What is the intended use of 'nat_flag' parameter in 'registrar' module?
Its default value is set to 4 whereas in modules such as 'mediaproxy'
its value gets set to 2. I wasn't able to find any documentation that
describes this parameter and/or its permissible values. Thanks in
advance -- GA
Anyone here?
Thanks.!
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Enero de 2005 18:14
Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Dynamic Routes with SER.
Thanks Samuel,
I think the dispatcher module does not acomplish my requeriments for
now. I more interested now in the avpops module. I read some lines about
the module a few months ago for a similar problem. Is someone using this
module for something like this?. In particular i want to mantain a route
table for all my destinations and the respective terminating gateway. For
example :
Code Gateway
56 | 192.168.0.1
1 | 192.168.0.2
44 | 192.168.0.3
and so on....
This table is consulted for all the incoming request and then SER answer
with a Redirect for the particular GW.
Can someone provide me and example on how the AVPOPS module can handle this?
I will really appreciate....
Thanks in advance
Best Regards.
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Samuel Osorio Calvo [mailto:samuel.osorio@nl.thalesgroup.com]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Enero de 2005 12:30
Para: dnay(a)ionosphere.net; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net
Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Dynamic Routes with SER.
Hi,
There are a couple of modules in version 0.9 which can be used for
dynamic routing depending on the desired functinality.
One is called dispatcher, and is meant to be a load balancer without
fair distribution. I think that you define a list of possible servers in
a database and the dispatcher module forwards message to one of them
(together with all within-dialog future responses and requests).
The other option is to use avpops module which provides an
attribute-value functionallity. You can use them to select the next hop
depending on the incoming SIP message parameters and the values present
in a database.
I would advise you to take a look at the documentation of both modules
to see if they suit your requirements before using the exec commands,
which are not 100% reliable and increases the memory requirements as you
have mentioned. From the exec module's readme:
1.5. Known Issues
There is currently no guarantee that scripts ever return and
stop blocking SIP server. (There is kill.c but it is not used
along with the current mechanisms based on popen. Besides that
kill.c is ugly).
Enjoy SER,
Samuel.
Unclassified.
>>> Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net> 01/10/05 05:22PM >>>
Darren:
Thanks for your quick answer. I was thinking in a similar
solution,
using a external program, in fact i use the exec_dset() functionality
for
something similar. I was thinking add to this solution a Redirect
Server?.
Maybe the call to the dynamic route proccess is in the Redirect
Server,
calling the exec_dset() function, so all the extra resource needed to
perform these tasks are used in the redirect server and no in my
Proxy-Registrar Server. Is just an idea..
IS this scalable maybe?
Is this posible?
Thanks in advance
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Darren Nay [mailto:dnay@ionosphere.net]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Enero de 2005 11:06
Para: Ricardo Martinez; 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Dynamic Routes with SER.
Take a look in the SER Admin guide at "Executing an External Program".
You
can write an application with perl, C, etc.. Which will process the
call
info and return a destination set. This functionality is available
using
the exec_dset function in SERs exec module.
I use this feature in our SER deployment and it works great. The only
problem I've found so far is that it definitely does increases the
resources
required per call, and hurts your scalability. Especially if you use
perl.
Try to use C if at all possible, or persistent perl at the very least.
Darren Nay
On 1/10/05 11:01 AM, "Ricardo Martinez" <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net>
wrote:
> Hello List.
> I have a question on how to handle dynamic routes in SER. For what
> i know, SER by himself is not the best way to handle dynamic routes,
since
> every change in a route implies a change in the ser.cfg file and then
a
> restart of the service. So i'm thinking how to solve this problem
and a
was
> hoping that someone could give some advice on this issue.
> Any idea is welcome.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> BEst Regards.
>
> Ricardo Martinez.-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
I want to be able to prefix a dialled number before lookup. I use the
command prefix("123") and I can then use lookup("location") and it is
found in my database. But if I then use lookup again it fails. Does
anyone know the reason why ?
Thanks
Simon
Hi everyone,
I have one question which I have searched but didn't
find an answer. If I have a FXO (SIP) gateway which requires authentication,
how can SER authenticate with it? Is it possible? Can an example be posted?
Thanks,
Humberto
Hi list,
I've created a new module for SER but I'm not able to set modparam values.
SER says no module matchs. Should I do any special configuration before?
Thanks,
Vitor Brasileiro.
Here's a very simple question about a PSTN Gateway :-
When a PSTN gateway receives an INVITE, does it dial the number in
the Request-URI or the To header field ?
Does it depend whether the gateway support RFC2543 or RFC3261 ?
Many Thanks
Simon
HI all, I have implement SER + RadiusClient (raidus_SER how to)
With command radclient -f digest 203.160.97.234:1645 auth mysecret =>OK
But I can't use SIP client connect to radius server. I don't see anything
radius message
Help me config SER+Radiusclient and Radiator
Thank a lot
Dear Community,
I still have gateways that confirm to RFC2543 and not the newer RFC3261.
This means the use of URI and To fields are different. Is there any way
of telling sip_router that it needs to conform to the old spec ?
Thanks
Simon
It seems Sipura's use NOTIFY for their keepalives, since the user in
question is registered, I was wondering what others have done out there
to ack these messages? It's of course easiest to ignore these but I
wanted an alternative. :-)
Matt
Thanks Samuel,
I think the dispatcher module does not acomplish my requeriments for
now. I more interested now in the avpops module. I read some lines about
the module a few months ago for a similar problem. Is someone using this
module for something like this?. In particular i want to mantain a route
table for all my destinations and the respective terminating gateway. For
example :
Code Gateway
56 | 192.168.0.1
1 | 192.168.0.2
44 | 192.168.0.3
and so on....
This table is consulted for all the incoming request and then SER answer
with a Redirect for the particular GW.
Can someone provide me and example on how the AVPOPS module can handle this?
I will really appreciate....
Thanks in advance
Best Regards.
Ricardo.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Samuel Osorio Calvo [mailto:samuel.osorio@nl.thalesgroup.com]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Enero de 2005 12:30
Para: dnay(a)ionosphere.net; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net
Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Dynamic Routes with SER.
Hi,
There are a couple of modules in version 0.9 which can be used for
dynamic routing depending on the desired functinality.
One is called dispatcher, and is meant to be a load balancer without
fair distribution. I think that you define a list of possible servers in
a database and the dispatcher module forwards message to one of them
(together with all within-dialog future responses and requests).
The other option is to use avpops module which provides an
attribute-value functionallity. You can use them to select the next hop
depending on the incoming SIP message parameters and the values present
in a database.
I would advise you to take a look at the documentation of both modules
to see if they suit your requirements before using the exec commands,
which are not 100% reliable and increases the memory requirements as you
have mentioned. From the exec module's readme:
1.5. Known Issues
There is currently no guarantee that scripts ever return and
stop blocking SIP server. (There is kill.c but it is not used
along with the current mechanisms based on popen. Besides that
kill.c is ugly).
Enjoy SER,
Samuel.
Unclassified.
>>> Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net> 01/10/05 05:22PM >>>
Darren:
Thanks for your quick answer. I was thinking in a similar
solution,
using a external program, in fact i use the exec_dset() functionality
for
something similar. I was thinking add to this solution a Redirect
Server?.
Maybe the call to the dynamic route proccess is in the Redirect
Server,
calling the exec_dset() function, so all the extra resource needed to
perform these tasks are used in the redirect server and no in my
Proxy-Registrar Server. Is just an idea..
IS this scalable maybe?
Is this posible?
Thanks in advance
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Darren Nay [mailto:dnay@ionosphere.net]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Enero de 2005 11:06
Para: Ricardo Martinez; 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Dynamic Routes with SER.
Take a look in the SER Admin guide at "Executing an External Program".
You
can write an application with perl, C, etc.. Which will process the
call
info and return a destination set. This functionality is available
using
the exec_dset function in SERs exec module.
I use this feature in our SER deployment and it works great. The only
problem I've found so far is that it definitely does increases the
resources
required per call, and hurts your scalability. Especially if you use
perl.
Try to use C if at all possible, or persistent perl at the very least.
Darren Nay
On 1/10/05 11:01 AM, "Ricardo Martinez" <rmartinez(a)redvoiss.net>
wrote:
> Hello List.
> I have a question on how to handle dynamic routes in SER. For what
> i know, SER by himself is not the best way to handle dynamic routes,
since
> every change in a route implies a change in the ser.cfg file and then
a
> restart of the service. So i'm thinking how to solve this problem
and a
was
> hoping that someone could give some advice on this issue.
> Any idea is welcome.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> BEst Regards.
>
> Ricardo Martinez.-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
