1.) Has anyone had any luck using xlite to connect to their SER server? When
I start up xlite, it doesn't register with my SER server. I can connect to
my SER using windows manager, but am having trouble configuring xlite to
connect to it. I've tried looking up on the support page at xten's site, but
couldn't find anything there.
2.) As far as windows messenger is concerned, the user agent is able to
register at my SER server, but I cannot establish a voice session with other
windows messenger user agents registered at the server. Anyone have any idea
what the issue could be here?
Thanks in advance.
Sher
folks, i am running ser version: ser 0.8.12 (i386/freebsd) and am
trying to do some trouble shooting. thought i wuld try running
the process in the foreground. according to the man page this is
done w/the -D command flag. however when i try this ser still
detaches and becomes a daemon... am i missing something?
tia,
daryl
Hello List.
I have a question for the list. I want to know if is possible to
serve two domains in a single SER machine. The idea is have two domains and
have for each domain different authentication methods, different exec( )
command calls, and even maybe different billing model. Is possible to
implement this?, if so, the best method to separete the "profiles" is by a
if (uri=="mydomain1.com") else if (uri="mydomain2.com") or somethign like
that?. For example is possible in a sigle machine have something like this.
*********************************************************
* SER SIP PROXY SERVER *
* IP : 192.168.1.10 *
*********************************************************
Profile 1. Profile 2
Users Registered with Users Registered with
Domain Domain
sip1.mydomain.comsip2.mydomain.com
Prefix = 555 Prefix = 444
This domain have This domain have
authentication 1 authentication 2
authorization 1 authorization 2
billing 1 billing 2
exec 1 exec 2
Any help is welcome.
Best Regards.
Ricardo Martinez
I'm trying to register using windows messenger. I ran "serctl monitor" on
the server and I can see that in the statistics section the "200:" response
count is incremented every time I try to sign in through windows messenger.
I'm thinking this means that SER is getting the request and is responding w/
a success; however, windows messenger doesn't sign in and eventually times
out. I'm using mostly the default settings in ser.cfg and have not set a
username and password.
Anyone have an idea what I'm missing here?
Thanks.
Sher
Hi all,
I have a very urgent question and I would know if anyone is dealing with
CAC on SER....exist any methods/function in statefull proxy mode to count
simultaneous calls coming from the same calling party number (from HF),
feeded from one IP PBX (like Asterisk) with just one single digest account
and one permitted uri, in case setting two call thresholds (one for the
allowed simoltaneous calls and one for the allowed call per second)? If
yes, is it possible blacklisting/barring this user (in a cached table with
function like file permission.deny) for some time/forever if the call counters
exceed limit settled by the above threshold?
Thanks for your reply !!
Verbal
Hi all,
I have to implement some advanced SIP services like
parallel/sequential ringing, of all registered sip and
PSTN phones.
To accomplish that I will need a "call server" that:
*)In the "parallel ringing service" will initiate all
the relavant calls and when some phone answers it will
cancel the rest of them.
*)In the "seqential ringing service" it will iniate
and cancel the calls sequential until some phone
answers ..
Can SER support that kind of functionality ?
Thanks
George
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Αποκτήστε τη δωρεάν @yahoo.gr διεύθυνση σας στο http://www.otenet.gr
Hi All.
Can someone give me the syntax to check if from_uri==to_uri?
I'm trying to test wheather or not a subscriber has called themselves.
Regards,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
Hi everybody!
Today I have got this messages on my logs:
/usr/local/sbin/ser[32254]: WARNING: too many recursive routing table
lookups (101) giving up!
/usr/local/sbin/ser[32254]: WARNING: receive_msg: error while trying script
I think was because I hava a large routing table, so does anybody
knows what's the maximum size of a routing table?
Regards.
-- fabio
Hello everyone. I downloaded the latest version (0.8.14) of SER and
installed it on my redhat linux server. I've not set up a sip server before
so I'm new to this.
1.) Would you please point me in the direction to get started in configuring
the SER server? I would like to test it out w/ an ip phone and windows
messenger. I've been using some of the documentation that were available at
the same ftp site.
2.) I noticed that it is preferable to install and use mysql. I already have
mysql installed on my server, but the file "ser-mysql" could not be found in
the latest directory on the ftp site. Where can I find that file to set up
mysql for SER?
3.) What ports should I have open for SER to function if I'm behind
firewall?
4.) Lastly, I would also like to set up the sms gateway module. How can I
have access to that module?
Thank you for your help.
Sher
Dear Andrei.
Thanks for your response. That solved my problem.
Thanks you very much
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
[mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Enviado el: Viernes, 12 de Noviembre de 2004 11:07
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] "200 - Cancelling" Message Problem
On Nov 12, 2004 at 10:20, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net> wrote:
> Hello Andrei.
> Thanks for your reply. I'm using Mediaproxy with the mediaproxy
> module from SER. I'm use client_nat_test to modify the rport.
> if (client_nat_test("1")) {
> log(1, "NAT: Requerimiento de IP privada --> fixed contact
> (en rutina principal)\n");
> setflag(5);
> force_rport();
> fix_contact();
> append_hf("P-hint: fixed NAT contact for request\r\n");
> };
>
> Here, i'm attaching the complete debug from a call with a CANCEL request.
> (cancel_problem.txt)
>
>
> Can this problem be solved? or is more related with the endpoint?
Ok, so the problem is a little different from what I thought. It's not
about CANCEL reaching its destination, it's about the reply to CANCEL
not going back. This happens because you don't force_rport() all the
requests that come from natted UAs.
In the config snippet above, you only "fix" requests wiht private ip in
contacts, but CANCEL doesn't have any Contact: => it will never enter
this block.
Try to change client_nat_test("1") into client_nat_test("3").
Andrei
