Hi All
I have a question about the CORRECT operation of UA when making a call via a
forking proxy:
Lets say UA1 calls 7000(a)sip.com and user 7000(a)sip.com is available at UA2
and UA3 i.e. the
Proxy forks the request.
UA1 Forking UA2
UA3
Proxxy
1 |------INVITE---------->| |
|
2 | |--------INVITE-------------->|
|
3 |
|---------------------------INVITE------------->|
4 | |<---RINGING(totag=1234)------|
|
5 |<---RINGING(totag=1234)| |
|
6 |
|<------------------RINGING(totag=5768)---------|
7 |<---RINGING(totag=5678)| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
NOW UA3 WILL ANSWER
| |<----------------200 OK
(totag=5678)-----------|
8 |<-200 OK (totag=5678)--| |
|
9 |---ACK (totag=1234)--->| |
|
10 | |------------------ACK
(totag=1234)------------>|
AT THIS STAGE UA 3 IGNORES THE ACK AS IT DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO
ORIGINATING 200 OK AND THE
CALL IS NOT SETUP
* UA1 is using the to-tag of the first 180 RINGING it received (frame 5) no
matter what the to-tag in the
200 OK is
* My question here is: who is in the wrong???? The proxy or UA1?
* Should the proxy change the to-tag of the ACK before forewarding it to
UA3???
Any help/guidance would be much appreciated
Jason Penton
Rhodes University
Grahamstown
South Africa
Hi,
I configured serweb very well, but when I can't login any valid user ...
Neither in admin pages ... It says its an invalid user ..
The register pages works until the confirmation ... With this error ...
-------
Warning: fopen("/tmp/ser_fifo", "w") - Permission denied in
/var/www/html/functions.php on line 206
fie.uclv.edu.cu User Management
sorry -- cannot open write fifo
-------
My /etc/init.d/ser script doesn't work at boot time ... So a run it by
hand ...
Do I have to run it as another user .. (a ser user for example ?)
My apache is running under the apache user ... What abaut the
permissions of /tmp/ser_fifo ...
Thanks ...
Robert
Hi Jason Penton,
>>* My question here is: who is in the wrong???? The proxy or UA1?
UA1 is wrong.
>>* Should the proxy change the to-tag of the ACK before forewarding it
to UA3???
Proxy should just Forward the message .Proxy should not change the
to-tag.
Thanking you,
Regards,
Sreeram
Phone: 8520408 Ex:3208
-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces(a)cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Jason
Penton
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:29 PM
To: sip-implementors(a)cs.columbia.edu
Cc: serdev(a)lists.iptel.org; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Sip-implementors] FW: Forking Proxy
Hi All
Sorry about the last post - I have attached the call flow as an image
this time :-)
I have a question about the CORRECT operation of UA when making a call
via a forking proxy:
(see attached image for call flow)
Lets say UA1 calls 7000(a)sip.com and user 7000(a)sip.com is available at
UA2 and UA3 i.e. the Proxy forks the request.
* UA1 is using the to-tag of the first 180 RINGING it received (frame 5)
no matter what the to-tag in the 200 OK is
* My question here is: who is in the wrong???? The proxy or UA1?
* Should the proxy change the to-tag of the ACK before forewarding it to
UA3???
Jason Penton
Rhodes University
Grahamstown
South Africa
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin(a)wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
Hi
What version of MSN are you using? Because MSN Messenger 5.0 and above does not work with SIP
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Ansari, Fahriz
Sent: Mittwoch, 31. März 2004 20:24
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] msn messenger is not registering with ser
Hi,
I have ser working fine with all other products with authentication. I have problem with MSN messenger. It is sending request to ser more than about 15 times but ser is not registering. SER is even not responds with any type of error message.
Can somebody help me please?
Thanks,
Fahriz Aqeel Ansari
Hi All
Is there a way/hack to remove to-tags from incoming '180
Ringing' responses before forwarding them to the UAC.
My reason for doing this is that one of the UACs I am using
seems to screw the to-tag up when SER acts as a forking
proxy. i.e. the calling UA sends an ACK for the 200OK with
the to-tag equal to the to-tag received from the FIRST '180
RINGING' received. The net result is that the ACK is sent
with a different to-tag than the to-tag of the received 200
OK. The answering UA therefore does not accept the ACK and
the call is not completed.
Any help/guidance would be much appreciated
Jason Penton
Rhodes University
Grahamstown
South Africa
Hi,
I'm new in IP Telephony world and I began from the beginning using SER
...
I have found it very nice, simple to configure/use ... Althoug I've had
some problems in redhat9.
Ok, some days ago I was talking to a friend of mine who was
investigating on VoIP and tall me about VOCAL from Vovida.org and
Asterisk ...
I have read something about Asterisk in this mailing list but I hadn't
know of VOCAL ...
Could any one tell me about the open source SIP platforms in the todays
world ?
Their differences ... Etc ...
And also the Oparating Systems usually used for this ... (I work with
RedHat Linux 9)
I'm working for a really good solution for my University VoIP platform
...
Thanks,
Robert.