Hi, I have two questions regarding the setting up of aliases:
1. can i set up an alias using another domain name. for instance:-
$ serctl alias add john@another_domain sip:john@mydomain
2. Do i have to modify ser.cfg when i add aliases. I currently have the
default configuration. If yes how do i modify it. Thanks
regards,
Onyeka
Hi All.
I´m using Asterisk with SER. I can make call between two internal VoIP
gateways or from na internal to external VoIP gateway. But when I get a
external call, this call hang ups 5 seconds after and I reveive the
following messages
*CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/16008-3d17",
"SIP/16007&SIP/16006|20|tr") in new stack
-- Called 16007
-- Called 16006
-- SIP/16007-8c24 is ringing
-- SIP/16007-8c24 answered SIP/16008-3d17
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/16008-3d17 and SIP/16007-8c24 Mar
30 13:53:11 WARNING[1125685952]: chan_sip.c:495
retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
2eb06a983415436d4f2845a44dd9df5a(a)192.168.0.252 for seqno 102
(Request)
Mar 30 13:53:12 WARNING[1125685952]: chan_sip.c:495
retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
2eb06a983415436d4f2845a44dd9df5a(a)192.168.0.252 for seqno 102
(Request)
Mar 30 13:53:12 WARNING[1125685952]: chan_sip.c:495
retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
D9A3-E113-71478237A5B7568-7@Octtel for seqno 8 (Response)
== Spawn extension (sip, 1000, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/16008-3d17'
Jadylson da Rocha Passos Bomfim
Redevox Telecom
Uberlandia +55 34 3234-7813
São Paulo +55 11 5055-6888
Móvel +55 34 9103-6854
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.643 / Virus Database: 411 - Release Date: 25/3/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.643 / Virus Database: 411 - Release Date: 25/3/2004
Sorry to send again, posted a reply instead of a new thread!
Hi all,
We are having some problems with RTP back to clients behind NAT. We are running the very latest Ser and RTP code from CVS and are running our Ser proxy in mhomed mode. We are also making use of the new EI, IE, II and EE flags in force_rtp_proxy (bridged mode?) as we have a public interface which clients talk to and a private interface which routes off to a Cisco gateway and then off to the PSTN. We are making use of the nathelper module and SIP messsages are flowing fine to/from clients behind NAT. The problem is that in bridged mode we cannot get the direction=active part to work and outgoing RTP is going to the default port number sent out by the client (e.g. 5004) when in fact NAT on the router has moved the source port to something random (e.g. 12345). How can we get Ser/RTP proxy to ignore the port set in the original SDP and instead force it to wait for inbound voice first before then sending outbound voice to the source port of the inbound RTP? Of course we are using the fix_nated_sdp("1") to append the direction=active header, but it doesn't appear to be having any affect.
We ran Ser/RTPproxy on a box with a single interface (not mhomed) and didn't experience any of these issues. Can Ser/RTPproxy still do direction=active on the external interface even when in bridged mode? If so, how can we make it work?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Rgds,
Stephen Miles
Hi all,
We are having some problems with RTP back to clients behind NAT. We are running the very latest Ser and RTP code from CVS and are running our Ser proxy in mhomed mode. We are also making use of the new EI, IE, II and EE flags in force_rtp_proxy (bridged mode?) as we have a public interface which clients talk to and a private interface which routes off to a Cisco gateway and then off to the PSTN. We are making use of the nathelper module and SIP messsages are flowing fine to/from clients behind NAT. The problem is that in bridged mode we cannot get the direction=active part to work and outgoing RTP is going to the default port number sent out by the client (e.g. 5004) when in fact NAT on the router has moved the source port to something random (e.g. 12345). How can we get Ser/RTP proxy to ignore the port set in the original SDP and instead force it to wait for inbound voice first before then sending outbound voice to the source port of the inbound RTP? Of course we are using the fix_nated_sdp("1") to append the direction=active header, but it doesn't appear to be having any affect.
We ran Ser/RTPproxy on a box with a single interface (not mhomed) and didn't experience any of these issues. Can Ser/RTPproxy still do direction=active on the external interface even when in bridged mode? If so, how can we make it work?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Rgds,
Stephen Miles
Running SER 0.8.12 on Solaris 8 -SPARC with MySQL installed.
The issue that I'm running into is that when the originating GW receives a
response and generates an ACK the SER doesn't seem to stop the timer for
resending the message. If you look in the log, you can see where the server
receives it, but the server resends the same response as if the ACK was
ignored. It the attached case a 503 response is sent back, but the same
situation occurs when other responses are sent.
I was also wondering if there was any way to process 300 responses within
the scripting vs. sending the 300 response back to the originating Gateway.
Thanks, Mike
Hi,
i have installed ser 0.8.12 and serweb fro CVS. Configuration seems OK
because i can get the page with correct image for login etc.
I have already create users in ser and i can also use this user in sip UA
e.g. X-lite to register in ser server. But i can not login in
user_interface/index.php. I got always "Bad username or password" on the top
of the page.
Can anybody help me?
thank you in advance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jie Zhou
Rechenzentrum Universität Stuttgart
Allmandring 3a
D-70550 Stuttgart
Telefon: ++49 (711) 685-5531
Telefax: ++49 (711) 678-8363
E-Mail: zhou(a)rus.uni-stuttgart.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
