It seems that setting the "fr_inv_timer_avp" parameter more than once
during a call is not possible.
However there is a situation where this is necessary:
1. VoIP ATA to VoIP ATA call with call forwarding where call forwarded
number is a PSTN destination
To facilitate Call Forward No Answer, the fr_inv_timer_avp is used and
set to a value (say 12 seconds), after this timer hits a failure_block
is run, in this failure block i rewrite the destination and check if
this destination is a PSTN number. If it is than I would like to change
the fr_inv_timer_avp parameter to somthing higher due to the nature of
PSTN termination but it does not seem to have any effect.
Has anyone experienced this problem and possible found a workaround?
Or maybe this is a known issue
tavis
Hello,
I use ser/serweb-0.9.3 I added tow accounts with
numerical aliases.
When I dial user1@domain to user2@domain it's ok.
if i wish to forward to voicemail sems send me back
voicemessages.
However if i dial alias1@domain to alias2@domain I get
the message below.
How can I solve this problem ?
Harry
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jul 24 14:58:15 serveur1 Sems[2535]: Error:
(AmSession.cpp)(startSession)(497): 404 voicemail: no
email address for user <84>
Jul 24 14:58:15 serveur1 /usr/sbin/ser[7495]: ACC:
call missed: method=INVITE,
i-uri=sip:84@nxs.yi.org:5060;user=phone,
o-uri=sip:h.gaillac@192.168.0.20,
call_id=66219bb6-f9eef79c-bc2479d3(a)192.168.0.21,
from="test"
<sip:test@nxs.yi.org>;tag=CB323432-D0A509E1, code=404
voicemail: no email address for user <84>, userpart=84
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
I'm running 0.9.5, on my system, and *have* to comment out -DF_MALLOC
(and uncomment -DDBG_QM_MALLOC) to have the system be stable. It pretty
much always crashes when trying to do save("location")
Anyone else seen this?
List of modules is
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/acc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/exec.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/group.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/nathelper.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/mediaproxy.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/uri.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/domain.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/xlog.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/options.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/avpops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/lcr.so"
Howdy,
I'm playing with OPENSER 0.9.5 with sipp as the workload generator on
a bunch of linux boxes. When the transport is UDP, openser adds a
via header like it is supposed to as a proxy. But when I use TCP no
via header is added. This is a UAC->proxy->UAS scenario. Here's the
header as seen at the UAS:
| UDP message received [633] bytes :
|
| INVITE sip:service@10.0.1.41:5060 SIP/2.0
| Record-Route: <sip:10.0.1.42;ftag=1;lr=on>
| Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.42;branch=z9hG4bKe9cc.cc24a79.0
| Via: SIP/2.0/UDP bronxville1:5060;received=10.0.1.40;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0
| From: sipp <sip:sipp@bronxville1:5060>;tag=1
| To: sut <sip:service@10.0.1.41:5060>
| Call-ID: 1-31891@bronxville1
| CSeq: 1 INVITE
| Contact: sip:sipp@bronxville1:5060
| Max-Forwards: 16
| Subject: Performance Test
| Content-Type: application/sdp
| Content-Length: 132
| P-hint: outbound
And the corresponding message received at the UAS when using TCP:
| TCP message received [495] bytes :
|
| INVITE sip:service@10.0.1.41:5060 SIP/2.0
| Via: SIP/2.0/TCP bronxville1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0
| From: sipp <sip:sipp@bronxville1:5060>;tag=1
| To: sut <sip:service@10.0.1.41:5060>
| Call-ID: 1-31865@bronxville1
| CSeq: 1 INVITE
| Contact: sip:sipp@bronxville1:5060
| Max-Forwards: 70
| Subject: Performance Test
| Content-Type: application/sdp
| Content-Length: 132
Note the absence of the 2nd Via header. Openser complains about this on
the way back to the UAC.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
-Erich
--
Erich M. Nahum IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Research Staff Member P.O. Box 704
nahum(a)watson.ibm.com Yorktown Heights NY 10598
hello
i tried running serctl add 1001 1001 chris_cleofe2yahoo.com
but i got this error:
awk: syntax error near line 1
awk: bailing out near line 1
awk: syntax error near line 1
awk: bailing out near line 1
HA1 calculation failed
pls advise.
thnks.
hi there,
Can you please tell me if I can use the permissions module to trust the requests coming towards my SIP server using source IP. But my problem is I want to use flat files to store the source IPs I trust. Is it possible
And if the IPs are trusted I need to forward them without any authentication.
I need to store the trusted IPs in flat files since I dont need the overhead of querying DB.
Please help me out.
Thanx
---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
Hi,
I've recently encountered some problem with my SIP service whereby i
call out to a specific number and i encounter a one way voice. If i'm
the initiator, i cannot hear the other party but he can hear me. At
first i thought it was a return route issue (as i'm going thru NAT) , so
i switch my SIP to a public IP but i still face the same problem. Its
really only that specific PSTN number that i have dialed facing this
problem. The only difference that i can think of is that PSTN number is
on a different route. I did a NGREP from my SIP server for the PSTN
number that works (2-way voice) and the Number that doesn't work (1-way
voice) . The only difference is there is an extra :
NGW --> Proxy
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
Proxy --> SIP Device
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
for the PSTN number that works (the one with 2-way voice).
Anyone has idea what does the Session Progress is for ? Or what problem
am i facing ?
Thanks a mILLION !
Regards,
Sam
I'm trying to use STUN for NAT traversal for all clients not using 1 to 1
NATing, and mediaproxy for the rare few who does.But it seems that all
traffic is proxied anyway, dont really understand why. I do call the
routeblock for mediaproxy before relaying the call, but since STUN is used
it should not detect that NAT is in place. Or am I missing some logic?
Any Idea on how to accomplish this?
Kind regards
Roger - Getting one step closer to a really god service everyday ;)