Thanks for the replies so far - Everyone has been very helpful. I
have one final question. I deleted the "ser" directory from /usr/sbin
as suggested. I am using Suse Linux 9.0 so then I modified the
"profile" file in the /etc directory with the following:
PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/sbin/ser:."
Then I carried out the cvs instructions from the iptel site (as
detailed at end of this mail) to install SER 0.9.1. When I run "ser
-V" I now see that SER has been updated. However when I run
/usr/local/sbin/serctl start to start SER. I get an error:
Starting SER: PID file /var/run/ser.pid does not exist -- SER start
failed.
I used to start SER using /etc/init.d/ser start. That also doesn't
work. What could be wrong? Also where is my new ser.cfg file stored?
My old one is still in /etc/ser.
Thanks again.
Aisling.
cd /usr/src
export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser
cvs login
[enter for password]
"cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site.
cd sip_router
make all
make install
>---- Original Message ----
>From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
>To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
>Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:07:35 -0500
>
>>Each linux user has an environment variable called PATH. You can set
>>your path in the .bash_profile (assuming a redhat linux distro).
>>Consult your linux distro for setting environment variables.
>>
>>On most you can just do this:
>>
>>export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin/
>>
>>But this will only be for you current logged in session. When you
>exit
>>the bash shell this setting will be lost.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:50:18 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
>><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>>> Apologies if this is a ridculous question where will I find the
>$PATH
>>> variable?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aisling
>>> >
>>> >---- Original Message ----
>>> >From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
>>> >To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie, serusers(a)iptel.org
>>> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
>>> >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:49:44 -0500
>>> >
>>> >>it looks like you have two copies of ser on your machine.
>>> >>
>>> >>You should complete remove /usr/sbin/ser and make sure
>>> >>/usr/local/sbin/ser is in your $PATH.
>>> >>
>>> >>Regards,
>>> >>Paul
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:43:56 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
>>> >><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I
>proceed
>>> >from
>>> >>> here?. Thank you for the reply.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Aisling.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ---- Original Message ----
>>> >>> From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
>>> >>> To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
>>> >>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500
>>> >>>
>>> >>> >Aisling,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >It seems like one of the following is true:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your
>system.
>>> >If
>>> >>> >you
>>> >>> >type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ??
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >Regards,
>>> >>> >Paul
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
>>> >>> ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>>> >>> >> Hello,
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to
>>> >0.9.0. I
>>> >>> >> have
>>> >>> >> followed the instructions at the following link and also on
>the
>>> >>> >onsip
>>> >>> >> site.
>>> >>> >> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running
>0.8.14.
>>> >>> >I've
>>> >>> >> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone
>PLEASE
>>> >>> >> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> cd /usr/src
>>> >>> >> export
>CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser
>>> >>> >> cvs login
>>> >>> >> [enter for password]
>>> >>> >> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable
>version
>>> >and
>>> >>> >> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site.
>>> >>> >> cd sip_router
>>> >>> >> make all
>>> >>> >> make install
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> It says every file is updated but I still run the same
>stable
>>> >>> >> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this
>>> >command
>>> >>> >> (killall ser)
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> Please let me know what Im doing wrong,
>>> >>> >> Aisling.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> -------------------Legal
>>> >>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>>> >intended
>>> >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may
>be
>>> >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it
>be
>>> >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the
>above
>>> >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction
>of
>>> >this
>>> >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not
>guarantee
>>> >the
>>> >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is
>not
>>> >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is
>not
>>> >a
>>> >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by
>the
>>> >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> >> Serusers mailing list
>>> >>> >> Serusers(a)iptel.org
>>> >>> >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >-------------------Legal
>>> >>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>>> >intended
>>> >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may
>be
>>> >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it
>be
>>> >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the
>above
>>> >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction
>of
>>> >this
>>> >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not
>guarantee
>>> >the
>>> >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is
>not
>>> >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is
>not
>>> >a
>>> >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by
>the
>>> >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -------------------Legal
>>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>>> >intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its
>contents
>>> >may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should
>it be
>>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of
>this
>>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee
>the
>>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not
>a
>>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>-------------------Legal
>>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>intended
>>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of
>this
>>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee
>the
>>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not
>a
>>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> -------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>>
>>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents
>may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>-------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>
>>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
>only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>
>>
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
Hi serusers
another simple problem making me crazy. I can't get my NATed clients to send
ACKs and BYEs thru ser. After inviting another uac with ser taking care of
the relay (setting up rtpproxy and fixing nat), any other signaling message
doesn't even hit ser and gets lost.
My configuration is the following: I have ser running on a machine with only
private ip, but reachable from the internet via router public ip and port
forwarding. I noticed that the INVITE is sent by uacs to the right public ip
but then every other signal (ACKs, BYEs, CANCELs) is sent by uacs to ser
private ip.
Let me understand something more about ser, please. Any ideas why BYEs are
sent to private ip? Is ser forcing the uacs to modify sip header whith its
own ip? where is it doing this? maybe in record_route or in
fix_nated_contact?
Thanks in advance to everyone who will make some light on my doubts.
Here is the stripped ser.cfg
listen=192.168.1.100
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
if (method == "REGISTER" || !search("^Record-Route:")) {
fix_nated_contact();
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1");
};
force_rport();
setflag(6);
};
};
record_route();
if (loose_route()) {
route(1);
};
if (method=="INVITE") {
if (lookup("location")) {
setflag(1);
route(1);
break;
};
};
route[1] {
if (isflagset(6)){
force_rtp_proxy();
t_on_reply("1");
};
if (method == "BYE" || method == "CANCEL"){
setflag(1);
};
if (!t_relay()){
sl_reply_error();
};
break;
}
--
Giovanni Balasso
giaso(a)yahoo.it
When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I proceed from
here?. Thank you for the reply.
Aisling.
---- Original Message ----
From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500
>Aisling,
>
>It seems like one of the following is true:
>
>1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1
>
>2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your system. If
>you
>type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ??
>
>Regards,
>Paul
>
>
>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to 0.9.0. I
>> have
>> followed the instructions at the following link and also on the
>onsip
>> site.
>> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/
>>
>> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14.
>I've
>> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE
>> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you.
>>
>> cd /usr/src
>> export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser
>> cvs login
>> [enter for password]
>> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version and
>> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site.
>> cd sip_router
>> make all
>> make install
>>
>> It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable
>> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this command
>> (killall ser)
>>
>> Please let me know what Im doing wrong,
>> Aisling.
>>
>> -------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>
>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
>only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers(a)iptel.org
>> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>
>-------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>
>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
>only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
Apologies if this is a ridculous question where will I find the $PATH
variable?
Thanks,
Aisling
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
>To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie, serusers(a)iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
>Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:49:44 -0500
>
>>it looks like you have two copies of ser on your machine.
>>
>>You should complete remove /usr/sbin/ser and make sure
>>/usr/local/sbin/ser is in your $PATH.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:43:56 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
>><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>>>
>>> When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I proceed
>from
>>> here?. Thank you for the reply.
>>>
>>> Aisling.
>>>
>>> ---- Original Message ----
>>> From: javarockx(a)gmail.com
>>> To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie
>>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
>>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500
>>>
>>> >Aisling,
>>> >
>>> >It seems like one of the following is true:
>>> >
>>> >1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1
>>> >
>>> >2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your system.
>If
>>> >you
>>> >type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ??
>>> >
>>> >Regards,
>>> >Paul
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll
>>> ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote:
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to
>0.9.0. I
>>> >> have
>>> >> followed the instructions at the following link and also on the
>>> >onsip
>>> >> site.
>>> >> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/
>>> >>
>>> >> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14.
>>> >I've
>>> >> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE
>>> >> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you.
>>> >>
>>> >> cd /usr/src
>>> >> export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser
>>> >> cvs login
>>> >> [enter for password]
>>> >> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version
>and
>>> >> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site.
>>> >> cd sip_router
>>> >> make all
>>> >> make install
>>> >>
>>> >> It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable
>>> >> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this
>command
>>> >> (killall ser)
>>> >>
>>> >> Please let me know what Im doing wrong,
>>> >> Aisling.
>>> >>
>>> >> -------------------Legal
>>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>intended
>>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of
>this
>>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee
>the
>>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not
>a
>>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Serusers mailing list
>>> >> Serusers(a)iptel.org
>>> >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >-------------------Legal
>>> >Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>intended
>>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of
>this
>>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee
>the
>>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not
>a
>>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>> >
>>>
>>> -------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>>
>>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and
>intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents
>may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>-------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>
>>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
>only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>
>>
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
Hi all,
I am using the following network configuration.
HOST1---NAT---Internet---HOST2
HOST1 and HOST2 are windows XP machines with SJPhone software. The NAT box
has SIP ALG(Application Level Gateway), which modifies the SIP packets to
replace the Private IP address with the Public IP address.
I am registering with iptel.org proxy server using TCP from both the
machines. I am able to make a call from HOST1 to HOST2. But when i try to
make a call from HOST2 to HOST1, i get an error which says, "477
Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred(477/TM)". When I
register using UDP, then i do not see this problem. Could someone tell me
what I am missing here.
Thanks
Mahesh
Hi all !
I tried to compile the latest CVS-Version of ser but i get always the
same failure:
root@siiip:~/sip_router> make prefix=/usr/local all
"Makefile.sources", line 17: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile.sources", line 19: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 56: Missing dependency operator
Error expanding embedded variable.
I tried also different versions of ser but i get this failure everytime.
I'm using FreeBSD 5.3.
Can anyone help me ?
Thanks
Dirk Willbrandt
Hi guys,
Does anybody have an experience with making X-lite more user-friendly
when after installing X-lite it asks for new user name and password
and sets X-lite ready to use for a call? Of course, already registered
with my SER router.
I know that FWD had this possibility.
Would anybody give me a hint what tool or software I need for this
task, please?
Thank you,
Lada
Hello,
I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to 0.9.0. I
have
followed the instructions at the following link and also on the onsip
site.
http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/
However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14. I've
given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE
PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you.
cd /usr/src
export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser
cvs login
[enter for password]
Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version and
"cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site.
cd sip_router
make all
make install
It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable
version. I've killed all ser processes before running this command
(killall ser)
Please let me know what Im doing wrong,
Aisling.
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
hi all
configuration:
inalp gw (pstn) ------> ser ------> asterisk (only voicemail)
the following problems occur:
1) ser forwards the call to asterisk (if the user is in the voicemail
group) if the client does not answer after 30 sec.
from sip to sip is working.
but if a call comes from the pstn to a sip client, the client rings and
hangs up after 30 sec. ser then forwards it to the asterisk, but the pstn
call keeps on ringing and no voicemail is to hear.
ser writes the following error
Mar 29 13:24:39 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]:
++++++++++++INVITE******************
Mar 29 13:24:39 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]:
++++++++++++voicemail***********************
Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7022]:
++++++++++++Failure Route******************
Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7022]:
++++++++++++Failure Route******************
Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]:
++++++++++++voicemail***********************
Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7016]: ERROR:
t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200
Mar 29 13:25:20 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]: ERROR:
t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200
Mar 29 13:25:21 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7016]: ERROR:
t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200
Mar 29 13:25:24 sip last message repeated 3 times
Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7015]:
++++++++++++Loose Route******************
Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: contact_parser(): Empty body
Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: parse_contact(): Error
while parsing
Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: get_contact_uri: Error
while parsing Contact body
2) if ua1 call ua2 (and ua2 is in the voicemail group) and ua1 hangs up
ser forwards to asterisk and the voicemail is run in the background,
but instead the call should be cancelled and not forwarded to the voicemail
does anyone know about these problems?
regards
raid
ser config snip:
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
# ------------- tm parameters
modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30)
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 25)
modparam("tm", "wt_timer", 5)
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer_avp", "inv_timeout")
route {
if (lookup("location") | lookup("aliases")) {
if (is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail")) {
log (1, "++++++++++++voicemail***********************");
t_on_failure("1");
avp_write("i:30", "inv_timeout");
t_relay();
route(2);
break;
} else {
log (1, "++++++++++++no voicemail********************");
route(2);
break;
}
}
}
route [2] {
if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" &&
!search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP
addresses");
break;
};
if (isflagset(2)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
failure_route[1] {
log (1, "++++++++++++Failure Route******************");
revert_uri();
rewritehostport("XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060");
append_branch();
t_on_failure("1");
t_relay();
break();
}
Hi,
I have record-route set from 200 OK for INVITE as
Record-Route: <sip:pu3@P3.com:5060;lr>
Record-Route: <sip:pu2@P2.com:5060;lr>
Record-Route: <sip:pu1@P1.com:5060>
Contact:<sip:u@UA.com:5060>
As the last record-route header doesn't have lr param(P1 might be expecting strict routing), in this combination can I send the ACK/BYE requests to sip:u@UA.com:5060 directly?
Is it possible to follow strict routing even though I get lr param?
While I was interoperating with sipgate.de (SIP express router)
I got ftag param and lr param in 200 OK, I was trying to send ACK/BYE requests to
record-route URI instead of final destination. Iam not getting any response for BYE.
Please help me.
regards,
SIPIT
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
