sr-users January 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

199 participants
399 discussions

by sky0912＠vip.sina.com

hello jiri,every one: Thanks help me.i use ser-0.9.0 version ser,client is windows messenger,messager registrar to sip server,it problem. [root@localhost ser-0.9.0]# 17(25914) handle_subscription() entered 17(25914) parse_hfs(): Error while parsing headers 17(25914) handle_subscription(): Error while parsing message header 17(25914) handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 17(25914) SUBSCRIBE execute 17(25914) handle_subscription() entered 17(25914) parse_hfs(): Error while parsing headers 17(25914) handle_subscription(): Error while parsing message header 17(25914) handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 17(25914) SUBSCRIBE execute 13(25907) handle_subscription() entered 13(25907) parse_hfs(): Error while parsing headers 13(25907) handle_subscription(): Error while parsing message header 13(25907) handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 13(25907) SUBSCRIBE execute 18(25915) Binding '1008(a)10.167.16.179','sip:10.167.16.54:10749' has expired 17(25914) handle_subscription() entered 17(25914) parse_hfs(): Error while parsing headers 17(25914) handle_subscription(): Error while parsing message header 17(25914) handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 17(25914) SUBSCRIBE execute 12(25906) handle_subscription() entered 12(25906) parse_hfs(): Error while parsing headers 12(25906) handle_subscription(): Error while parsing message header 12(25906) handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 12(25906) SUBSCRIBE execute This is my scripts # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/pa.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1) modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 1) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "db_url","mysql://ser:heslo@10.167.16.179/ser") modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("pa", "pa_domain", "10.167.16.179") modparam("pa", "db_url", "mysql:ser:heslo@10.167.16.179/ser") modparam("pa", "default_expires",50) #modparam("pa", "default_expires",3600) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # if (src_ip==193.175.135.0/24){ # force_send_socket(smaug:5080); # forward(193.175.135.179); # break; # } # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") { if (!t_newtran()) { log(1, "newtran error\n"); sl_reply_error(); }; handle_subscription("registrar"); log(1,"SUBSCRIBE execute\n"); break; }; # if (method=="PUBLISH") # { # if (method=="PUBLISH") # { # if (!t_newtran()) # { # log(1, "newtran error\n"); # sl_reply_error(); # }; # handle_publish("registrar"); # log(1,"PUBLISH execute\n"); # break; # }; if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } ______________________________________ ===================================================================

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] can not confirm

by Pham Minh Dung

I installed SER, SER-MYSQL I installed Apache, PHP, and SERWEB. The database for ser is good. When I use the form to subscribe a user, I receive a link to confirm. When I confirm, the database has the user that I register (I check the database). But the confirmation.php can not open, and I can not login by the username, password that I register. So, help me, please. Sorry for my english. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- Pham Minh Dung Vietnam New Generation Telecom Adress: 4A2 Nguyen Chi Thanh - Hanoi Tel: 7753014 - 7712777

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] User interface website

by Tracy Chan

Hi All, Could anyone tell me that what the usage and purpose of 'send im', 'message store' and 'voicemail' functions which are all in user interface website ? Thank you very much. Regards, Tracy

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] ACL

by Tracy Chan

Hi All, Do anyone know what Access-Control-List (ACL) is ? Thank you very much. Regards, Tracy

19 years, 10 months

RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT

by Richard

I am not sure if cisco IOS supports hairpin traffic, but I think that's your problem. It doesn't show "supported" in http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jennings-midcom-stun-results-02.tx t. _____ From: Raymond Chen [mailto:rchen@cityabove.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:45 PM To: 'Richard' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT There is not firewall, we use cisco 7507 to perform NAT. Ray _____ From: Richard [mailto:richard@o-matrix.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:41 AM To: 'Raymond Chen' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT What firewall do you have? Your firewall probably has problems to support hairpin traffic. Richard _____ From: Raymond Chen [mailto:rchen@cityabove.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:56 PM To: 'Richard' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT We use SIPURA 2000 and rtpproxy. I have attached the sip message log. Ray _____ From: Richard [mailto:richard@o-matrix.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:27 AM To: 'Raymond Chen' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT What nat device do you have? Does it have any sip helper module? Are you running rtpproxy? It will be helpful if you can send a sip packet dump. Richard _____ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Chen Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:59 PM To: 'Matt Schulte' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT Matt, Both port use different sip port, and can make calls at the same time. But still can't get voice when call to each other. Raymond _____ From: Matt Schulte [mailto:mschulte@netlogic.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:08 AM To: Raymond Chen; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT If I had a guess I would say either the NAT or rtp/media proxy is getting confused about which client is which. Ignoring the problem for a second, can both sipura's make calls at the same time? Are you using NAThelper for this with SER? You mentioned "without proxy", this would mean port forwarding? Try this, make each sipura use a diff range of RTP ports (in their config). Matt -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Chen [mailto:rchen@cityabove.net] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:25 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT Dear all, I have two sipura box behind NAT. both use via header and can dial out and received calls without proxy. but they have no voice when they call to each other, any idea? Raymond

19 years, 10 months

RE: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT

by Matt Schulte

If I had a guess I would say either the NAT or rtp/media proxy is getting confused about which client is which. Ignoring the problem for a second, can both sipura's make calls at the same time? Are you using NAThelper for this with SER? You mentioned "without proxy", this would mean port forwarding? Try this, make each sipura use a diff range of RTP ports (in their config). Matt -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Chen [mailto:rchen@cityabove.net] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 12:25 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] multiple SIPURA behind same NAT Dear all, I have two sipura box behind NAT. both use via header and can dial out and received calls without proxy. but they have no voice when they call to each other, any idea? Raymond

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] Register with an alias?

by serusers＠jtoga.org

Hi, I'm trying to get the following functionality working (which may be impossible?) - Users have account (in subscriber table) with a numeric identity, say "1234(a)sip.acme.org" - Create an alias of this person so that they can be called by a text string, say "fred(a)sip.acme.org". This is in the alias table pointing to sip:1234@sip.acme.org Everything works fine. someone can call either "1234" or "Fred".... Now "fred" wants to use his text name to Register as the number is not used any more. In other words I'd like to lookup("aliases") before authenticating. (eg map from "fred" to "1234" and then verify based upon the password in the subscriber table for "1234"). Is there any way to have two (or more) 'subscriber' names get to the same auth info for Registration? Thanks for any pointers...

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] caller==callee

by Giovanni Balasso

Hi serusers, I know there must be a simple way to check if callee i same uri as caller in ser.cfg, but I can't figure it out, any ideas? thanks a lot (maybe a dumb question, but I'm losing my head) -- Giovanni Balasso giaso(a)yahoo.it

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] Problem accounting ACK

by Chuck Ramirez

Hello, We had some problems accounting the ACK for one call in our proxy. Due to network congestion, the ACK arrived at SER 10 seconds after the first 200 OK for INVITE. On this case, the proxy just forwarded the ACK without accounting it. Could this be related to the time between the ACK and the first 200 OK? If so, what is the maximum time between the 200 OK and the ACK in order account it? Regards, Chuck --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! � What will yours do?

19 years, 10 months

[Serusers] use_rpid? what happened? where did it go? did I miss something?

by Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya

Whatever happened to use_rpid? If you enable it in ser.cfg ( modparam("auth_db", "use_rpid", 1) ), you get 0(743) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <use_rpid> not found in module <auth_db> 0(743) parse error (140,19-20): Can't set module parameter ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) and, scooching around in the source shows *no* references to use_rpid whatsoever. Has it been replaced? If so, with what? Googling turned up a (somewhat cryptic) patch, which doesnt seem to help...

19 years, 10 months

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
40
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2005