Ok, I worked out that you need to use append_branch, like this:
append_branch (proxy1)
append_branch (proxy1)
t_replicate (proxy3)
That's what the devevelopers say anyway...
However, all the t_replicate's are going to exactly the same proxy.
Here's a post by two people that have reported _exactly_ the same problem.
Is there a solution?
http://www.archivum.info/serusers@iptel.org/2004-12/msg00268.html
Thanks,
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Garstang
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:11 PM
To: users(a)openser.org
Subject: [Users] t_replicate after failure
In the scenario below, if the first t_replicate fails because 192.168.10.5 returns "Not Found", the second t_replicate command does not execute. Why? How can I make it execute? Call me crazy, but this doesn't seem at all intuitive to me. In a functional programming world, if the first fails, the next should still run.
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("voip.com", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("voip.com", "0");
exit;
};
save("location");
t_replicate("192.168.10.5","5060");
t_replicate("192.168.10.7","5060");
exit;
};
Thanks,
Doug.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello
Im managing a WAN with a lot of Universities. Some of them already
installed a VoIP solution based on SER (to manage SIP clients) and
Asterisk (for services and PSTN GW). The DNS routing provided by SER is
working perfectly, but we want to start routing all calls thru IP
transparently.
We want our legacy PBXs (that are connected to Asterisk) to forward all
calls to IP. The idea is to forward all calls to a central VoIP server,
that has all the numbers that already are VoIP enabled, and then:
- if the called number is VoIP enabled, he routes the call to that Univ.
VoIP server
- if the called number isnt in the list, the call goes back to the PBX
and a PSTN call is dialed
This way, ppl starts using the VoIP infrastructure, without even knowing
what VoIP means, and the telecom bill starts decreasing.
I know thats a statical and hierarchical structure and we dont want
that, but is a good solution for this migration phase, where a lot of
places are still using TDM systems.
Now, the top of the hierarchy should be an Asterisk or SER? I dont know
which of the systems is the best choice for the job. Does someone has an
idea of what should we use?
Thanks
Joao Pereira
www.fccn.pt
Does anyone know if there is a way to authenticate SER to MS Active
Directory? I'd like to use an existing user database instead of
having to manage users myself, and most of our users are in Active
Directory.
Has anyone tried this?
What are most SER users using for authentication? Is anyone here
tying into any kind of existing organization user database?
hi andres ,
i request your help to install SIP SER as a proxy .
THanks selva
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender or administrator(a)tataelxsi.co.in
Hi,
As I'm a newbie on this subject, I'm wondering how two SIP devices with ICE
compatibility will interact with a (open)SER+Mediaproxy implementation since
ICE implementation could permit to avoid RTP flow on the (open)SER server.
Is there any update to do on the conf file on the (open)SER ? Since they are
ICE compatible, the SIP flow (signalization) will be analysed by this two
devices in order to create a direct RTP flow ? Or is it because i know on
the (open)SER side that this devices are ICE compatible I send a special SIP
message ? In fact I want to know if a server update is necessary or if it's
"free" to have this great feature. :)
Thanks,
Christophe
Hi all
I use d-link 704P router. When i want to make a call, signalisation is
good, but, when the client is hang up, i have voice to the client which
is connect in the D-link LAN and the other client has no voice. My
server has a
public IP.
When i'm find the log of the router, i see these messages:
unallowed access from 192.168.0.53:to 66.249.93.104:protocol=6 rule=3(by
firewall)
192.168.0.53, is the adress of the client behind the d-link lan, the
client which has voice and cannot transmit it!
what means theses messages?
how can i solve the router problem to make my calls?
please help
best regards!
Serge
Hello,
I am trying to configure pstn gateway with openser.when i start openser with default openser file it works fine, but i one direction. i can dial on my SIP user agent from outside. but when i am using pstn.cfg file as a openser.cfg(after rename). I am unable to even start openser server. it gives me errors and crashed.I puts my pstn gateway ip's in that file where requested.
Please please help
Regards
I'm using OpenSER 1.0.0 on OpenBSD 3.7 amd64.
I have a strange problem with the accounting: I set a couple of AVPs for
every message that arrives at the server. I'm sure they are there
because they are written in the syslog logging. Sometimes, when an
INVITE is relayed (with transactions) and receives an error (488, 422,
etc.), in the SQL logging there is no more presence of the AVPs!
Is this a known problem?
How can I avoid this?
Thanks.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- giannici(a)neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________
Hi,
thanks to Anand, you have now the liberty to get a more friendly output
during compilation. Just do:
NICER=1 make all
normal "make all" still produces same amount of output - it;s the
default since it's useful to see the compilation flags...at least for me...
also I got rid of the messages regarding the missing dependency files
(.d) during first compilation....
so, have a nicer compiling ;)
regards,
bogdan
Anand Kumria wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Attached is a diff that makes it nicer to compile openser. Should you
>want to see the exact compilation sequence Q="" make <...> will show it
>to you.
>
>Thanks,
>Anand
>
Hi all
i'm looking for a free/opensource application that generates CDRs (not XDRs,
must not be rated) from the accounting data/events generated by SER (i think
this is usually called normalization). I think this would have to be an
application that is able to match INVITEs and BYEs and form CDRs with call
start timestamp, call duration and so on.
I had a look at the list of accounting software on the iptel.org website,
but most of there applications are highly integrated accounting/billing
solutions, far more than what i need (and also most of them seem to be
commercial products). In the mailinglist archive i only found some
references to CDRTool which seems also to be commercial. Obv. there must be
a free version of CDRTool but neither i'm sure whether it implements exactly
what i need so i could "grab it" for my own purposes nor could i find a
place to download the free version).
Does anyone know if there is such a kind of application available? Or any
other idea how to deal with my requirements?
Thanks a lot for your help
Frank