sr-users September 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

190 participants
382 discussions

by Atle Samuelsen

HI guys (and some girls) Just wonderd if anybody has had this problem : Ser on ip : xx.xx.xx.1/24 UA1 on ip : xx.xx.xx.2/24 (~0.5-1 MS away from ser) UA2 on IP : 192.168.1.10 (~30-40 MS away from ser) UA1 picks up the phone at once. before packets from Ua2 reachers ser. What should happen: ser should send CANCEL to UA2. But what Realy happens: ser "eats" the data from UA1. and discards data from UA2, which then just keep on ringing.. anybody seen something like this? -Atle

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] CPL-C questions

by Christopher Crawford

Hello. I am using the latest release of the unstable ser (cvs). Basic 1- When uploading the CPL script using the required headers, (Content-Type, Content-Disposition, Content-Length), the ser is stating that there is no Accept header and does not persist the script. The README states the Accept header is only for downloading the script. If an Accept header is required, what should it look like? 2- I have loaded a CPL script via the FIFO and am having issues with the "<lookup source="registration>", particularly when there was <success> finding the client's location/registration entry. In the script below, if there was a failure on the lookup, the proxy routes to the failed location. I am assuming my syntax is correct. Scenarios a. User is registered and interface is up --> script does not forward on noanswer or busy. Dialing party receives a 408. b. User is registered and interface is unreachable --> script does not forward on failure. Dialing party receives a 408. The script below works when I replace lookup with a <location> entry as it defines "contact location for user" (also removing the failure below). <cpl> <incoming> <lookup source="registration"> <success> <proxy timeout="4"> <busy> <location url="sip:1111111@192.168.1.102"> <proxy/> </location> </busy> <noanswer> <location url="sip:1111111@192.168.1.102"> <proxy/> </location> </noanswer> <failure> <location url="sip:2222222@192.168.1.102"> <proxy/> </location> </failure> </proxy> </success> <failure> <location url="sip:2222222@192.168.1.102"> <proxy/> </location> </failure> </lookup> </incoming> </cpl> Thanks, Chris

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] serweb: every user gets an anlias of 82000

by Peter Herre

Hi Doug, on Aug 11 you wrote to serusers: >SerWeb says to > >/* initial nummerical alias for new subscriber -- don't forget to align your SER routing script to it ! */ > $this->first_alias_number=82000; > >What parameter do you use to configure this in ser.cfg? Every test user I have >singed up gets an alias of 82000... > >Thanks, >Doug Eubanks >admin at dougware.net I have got the same problem. Did you find any solution? Best regards, Peter

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] PYTHON Help !!!!

by Razvan Nemesiu

I have a problem with the ser media proxy .I have red hat 9 installed on my system with ser 0.8.14 installed from a src and with acc and mysql support.I installed the media proxy but when I tried to run it I got an error (something about not finding Optionparser module).I thought that was a python problem so I downloaded python 2.3.4 and compiled it (with make) and installed it.Now I get another error: Starting SER MediaProxy server: mediaproxyTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/proxydispatcher.py", line 32, in ? import dispatcher File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/modules/dispatcher.py", line 28, in ? import random File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/random.py", line 42, in ? from math import log as _log, exp as _exp, pi as _pi, e as _e ImportError: No module named math What might be the problem...??

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] Q - SER capability ?

by Serge Leschinsky

Dear Sirs. I would like to find a response (to begining only “yes” or “no”) about the possibility to solve a problem by the means of SER My task is: There is one extern "line" (SIP connection), given by VoIP provider (with determined login/password). We need to create a group of users (we could name them “local users”), for they could register themselves on our server (they need authorization and accounting) and communicate with each other. If there is a need to go out to extern numbers, the connection should be through extern line by putting registration data, given by provider. There is almost all that is necessary. It would be good to put up a IVR, but it only desirable, but not necessary. Thank you in advance -- Best regards, Serge mailto:serge@artlife.tomsknet.ru

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] XP SP2

by Wilhelm Farrugia

Hello, I was working fine with Windows Messenger 4.7 and SER. I upgrade to SP2 and I cannot sign it. Not sure however SP2 modifies the remote call procedure used by windows messenger 4.7.2009 which had some security flaws. That is why 4.7.3 is installed automatically with SP2. It is not a question of removing WM5 you must revert back to the old RCP. Microsoft seems suggesting moving using windows messenger 5 for SIP, however I have found messenger 5 quite unreliable when used with SIP. Is there a way to get SIP on 4.7.2009 working with XP SP2 ? When I used Windows Messenger 5 with SER I experienced these problems: 1) users which are on-line are not seen on-line by the messenger client ( presence problem ) 2) you send a message to on-line user and you get message cannot be delivered. 3) You send a message and message does not get delivered, you do not receive an error message. Thank you, Regards, Wilhelm

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] astersix+sip+h323

by ser die

hello friends, iam trying for the sip and h323 conversion with asterisk as the gateway . does any body got success before in this if so please guide me in my intial configuration i am forwarding the calls to the astersik ip if we do the forwarding does we get the register ,invite etc methods . does the call will go through the ser ip during the entire call or else it directly go to the asterisk and cutt of communication with the ser. so guide me please in this regards with regards serdiehard __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] SER becomes very slow

by Tirpák Miklós

Hello! Sometimes SER becomes very slow, it can not respond to UDP requests within 5-10 seconds. I use 0.8.12 from rpm package on Redhat 7.3. Is there any knows bug related to this? When I stop and start SER it takes about 10 seconds to start. Restarting it several times solves the problem, it becomes fast again. I have this problem also on another machine with the same system and same config. Thanks, Miklos -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miklos Tirpak Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011 H-1132 Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] Can SER digest-authenticate itself to PSTN servers when forwarding requests from clients?

by Andreas Greulich

Hi all, I'm new to SER, so maybe the question is trivial. What I'm wondering if there's a way SER can itself (!) authenticate using digest authentication on a PSTN gateway? Obviously I can't use "rewriteuserpass" because this doesn't support digest authentication. Background: I'm using a hardware SIPphone (BT100) that can only connect to one single SIP server. I'd like to make it connect to SER running on my Linux box. SER would not need to authenticate the phone itself (it's my private LAN segment anyway). SER should register itself (not the phone) as a UA to several SIP servers in the Internet on behalf of the BT100 (like Stanaphone, Sipgate, Nikotel, etc). To do so, my credentials for these servers are placed on the Linux box (in cleartext). Of course these servers require digest authentication, jence my initial question. As soon as I make a call on teh BT100, SER can use a dialing plan in order to decide what PSTN to connect it to - but this should be invisible to the BT100, the SER proxy should even take care itself of the digest authentication. I browsed the auth module - but I can only find actions in there that would allow the proxy to digest-authenticate incoming requests - or did I miss something? I don't really feel like installing a MySQL server either (for my 2-3 accounts), unless really needed. What I need though is a way how the proxy could itself - independent of the calling client - authenticate on different servers (using different credentials at each server). Is this possible using SER? Or maybe some other software? Thanks, Andy

20 years, 5 months

[Serusers] Python Mediaproxy Problem

by Razvan Nemesiu

Hi , I have installed ser 0.8.14 ith the mediaproxy.so module.I configured the mediaproxy as it was written in the installation file..But when I try to start mediaproxy I get the following error: Starting SER MediaProxy server: mediaproxyTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/mediaproxy.py", line 22, in ? from options import ExtendedOptions File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/modules/options.py", line 18, in ? from optparse import Option, OptionValueError ImportError: No module named optparse Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/proxydispatcher.py", line 36, in ? from options import ExtendedOptions File "/usr/local/etc/ser/mediaproxy/modules/options.py", line 18, in ? from optparse import Option, OptionValueError ImportError: No module named optparse I mention that I have RedHat 9 and that I tried to install a newer version of python (python2.3-2.3.4-3pydotorg.i386.rpm python2.3-devel-2.3.4-3pydotorg.i386.rpm).Thanks !

20 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2004