>Hello experts,
>
> I was trying to set up a VoIP system with SER as my signalling
>proxy and was able to get lot of useful info from this mailing list.
>Thank you.
> I would like to know if there exists an open source billing
>solution which can fit seemlessly with SER and can handle realtime
>rating ( in a prepaid scenario). My initial study on this gave me the
>following link with a list of open source billing solutions. I would
>also like to know some reivews on these from experts like you. Since I
>have very less time to bring my project to life.
>
>http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Open+Source+Billing+Systems
>
>
>Thanks a lot in advance.
>
>Regards,
>Jithu
We have a working system we built that allows for rates to be preset in a
db. It calculates start and stop using acc table. I dont know if we will
release as gpl but if you want to see the backend functionality contact me
directly. It is already setup to work in prepaid
eric(a)v1010.com
Eric
Hi All,
I just wanted to ask you once again about the TCP-alias riddle. I found out, that there is a problem with the combination of fix_nated_contact(), force_tcp_alias() and NAT:
Imagine following situation:
Alice behind NAT: socket 172.16.0.6:2421
Nat-Box translates this to 192.168.0.13:6007
The Outbound-Proxy of Alice is 192.168.0.1
Bob is registered with 192.168.1.1
1.)
Her INVITE:
====================================================================
INVITE sip:bob@192.168.1.1:2331;transport=tcp;line=wxqurd1s SIP/2.0
[...]
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 172.16.0.6:2421;received=192.168.0.13;
branch=z9hG4bK-wm9jcstcboys;rport=6007
From: "Alice" <sip:alice@atlanta.com>;tag=sufzmxi0us
To: "Bob" <sip:bob@biloxi.com>;tag=c9550czwtn
[...]
Contact: <sip:alice@172.16.0.6:2421;transport=tcp;line=fyyuh6tl>
[...]
====================================================================
2.)
fix_nated_contact() doesn't work with TCP (look at nathelper.c).
force_tcp_alias() now creates following tuple as TCP-alias: 192.168.0.13:6007 to 192.168.0.13:2421
Reason:
The TCP-alias is not built solely from the Via-header as suggested in the draft. The portnumber is taken from the Via-header and the IP-address is taken from the source of the incoming datagram. I read it in the sourcecode and assured it by contacting Andrei!
3.)
So as a result of the notfixed Contact-header of Alice's INVITE the BYE of Bob is addressed to 172.16.0.6:2421. But no TCP-alias exists for this socket :-(
4.)
I made following test by rewriting the Contact-header....
====================================================================
if (method=="INVITE")
{
replace("Contact: <sip:alice@172.16.0.6:2421;transport=tcp;",
"Contact: <sip:alice@192.168.0.13:2421;transport=tcp;");
}
====================================================================
...with success. Now TCP-alias works as you can see on my Ethereal-trace below!
Compare the destination port of the packet to the destination port of the RURI!
====================================================================
[...]
Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 5060 (5060), Dst Port: 6007 (6007), ...
Session Initiation Protocol
Request-Line: BYE sip:alice@192.168.0.13:2421;transport=tcp;line=fyyuh6tl SIP/2.0
Message Header
[...]
From: "Bob" <sip:bob@biloxi.com>;tag=kcsveifugd
To: "Alice" <sip:alice@atlanta.com>;tag=ricaq5cy15
Contact: <sip:bob@192.168.1.1:2331;transport=tcp;line=wxqurd1s>
[...]
====================================================================
Another solution:
Comment the lines in nathelper.c which force the return in case of TCP or TLS. Now all works well!
But why??????????????
regards,
Philipp
I'm working in a VoIP solution here in my university and we have a
wide LDAP base and I am thinking about using it for
I found on the internet Ldap/Ldaps modules for SER
(http://www.ethworld.ethz.ch/technologies/sipeth/ser_modules/ldaps),
but I am afraid that I could only use them for lookups and not direct
authentication.
I guess I could use radius for authentication but I dont know if
installing a radius server "just" for this would be worth the effort.
Does anyone know if there is a way to authenticate users in a LDAP
server without using Radius? I mean, could I use SER directly with
LDAP without using RADIUS?
Regards,
Felipe
--
Master Student - Electrical Engineering Department
Computer Engineering and Telecommunications Research Group
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brazil
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that
whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life."
John 3:16
Hello everybody,
I would like to ask all of you that have access to different OS
distributions to help with package generation. Please reply (personally
if you prefer better this way) with OS name, version and architecture.
We are looking mainly for common used distributions:
Debian - testing (the other two are accounted already)
Redhat
Suse
Open/NetBSD (FreeBSD accounted)
SUN/Solaris
Gentoo
...
We will help as much as possible with guidelines. We would require
tomorrow an early compiling on all available systems to fix eventual
warnings.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi there,
i'm new here and need help to fix my problem.
I have final project that is configuring msilo module in SER 0.9.1.
But i'm new in Linux and don't have any idea bout it.
i want to ask if:
1. voicemail and msilo module the same?
2. how can i make the very first step? umm..begin from the
installation of modules that i need to configure msilo module
i'm blank...please someone help me..
thanx..
Yours,
Meidiana
email add : gotcha_em(a)yahoo.com
Indonesia
The mailing list has no archive, it is created specially in such way. See:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-September/000941.html
Daniel
On 10/27/05 17:11, Olivier Taylor wrote:
> The Business Archives
>
> No messages have been posted to this list yet, so the archives are currently
> empty. You can get more information about this list.
>
> Olivier
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] De la
> part de Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Envoyé : jeudi 27 octobre 2005 16:03
> À : Vanlandschoote Michel
> Cc : serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Objet : Re: [Serusers] OpenSER infrastructure dimensioning
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On 10/27/05 16:13, Vanlandschoote Michel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are considering OpenSER for offering free SIP-based voice, video
>> and IM services and I am trying to get an idea of the project cost.
>>
>> The components we need are:
>> - SIP stateful proxy + registrar server
>> - location & presence server
>> - simple2jabber
>> - media proxy for symmetrical NAT traversal
>> - (perhaps I forgot something here?)
>> We'll rely on external gateways for PSTN access so that is not to be
>> taken in consideration here.
>>
>> Now can somebody give me an indication on the server park
>> dimensioning? In other words, how many SIP servers, media proxies, ...
>> would I need per 10000 subscribers?
>>
> a computer as you described below is more than necessary. The bottle
> neck could be the bandwidth if you proxy the media stream through the server
>
>>
>> The server platform could be e.g.:
>> - operating system: Linux
>> - hardware: HP ProLiant DL380 Generation 3 (single CPU with 1GB RAM)
>> but of course any equivalent would do as well.
>>
>> I also have a second question: which organisations in Europe offer
>> commercial support for OpenSER?
>>
> The openser project is the result of many contributions, its public
> activity and development is guided by business independence. For such
> requirements and questions, the project provides a mailing list
> business(a)openser.org, where the contributors and independent consultants
> are ready to take your request:
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/business
>
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>>
>> Hope this forum is the right place for this kind of questions... I
>> really appreciate your input,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> *************************************************************
>>
>> Dit e-mail bericht inclusief eventuele ingesloten bestanden kan
>> informatie bevatten die vertrouwelijk is en/of beschermd door
>> intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd
>> voor de geadresseerde(n). Elk gebruik van de informatie vervat in dit
>> bericht (waaronder de volledige of gedeeltelijke reproductie of
>> verspreiding onder elke vorm) door andere personen dan de
>> geadresseerde(n) is verboden. Indien u dit bericht per vergissing
>> heeft ontvangen, gelieve de afzender hiervan te verwittigen en dit
>> bericht te verwijderen.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which
>> is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and
>> are intended for the sole use of the addressees. Any use of the
>> information contained herein (including but not limited to total or
>> partial reproduction or distribution in any form) by other persons
>> than the addressees is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
>> error, please notify the sender and delete its contents.
>>
>> *************************************************************
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
Hello, I want to use variables in ser.cfg and I m trying to use avpops
for it
# first by giving the variable "var" the value "internal"
# string mysar = internal;
avp_write("internal", "s:myvar");
# and checking this variable later:
# if (myvar = internal)
if (avp_check("s:myvar", "eq/internal/i")){
But this never enters in this if, can someone tell me the way to do it?
Or where is some documentation about avpops (iptel.org/ser doesnt have).
Thanks
Joao Pereira
Hi,
we are considering OpenSER for offering free SIP-based voice, video and
IM services and I am trying to get an idea of the project cost.
The components we need are:
- SIP stateful proxy + registrar server
- location & presence server
- simple2jabber
- media proxy for symmetrical NAT traversal
- (perhaps I forgot something here?)
We'll rely on external gateways for PSTN access so that is not to be
taken in consideration here.
Now can somebody give me an indication on the server park dimensioning?
In other words, how many SIP servers, media proxies, ... would I need
per 10000 subscribers?
The server platform could be e.g.:
- operating system: Linux
- hardware: HP ProLiant DL380 Generation 3 (single CPU with 1GB RAM)
but of course any equivalent would do as well.
I also have a second question: which organisations in Europe offer
commercial support for OpenSER?
Hope this forum is the right place for this kind of questions...
I really appreciate your input,
Michel
*************************************************************
Dit e-mail bericht inclusief eventuele ingesloten bestanden kan informatie bevatten die vertrouwelijk is en/of beschermd door intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Elk gebruik van de informatie vervat in dit bericht (waaronder de volledige of gedeeltelijke reproductie of verspreiding onder elke vorm) door andere personen dan de geadresseerde(n) is verboden. Indien u dit bericht per vergissing heeft ontvangen, gelieve de afzender hiervan te verwittigen en dit bericht te verwijderen.
This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the addressees. Any use of the information contained herein (including but not limited to total or partial reproduction or distribution in any form) by other persons than the addressees is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete its contents.
*************************************************************