sr-users February 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

144 participants
382 discussions

RE: [Serusers] Cisco ATA adapter firmware upgrade
by Paul.Wasik＠ipc.com 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

I have had bug issues with v3.0 ATA SIP code. The issues I've seen become evident when using the backup SIP proxy AltGk. If the ATA is running off the backup proxy because primary has failed, the ATA will never re-register with the backup proxy if a call is in progress. It just keeps on trying to register with the primary GkOrProxy. If the call is left up long enough, the registration will expire from the backup proxy and then it won't be registered anywhere. What's worse is that if you have … [View More]session timer configured, the call will drop once the registration ages out of the active backup proxy. Also seen issues when failed over to backup proxy where INVITEs are first sent to the failed primary proxy and the not the backup proxy resulting in an 8 - 10 second delay in INVITEs being sent to the active backup proxy. Also seen gratuitous ARPs being sent from ATA every 5 seconds to itself. All of these have been reported to Cisco TAC. -----Original Message----- From: Vitaly Nikolaev [mailto:vitaly@cifnet.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 5:50 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Cisco ATA adapter firmware upgrade Hmm.. we found that 3.0 have best quality when u use g729. and it looks fine and i did not noticed any bugs.. Can you please plese give me more info about those bugs ? Thx On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 09:41, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > You need a Cisco TAC account in order to download fiwmware. As long as I > know you can get one along with support contract from Cisco (either > buindled with hardware, such as router or by bying separate one). > Alternatively you can contact you hardware supplier - they should > provide you with firmware. > > -Maxim > P.S. I'd not recommend 3.0.0 - there are serious bugs. > P.P.S. 1-year Cisco support contact for ATA186 costs only some $30, so > that you can consider buying one. As long as I know this is cheapest > legal way to get a TAC account, after all this account will be valid > even after support contract has expired. > > Ashok Patel wrote: > > > Hi, all iptel.org users/members. I have question about > > my cisco ATA 186 adapter. I want to upgrade my cisco > > ata 186 adapter firmware from version 2.16.2 ata18x > > (build 030829a) to version 3.0. atasip (build > > 031210a). I am an end user and not reseller of this > > adapter. I have no luck from cisco web site to > > download the upgrade firmware. Does anybody know any > > site (other than or besides cisco) from where I can > > download the firmware upgrade image file or can anbody > > send me the firmware upgrade image file (to my e-mail) > > in order to upgrade my ATA adapter? > > > > -Thanks in advance, > > Ashok Patel > > ashokpatel(a)yahoo.com > > ashokpatel(a)email.com > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers Important Notice ************************************************* This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail. E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent and under circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept e-mail messages to and from its systems. [View Less]

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER forwinding to h323 gatekeeper
by Atle Samuelsen 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

He he.. Saw the NDA from sipquest.. Did'nt want to sign it myself.. - Atle * Arnd Vehling <av(a)nethead.de> [040211 20:18]: > Atle Samuelsen wrote: > >Ok. Does the software from meranetworks work good? > > Hard to say :) > > One major problem is that one cant configure the sip listen > port so were are running the mera linux binary of the SIP<>H323 gw > on a bsd box. And this configuration does core-dump under certain > circumstances. As you cant … [View More]

1 0

[Serusers] URI Rewriting - Part 2 :)
by Darren Nay 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

Hey All, I've been messing with this URI rewriting all day yesterday and today and I am still having some problems. I am able to re-write the request URI okay, but I can't rewrite the To: and From: fields in the SIP packet. Is that possible, and if so, how do I do it? I've tried using the subst function in the textops module. It doesn't seem to be re-writing all fields though. It still seems to only affect the request URI and not the To: or From: fields. Maybe I am doing something wrong?… [View More]

3 2

[Serusers] Rewrite URI
by kapil dhawan 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

I want to rewrite URI in one of my modules. How can i do it....i know to do it in ser.cfg file but not in my module..... _________________________________________________________________ Easiest Money Transfer to India. Send Money To 6000 Indian Towns. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42198.asp Easiest Way To Send Money Home!

2 1

RE: [Serusers] Installing SER Radius problem
by Morris, Scott 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

I wnet ahead and added it and ran ldconfig: [root@comm01 root]# ldconfig -v /usr/local/lib: libradiusclient.so.0 -> libradiusclient.so.0.0.1 I have the same error coming up - "libradiusclient.so.0 cannot be found" Scott Morris Enterprise Network Engineer DOE - ORAU / ORISE 865-576-4672 -----Original Message----- From: Edson Gellert Schubert [mailto:egschubert@ig.com.br] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:42 PM To: Morris, Scott; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [… [View More]

2 1

Re: [Serusers] SER forwinding to h323 gatekeeper
by Atle Samuelsen 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

Ok. Does the software from meranetworks work good? - Atle * Arnd Vehling <av(a)nethead.de> [040211 19:11]: > Hi, > > Vovidas siph323csgw _doesnt_ work as gateway between a SIP-Proxy and a > H323 Gatekeeper. We are currenntly using a demo version of a russian > (meranetworks) for terminating SIP into a H323 based system. > > We dont know about any Open-Source Solution for SIP<>H323 at the moment > but we havent really tried asteriks yet. Several people … [View More]

2 1

[Serusers] Still having the problem - Radius
by Morris, Scott 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

Linux Redhat ES 3 SER ser-0.8.12-0.i386.rpm SER RADIUS ser-radius-0.8.12-0.i386.rpm RADIUS client http://www.mcs.de/~lf/radius I installed per the "SIP Express Router RADIUS HOWTO" including running ldconfig -v I am still getting the error on running the ser-radius-0.8.12-0.i386.rpm Package Not Found Unlocatable Package libradiusclient.so.0 Required by 'ser_radius','0.8.12', '0') In my past testings, I have been able to get SER working, SER with MySQL working, but not this … [View More]

1 0

[Serusers] One way voice Problem
by Balaji Bapulal Thoguluva 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

Hi, I have SER and 2 cisco SIP phones. When I call between the SIP phones, I can hear voice from only direction (callee to caller works, caller to callee doen't work). Both phones display connected in their LCD screen and I also checked the codecs used by the phones are same. I would appreciate if anyone can point me what is wrong and what are the possible solution to this problem. I have attached the ngrep output below. In the second message of the output, I can see a "Warning: 392" … [View More]header field with a value "Noisy Feedback tells:...". ngrep output: ------------ interface: eth0 (192.168.6.0/255.255.255.0) ############# # U 192.168.6.103:49834 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 INVITE sip:3311@192.168.6.100 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2 004 18:33:50 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Expires: 180..User-Agent: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Accept: application/sdp..Contact: sip:3322@192.168.6.103:5060..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 226....v=0..o=CiscoSystemsSIP-IPPhone-UserAgent 26498 14989 IN IP4 192.168 .6.103..s=SIP Call..c=IN IP4 192.168.6.103..t=0 0..m=audio 27234 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 101..a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-even t/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-11.. # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.103:5060 SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.10 0>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.11 (i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..Warning: 392 192.168.6.100:5060 "Noisy feedback tells : pid=9732 req_src_ip=192.168.6.103 req_src_port=49834 in_uri=sip:3311@192.168.6.100 out_uri=sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060 via_cnt==1". ... # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.104:5060 INVITE sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060 SIP/2.0..Max-Forwards: 10..Record-Route: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100;ftag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e ;lr=on>..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.9c3bbf61.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <si p:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@19 2.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:50 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Expires: 180..User-Agent: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Accept: applicatio n/sdp..Contact: sip:3322@192.168.6.103:5060..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 226....v=0..o=CiscoSystemsSIP-IPPhone-User Agent 26498 14989 IN IP4 192.168.6.103..s=SIP Call..c=IN IP4 192.168.6.103..t=0 0..m=audio 27234 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 101..a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8 000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-11.. # U 192.168.6.104:50020 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0 100 Trying..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.9c3bbf61.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji " <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID : 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:50 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVI T# U 192.168.6.104:50020 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.9c3bbf61.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaj i" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-I D: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:50 GMT..CSeq: 101 INV ITE..Content-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.103:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34 ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Se rver: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:50 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Content-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.104:50020 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.9c3bbf61.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <s ip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID: 00 0b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Contact: sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060..Record-Route: <si p:3311@192.168.6.100;ftag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e;lr=on>..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:53 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Content-Type: a pplication/sdp..Content-Length: 221....v=0..o=CiscoSystemsSIP-IPPhone-UserAgent 14538 26512 IN IP4 192.168.6.104..s=SIP Call..c=IN IP4 192.168.6.104..t=0 0..m=audio 24138 RTP/AVP 0 101..a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-11.. # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.103:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e ..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..Contact: sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060..Record-Route: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100;ftag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e; lr=on>..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:53 GMT..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 221....v=0..o=CiscoSyste msSIP-IPPhone-UserAgent 14538 26512 IN IP4 192.168.6.104..s=SIP Call..c=IN IP4 192.168.6.104..t=0 0..m=audio 24138 RTP/AVP 0 101..a=rt pmap:0 pcmu/8000..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-11..E..Content-Length: 0.... U 192.168.6.103:49834 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 ACK sip:3311@192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f 0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e78 23@192.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:53 GMT..Route: <sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060>..CSeq: 101 ACK..Content-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.104:5060 ACK sip:3311@192.168.6.104:5060 SIP/2.0..Max-Forwards: 10..Record-Route: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100;ftag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e;lr =on>..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.103:5060..From: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;ta g=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..To: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e- 248e7823@192.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:33:53 GMT..CSeq: 101 ACK..Content-Length: 0.... ### U 128.163.55.134:496 -> 224.0.1.40:496 ..........7=........ ############ U 192.168.6.104:50020 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 BYE sip:3311@192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.104:5060..From: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de -474d2b85..To: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e78 23@192.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:34:02 GMT..User-Agent: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..CSeq: 101 BYE..Route: <sip:3322@192.168.6.103 :5060>..Content-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.103:5060 BYE sip:3322@192.168.6.103:5060 SIP/2.0..Max-Forwards: 10..Record-Route: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100;ftag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85;l r=on>..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.ac3bbf61.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.104:5060..From: <sip:3311@192.168.6.10 0>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..To: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..Call-ID: 000b5 f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:34:02 GMT..User-Agent: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..CSeq: 101 BYE..Co ntent-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.103:49834 -> 192.168.6.100:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.100;branch=z9hG4bK8153.ac3bbf61.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.104:5060..From: <sip:3311@192.168.6 .100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..To: "User ID Balaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..Call-ID: 00 0b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..CSeq: 101 BYE..Content-Length: 0.... # U 192.168.6.100:5060 -> 192.168.6.104:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.104:5060..From: <sip:3311@192.168.6.100>;tag=c25f0b001363563cc13de-474d2b85..To: "User ID B alaji" <sip:3322@192.168.6.100>;tag=925f0b001c0632395f2e8-34ee90e..Call-ID: 000b5f92-63c00003-63cc121e-248e7823@192.168.6.103..Server: Cisco-SIP-IP-Phone/2..CSeq: 101 BYE..Content-Length: 0.... ###### exit 152 received, 0 dropped Thanks in Advance, Balaji Thoguluva [View Less]

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Has anyone tried SIP over GPRS yet?
by Klaus Darilion 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

It all depends on the tarif of your provider - in my case, using VoIPoGRPS is much more expensive than the GSM tarifs (if I call somebody in Austria). Klaus Arnd Vehling wrote: > Hello Klaus, > > thanks for sharing your experiences. I somehow expected to get > miserable voice quality with GPRS and i know about the high latencies. > > But beeing able to use a GPRS IP Volume Tarif and using something > like this http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5033717348.html with &… [View More]

1 0

[Serusers] How to use check_from function
by wangji 11 Feb '04

11 Feb '04

Hi all, I add user using serctl like: #serctl add 123456 pwd123456 123456(a)iptel.org But when I use check_from, it always return fail. And the from is like 123456 <sip:123456@iptel.org>. I wonder what need to be add in datebase and how to add it. Maybe I need add alias using "serctl alias add 123456 sip:123456@iptel.org" ? Jimmy

1 0

← Newer
1
...
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2004