could someone help me?Or send me the file snmp.so?
thanks.
_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
My company has recently deployed a Metaswitch VP3500 softswitch for PSTN
services. This switch supports SIP clients but I would rather have SIP
clients register to a proxy than directly to the switch. Would SER be the
product for this? Does anyone have experience with this? Are there any
folks offering consulting/setup services for SER for this type
application?
--
Chad Whitten
Vinayak,
I'm working throught setting up SER and came across the problem with MySQL 4.1.7 too
and sorted it out through changing old passwords this way:
I did it for users ser and serro.
mysql> UPDATE mysql.user SET Password = OLD_PASSWORD('newpwd')
-> WHERE Host = 'some_host' AND User = 'some_user';
mysql> FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
hope this will help
Lada
PS: it works even without starting mysqld and parameter --old_passwords
Hi,
We have some SIP UAs behind NAT. It is capable of sending NOTIFY messages to
keep NAT binding fresh. I am thinking about two setups and would like to
know which one has less hit on ser's performance.
. Register with ser every 150 seconds, assume that most NAT udp binding is
180 seconds.
. Send Notify every 50 seconds, the NOTIFY includes the authentication nonce
from REGISTER message. So ser can verify that the message is real and send a
200 OK back.
Your option is appreciated.
Thanks,
Richard
Hello All.
I have a SER with a Vocal B2bUA this one works great with FEE
accounting and authorisation
I have a freeradius server and my billing system does support digest
authentication.
But I simply can not make the b2bua works with my radius server.
Note: I get a 0 in the 32bits authentication
Now: the billing system will be in the SER or in the B2bua or both?
Regards
Humberto
Hi all,
I have a very urgent question and I would know if anyone is dealing with
CAC on SER....exist any methods/function in statefull proxy mode to count
simultaneous calls coming from the same calling party number (from HF),
feeded from one IP PBX (like Asterisk) with just one single digest account
and one permitted uri, in case setting two call thresholds (one for the
allowed simoltaneous calls and one for the allowed call per second)? If
yes, is it possible blacklisting/barring this user (in a cached table with
function like file permission.deny) for some time/forever if the call counters
exceed limit settled by threshold?
10nx,
Verbal
Thanks,
I looked at the RADIUS module - it doesn't have documentation yet :-)
Any way from the RADIUS package I've downloaded it seems much more complex
than what I need - I already have the my authentication server I only have
to give it 3-5 parameters and only for REGISTER requests. I'm not sure that
RADIUS will enable me callbacks for my authentication methods and I'm pretty
sure that it re-parses SIP messages (because it's not build only for SER).
Where can I find more RADIUS documentation?
Is there any other simpler solution?
>From: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
>To: Michael Kaufmann <mkaufmannn(a)hotmail.com>
>CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] stateless/statefull processing and INVITE method
>retransmissions
>Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:31:45 +0100
>
>Your description seems to be similar to what radius is doing, perhaps
>you could use radius authentication ?
>
> Jan.
>
>On 14-11 10:13, Michael Kaufmann wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I see that the registrar part of SER is using SL module.
> > I am trying to build my own authentication - simply use the
>PRE_SCRIPT_CB
> > callback (without using the configuration file) to send some of the data
>in
> > SIP requests to my own server without reparsing the message.
> > The problem occures when the user is not authorized - when the callback
> > return value is 0 no answer is sent back to the client, and I would like
>to
> > send him the not authorized reply.
> >
> > How can it be done if the only way to hook request answers is using TM?
> >
> > Another problem - I really didn't understand from the documentation if
>the
> > authentication module is able to do what I described above (my server
>might
> > be in another computer and has to be able to handle more than one SER -
>It
> > might even exchange data with the SIP clients)
> >
> > Can someone give me an idea of how to implement the SER side module for
> > such a server?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Micky
> >
> >
> > >From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > >To: Michael Kaufmann <mkaufmannn(a)hotmail.com>
> > >CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] stateless/statefull processing and INVITE
>method
> > >retransmissions
> > >Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:17:06 +0100
> > >
> > >On Nov 11, 2004 at 16:59, Michael Kaufmann <mkaufmannn(a)hotmail.com>
>wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Ser is pretty new to me (about 3 weeks of reading about it and
>working
> > >with
> > >> it), so naturally I have some questions: (attached - the
>configuration
> > >> file I use)
> > >>
> > >> I saw many examples of configuration files were both SL and TM
>modules
> > >are
> > >> loaded.
> > >> In such cases is SL loaded only for REGISTER requests?
> > >
> > >sl is loaded for stateless replies. If you want to send only an error
> > >reply and you haven't called any tm functions (t_newtran, t_rely) and
> > >you are not in a failure route, it's faster to use sl_send_reply (it
> > >doesn't make sense to keep state in this case).
> > >
> > >> How can I control which of SER actions are handled with TM and which
>are
> > >> handled with SL?
> > >
> > >sl handles only stateless replies. If you want to send a request
> > >statelessly use forward(uri:host, uri:port).
> > >If you use t_relay instead of forward than you use tm.
> > >
> > >> Is there a way of hooking SER answers to requests without TM?
> > >No.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> As I understand from this mail archive - INVITE is a special case in
>SER
> > >> and even though the client doesn't retramit such requests, SER does.
>Is
> > >> there a way to avoid this retransmission? Is there a way to control
>the
> > >> interval time between one retransmission to another?
> > >
> > >In statefull mode (TM), ser retransmits the request on behalf of the
> > >client. THe retransmission stops when a reply is received or after some
> > >timeout. The time between retransmissions is not constant, it
>increases.
> > >See the sip rfc for more details (rfc3261).
> > >>
> > >> It seems that sometimes these retransmissions occure even after the
>ACK
> > >is
> > >> returned...
> > >
> > >The INVITE retransmissions stops when a reply to it comes.
> > >ACKs "control" the replies retransmissions. ACKs to INVITE positive
> > >replies are handled a little differently than ACKs to negative replies.
> > >You might have a non-matching ACK, or the ACK might not reach the
> > >desired target.
> > >
> > >> Another starnge this is that my clients are on the same domain as the
> > >one
> > >> SER is on and still record_route() seems to add many non usefull
>header
> > >> lines for such INVITE messages.
> > >
> > >If you don't need record routing then don't use it.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Is it a problem with my configuration file?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >Andrei
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.com/
Hi there
thanks for answering
Jan Janak wrote:
>>would sound reasonable to get (i.e. from RADIUS) a
>>call duration limit (i.e. time_t time + duration),
>>save it together with the nathelper call setup (possibly
>>while nathelper first asks rtpproxy for the call ports),
>>and modify rtpproxy to check if the time limit was
>>reached, ending/blocking the call in this case and
>>avoiding the need of a B2BUA for this particular
>>situation?
>
> No, I do not think that this is a good idea.
> Jan.
I've heard and read that using a B2BUA is the only
way to impose a call duration limit with SER.
unfortunately it doesn't scale well (asterisk
is processor power hungry and NAT unfriendly,
being compared to SER)
is there any other idea being worked on or even
on hold on imposing such a limit using SER alone
(patched, of course)?
as the nathelper/mediaproxy calls have to pass
fully onto the SER box, it sounded reasonable
to me to do this control there. I'd appreciate
some comments (pros/cons) on this topic :-)
thank you for the great work made on SER.
Cheers
!3runo
